Misplaced Pages

Post-2012 legal history of Anders Breivik

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This article may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may interest only a particular audience. Please help by spinning off or relocating any relevant information, and removing excessive detail that may be against Misplaced Pages's inclusion policy. (January 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Breivik in 2011 or before

Since Anders Behring Breivik – perpetrator of the 22 July 2011 attacks in Norway – was sentenced 21 years prison on on 24 August 2012, he has continuted to appeal his sentence and sue the Norwegian government for violations of his human rights. He is in theory set to be released in 2032, lalthough his sentence could be prolonged indefinitely beyond that date

Background

Breivik's background

Breivik (born 13 February 1979)

2011 terror attacks

Criminal trial and conviction

2016 civil trial against Norwegian government

Breivik sued the government of Norway; the civil trial was held during four days in 2016. The verdict in the lower court was appealed; in the appellate court, he lost on all counts, and the supreme court decided not to hear the case. Breivik sued the government over his solitary confinement, and his general conditions of imprisonment, including a claim of an excessive use of handcuffs. Breivik claimed that his solitary confinement violated his human rights and asserted that he had been subjected to "degrading treatment, including hundreds of strip searches and frequent searches of his cell, including at night."

The Parliamentary Ombudsman had previously reported that the regimen for serving a prison sentence at the level of particularly high security constitutes a heightened risk of inhumane treatment. On 14 March, members of the court performed a walk-through of prison cells used by Breivik at Ila Prison; later the same week the members of the court inspected the prison facilities used by Breivik at Skien Prison.

On 15 March, the Oslo District Court convened inside Skien Prison. After his handcuffs were removed upon his arrival, Breivik faced the gallery and performed a Nazi salute. One judge said that Breivik's salute seemed disruptive, "therefore I wish that you do not do it again". Øystein Storrvik, the head of Breivik's legal team, told the court about Breivik's letter of complaint to the government in 2012 which detailed being awakened by flashlight as often as every half-hour.

Cross-examination of witnesses

Randi Rosenqvist, a psychiatrist at Ila Prison, was cross-examined by Storrvik. Storrvik asked if she had suggested visits without a glass wall; Rosenqvist replied: "Yes I have discussed this. I have been thinking that visits without a glass wall could be something . I don't think that with his image, he would be violent to someone he has a relationship to." Storrvik read out loud recommendations by Rosenqvist, including "Retired police officers could, for example, come , drink coffee, play games".

Later, Storrvik introduced a report from the "prevention section" at the office of the Parliamentary Ombudsman, dated 11 November 2015, regarding a series of visits that year by the ombudsman; the report said that Breivik was being held at a section where sometimes there was only one prisoner. Storrvik read from the report that "The limitations on visits at the time of the inspection seemed quite strict". He said that in that section of the prison, it should expand the planned fellowship or community between prisoners and employees and consider other measures to minimise the risk of isolation damage. At that section, the prison should evaluate alternative possibilities for recreation in fresh air, in addition to the concrete exercise yard. The report recommended that the prison should discontinue the visual surveillance of health-related conversations that occur with a glass wall between prisoners and health personnel.

The second witness was Knut Bjarkeid, Chief Warden at Ila Prison. Storrvik confronted Bjarkeid with a document regarding prison Section G being turned in part into a "particularly high-security department". He read: "There are obvious limits to how long he can be in Section G"; the document was written by Bjarkeid. Storrvik said: "The words are here, obviously there are limits to how long he shall be isolated. This was in 2012. He is still in total isolation". After Bjarkeid left the witness stand, the government's chief lawyer in the trial, Marius Emberland read out loud from a letter that Breivik had written, dated 29 September 2013. In the letter, Breivik reported several persons to the police; the Asker and Bærum Police District investigated and later dropped the investigation. Breivik's letter detailed the number of strip searches, "grip manoeuvres", and handcuffings he had undergone.

The next witness was Bjørn Draugedalen, a general practitioner working one day per week at Skien Prison. His first consultation with Breivik was held in a recreation room in a high-security unit. Draugedalen shook hands with Breivik, with five prison officers present; all the later consultations (until the trial) were held with a glass wall separating them. Storrvik asked: "This change, when another prisoner arrived , which resulted in Breivik's movement being restricted—did you consider to go up there to view how things were?" Draugedalen answered: "We have to deal with changes done by the Corrections Services". The judge interjected, saying that the Correction Services likely would listen to health care workers. Draugedalen replied "We did not see any extra value then, regarding visiting him in the section". Draugedalen said that he has not been notified that Breivik has discontinued his university studies.

The fourth witness was a doctor for prisoners at Ila Prison. Storrvik read from Breivik's medical record dated 5 February 2013 that Breivik intended to recreate less in fresh air because of the strip searches that follow. Storrvik asked: "The fact that he goes outside less, to avoid being strip-searched, was that discussed as a problem?" The physician answered: "No, that was not discussed in the health section". Later, the judge referred to nightly inspections every half hour, and the physician answered that he could not remember. Tore Stenshagen, a corrections officer (and section leader) at Skien Prison, testified that sometimes he sat down and talked with Breivik, and that they were accompanied by only one prison officer.

Closing arguments

Summing up the case for Breivik, Storrvik said: "For some reason, in Norway, it has been established that in a female prison, a male prison officer cannot strip search a prisoner, but in a male prison it is ok that females are present. This is offensive—I do not see any alternatives". He then talked about the case of strip searches of prisoner Piechowicz in Poland. In that case, the court was not convinced by the Polish government's arguments that the systematic, humiliating, daily searches were necessary to secure the prison. He continued: "He was also awoken at night, but he had 147 visits that compensated", and Piechowicz's isolation lasted for a shorter period; Storrvik said: "Note that one calls it isolation, even though he had one cellmate". Storrvik said that "the verdict Piechowicz vs. Poland point to a breach of ECHR in our case".

Storrvik said: "In my opinion, there is not a complete concurrence between risk analyses and measures in our case. Risk analyses have at an early stage come with suggestions for measures (...) For example, removing the glass wall during visits and the possibility of introducing fellow prisoner, has been discussed at such an early stage that there should be a good reason for why Rosenqvist's advice has not been followed". Storrvik said: "The main problem for the government in this case is that the discrepancies between well-founded—in the context of security—suggestions from one of those who knows this case the best has not been followed".

Storrvik compared Breivik's position as a Catch-22 situation: if Breivik says that he has psychiatric problems, then he has picked them out of a book; if he says that he does not have psychiatric problems, then he does not have psychiatric problems. Storrvik said that there had been no inspections by agencies tasked with oversight, as far as he knew, until the Parliamentary Ombudsman came. Breivik's lawyer referred to visual or manual body cavity searches; he disagreed with Emberland's view that there was a difference regarding anal inspection as referred to in ECHR verdicts in other cases, and the squats that Breivik must perform while naked; Storrvik's opinion is that Ila lacks specific reasons for all the inspections.

Mestad said: "The government's primary task is to protect its citizens. To let a convicted terrorist establish a network, is dangerous". Storrvik said Breivik's previous verdict "indicates a mental vulnerability. If that is not enough, Breivik appears—by my standards—confused in court". Storrvik added that "mental vulnerability is a very, very weak expression". Emberland said that "Storrvik is quoting from the dissenting opinions from verdicts of the ECHR"—at least as much as he is quoting the majority opinions of the verdicts.

Reactions to Breivik's testimony

Breivik's testimony about his ideology was described as incoherent. In Dagbladet, research advisor and psychologist Aina Sundt Gullhaugen said about prison superintendent Bjarkeid's opinion that Breivik was not one of the prisoners at Ila suffering from isolation:

And surely it is an ugly sight when humans in the basement at Ila smear feces on the walls and no longer are oriented about themselves, time or place. But those who think that Breivik is not suffering have made themselves unavailable for the documented pain that Anders partook in ... The problem is that Breivik ... expresses his affliction in a manner that does not get captured particularly well by diagnostics manuals. The type of fundamental relational and emotional deficiencies that Breivik was allowed to develop, usually results in that person ending up speaking a language that others do not recognise.

In Aftenposten, Ulrik Fredrik Malt said that "the mass murderer is mentally quite ill, and that's being undercommunicated".

Verdict in lower court, reactions to verdict, and loss on appeal

On 20 April 2016, District Court Judge Helen Andenæs Sekulic gave her verdict. The verdict said that the conditions of his imprisonment breached Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, but that Article 8 of the Convention had not been violated—confiscation of letters had been justified. The government was also ordered to pay 330,937.5 Norwegian kroner ($40,373) for the plaintiff's legal expenses incurred by the court case. Breivik could not receive the money, but his lawyer could upon the verdict being upheld. Breivik was not in any courtroom when he received the verdict; his copy of the verdict was faxed to the prison.

On 21 April 2016, news media said that Ole Kristoffer Borhaug, chief warden at Skien Prison, said that the prison regimen for Breivik would not be lightened, in part because the verdict has not been officially upheld, and there are regulations preventing high security prisoners from interacting with prisoners of other categories.

Two former convicts opined: Kjell Alrich Schumann said that the verdict is most importantly about the principles regarding the application of isolation in Norwegian prisons. He said: "The decisions are evaluated by an entity at the Correctional Service every six months, and they can use any kind of arguments. There is no oversight"; Sven-Eirik Utsi said that "isolation Norway has been criticised about for several decades ".

The government's chief lawyer in the trial, Marius Emberland, had voiced his opinion about the verdict before the appeal; his opinion was criticized by the leader of the Norwegian Judges' Association, Ingjerd Thune: "I clearly understand that many react. I have never heard a lawyer speak in that manner—ever. That was surprising"; lawyer Frode Sulland said that one gets the impression that Office of the Attorney General "does not respect the justice system, and they still think that they are right, even when the court thinks they are wrong"; Emberland eventually recognised that some of his verbal comments can be interpreted as arrogant, adding that "they really were not meant that way".

Legal scholar Mads Andenæs, said that "The appeal has no bearing on the responsibility of the government to evaluate and make the changes that the verdict of Oslo District Court imposes on the government. This results directly from Norwegian Law and practices of ECtHR."

In August, media said that Storrvik claims that the judge is partial; the judge was recused. The appeal was heard in Borgarting Court of Appeal (convening within the prison), in January 2017; Breivik came to court without handcuffs. Storrvik made comparisons with verdicts at European Court of Human Rights, including the case of the leader of Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) (Abdullah Öcalan). The verdict, stated that solitary confinement did not violate Breivik's rights, and all recommendations were voided. In 2017, Norway's Supreme Court decided not to hear the case.

2022 criminal trial

In 2022, there was a criminal trial; before the trial, the authorities had recommended to not support his petition for parole. The trial did not charge him with any new crimes.

In January, the three-day trial started at Telemark District Court—in a makeshift courtroom in Skien Prison—to decide whether to reverse or uphold the District Attorney's refusal of parole. The indictment states that the prosecuting authority does not consent to parole because "preventive detention is deemed necessary to protect society". At the start of the trial, Breivik gave several Nazi salutes, to both the judge and the members of the public in the courtroom. Breivik testified that he is still a Nazi and will continue to work for White Power, but no longer wants to pursue it through violence. He says that he is trying to register a Nazi political party; he apparently is aspiring to be a candidate running for parliamentary election in Norway. Breivik's lawyer said that he wanted Breivik to serve his prison sentence together with one or more inmates; furthermore if that were to happen, then it would have to be with Philip Manshaus—because they would not injure each other.

On day two, Pär Öberg, a Swedish local politician belonging to the Nordic Resistance Movement, testified. The next witness was a psychiatrist, Randi Rosenqvist, who retired in 2020. She said that she had met with Breivik as late as May and June 2017. The court permitted that Breivik could interject a comment regarding the testimonies; Breivik said that Rosenqvist is not an expert on extremism. Breivik added that Rosenqvist said that he uses "a lot of time" on politics, however, Breivik commented that he used nearly all of his time on business plans and his studies.

The next witness was Emily Krokann—an advisor at the prison. She testified about a document that she did not write—about the prison's view that Breivik should not be paroled. Furthermore, she said that "repeatedly letters have been stopped, that were to persons he had no contact with before the acts of terrorism". Furthermore, she said that "letters to public figures have been stopped, because supporters might become inspired by the letters"; she also mentioned that Breivik used antidepressants. When asked by Breivik's lawyer if she could name anyone with whom Breivik had two-way (mail-mediated) communication, she replied "No".

The next witness was Espen Jambak, an assistant warden. He said that Breivik had permission to write letters to people he knew "before ". He said that he agreed that there was little "progresjon". Progresjon entails that the prisoner is given the possibility of gradually transferring to lower security conditions, up to and including serving the sentence as a parolee. Rehabilitation can be aided by giving room for "progresjon".

On day three, Storrvik said "it is a paradox that if a is treated so badly in prison that he never gets better, then he will never be released". He said that someone can do horrible things, without later, as an ex-con or parolee, trying to repeat it. "There is a goal that all punishment in Norway should have progresjon", Storrvik said during closing arguments, according to Anders Giæver. Breivik had not had physical contact with anyone except correction officers for the previous nine years, with his lawyer adding "that might be against regulations".

NRK's crime journalist, Olav Rønneberg, said that: "In other words, the opinion of Breivik's lawyer is that if there is no facilitation for improvements, then the regulations will be violated by the government to a degree where the courts will be forced to let him out sometime in the future".

The verdict said that Breivik appeared to be "obviously mentally disturbed, and with a mind that is difficult for other people to penetrate".

Reactions

Some psychiatrists watched media broadcasts from the trial and they claimed that Breivik appeared to be mentally ill. Tor Ketil Larsen, a professor of Psychiatry at the University of Bergen, claimed that Breivik appeared to be psychotic and delusional, and that medical treatment should be attempted with antipsychotics. Fred Heggen, a psychiatrist and chief physician at Gaustad Hospital, said that Breivik clearly displayed psychotic behavior and a psychotic way of thinking, and that Breivik "has a lack of reality that is pervasive, and it is dramatic".

Psychologist Pål Grøndahl stated that Breivik's personality was so fragmented, that he moved, psychologically speaking, at the edge of the states between various psychotic and personality disorders. Grøndahl went on to say that " throws forward odd ideas like that he was brainwashed in 2011, radicalised by descendents of German SS soldiers, and ordered by a right-wing 'collective' to re-establish the Third Reich, he sounds like a person that has a lacking sense of reality", and that "it is not difficult to notice statements from Breivik that are characteristic of psychosis."

Randi Rosenqvist, one of Norway's leading forensic psychiatrists and a psychiatrist for the Correctional Service, disagreed with comments that Breivik was psychotic, because although she thought Breivik's thoughts were "crazy" they were "completely down to earth", and that she believed he had autism. Rosenqvist stated in Aftenposten, she found he mostly functioned in a clearly non-psychotic manner.

Tor Langback, a lawyer, said that Breivik seems more insane now than during the criminal trial in 2012 and that Breivik's prison conditions were not exactly aiding the improvement of his mental health. In 2021, Aage Borchgrevink, a Norwegian author and literary critic, critiqued the press saying that "even after 77 burials ... the Norwegian press does not want to tell about the child abuse and psychiatric illness in Breivik's family".

2024 trial

On 8 January 2024, the court convened inside Breivik's prison; the lawsuit accuses the government of negatively affecting Breivik's mental health by depriving him of contact with others.

Breivik's lawyer said in court that Breivik has contact with two other inmates, through "controlled fellowship" for one hour every other week. At those times, several corrections officers are seated between these prisoners. Breivik also got a visit (in prison) from a Red Cross dog and its handler, "a while ago"; the dog was Breivik's only visitor in 12 years that has been allowed behind the bars in the room for visitation.

As part of its communication control of Breivik, he receives letters from people outside the prison, but he is not permitted to reply. The prison has also stopped attempts at correspondence with a prisoner that Breivik got acquainted with. In regard to a report last year from PST, Breivik is being implicated in cases where Breivik has had no contact with the involved persons, according to Breivik's lawyer.

On day two, the prosecution discussed how Breivik's two latest risk evaluations conclude that Breivik is still viewed as a great risk to others.

Breivik's testimony

Breivik started his testimony on day two replying to questions from his lawyer concerning the letters he receives, claiming that the letters are not political and that he has received "2,000" letters from people that want to become friends with him. Another media outlet quoted Breivik as saying "There are 4,000 that are awaiting my reply, but I am not allowed to send letters to anyone that I did not have contact with before 2011. Many years have passed since I had any meaningful relationships." He added that while it was true that the only people that wanted to be friends with him are rather conservative, that didn't make them Nazis.

Breivik what the prosecution said earlier (in the trial), and Breivik's lawyer interrupted and said: "Talk about the conditions under which you are serving your sentence. anything else would be to break through all limits"; Breivik said that he first and foremost wishes a pen pal; "That is what I have strived for, during the past 12 years. I have not had a meaningful pen-pal since 2012"; Breivik also suggested several ways that he could have contact with people: Tinder is one suggestion, and Breivik is open for idea that he would not need to use his (real) name (on Tinder); Breivik talked about his wish for an animal in his cell: he had petitioned for a dog or a goat or a miniature pig; Breivik received three birds—common parakeets (and they stay in the hallway outside his prison cell); Breivik said that "The birds were a signal to me, that I shall never receive meaningful relations—this is what you get"; Breivik said that the birds are better than nothing, but he wishes for a mammal.

Breivik testified that he is using antidepressants and that he is struggling with thoughts about taking his own life; with a voice that was choked (gråtkvalt) while crying, he talked about a life that was difficult to live. Another media outlet said that Breivik's lawyer said earlier that Breivik has lost his to live; when Breivik testified about that, Breivik cried; He touched his face and said that he is a human being, despite what he has done. Breivik said that "There are many pleasant people that work , but in the end it is not enough to be offered to" play cards. On several occasions, Breivik's lawyer must interrupt Breivik, and ask Breivik to answer the questions (that the lawyer is asking). One of the prosecuting attorneys asked how Breivik views "22 July"; Breivik replied that "I was radicalised over two years. I am very sorry about the actions. If this is my future, then I am willing to give up politics. But you say that it makes no difference, no matter what"; Breivik replied to other questions from one of the prosecuting attorneys: Breivik still has opinions that are Right Extreme.

A recent report by PST (that remained classified until the first day of trial), was referred to in court; In the report, Breivik is characterised as a saint in international circles of the Extreme Right; Breivik said that "PST is not saying that I am still dangerous, but they are saying that I have an inspirational effect. They are not accusing me anymore of having terrorist intentions any longer. Of course I am dangerous, but it is not I that is dangerous, it is the character about me that is being cultivated by the Extreme Right". Another news outlet said that Breivik agrees that he is still dangerous, but in his opinion that is something that he "does not get anything done about that", according to media; Media said that "Breivik's prison officers—daily write a log about what Breivik has done and said"; Kristoffer Nerland said the government's view is that much of what Breivik's lawyer said (on the previous day), is in the ballpark (omtrentlig) or inaccurate. They think that the conditions under which Breivik is serving his sentence is much better than what was said in court. Breivik's lawyer disagrees, and said that " the government is not listening. They are saying that we have launched a lawsuit so that Breivik will get to meet other inmates are killing—that is not true. Listen before you say that I am speaking untrue", Breivik's lawyer said to Nerland. Breivik's lawyer accused the prosecutor for doing other things, while Breivik's lawyer was presenting the case (during the previous day), and Breivik's lawyer said to the prosecutor: "Can you stop. You are ridiculing my lawsuit, also you have not been listening for what this lawsuit is actually about. These are difficult matters"; In the recess, his lawyer said that he (the lawyer) does not get to view all the documents of the case, but the government has access to all the documents.

Other things that Breivik said on the stand:

  • He replied to the judge, when asked about his occupation, that he is CEO of a political party called Nordic State.
  • He claims that he no longer is militant, and he would not have done the same today.

Breivik's lawyer showed the court, copies of two letters that the lawyer called private, and which (in the lawyer's opinion) should not have been confiscated by the prison authorities. One of the prosecuting attorneys did not want to say how many letters that the prison has confiscated.

Analysis of Breivik's testimony: Breivik appears different in this trial compared to the previous ones, according to Olav Rønneberg [no] (crime commentator at NRK); furthermore, gone are the propaganda and the Nazi salutes. Other reactions to Breivik's testimony: Breivik's lawyer said about that people who have had much contact with Breivik have not experienced him (as) depressed or suicidal: Breivik has expressed to the lawyer that Breivik "has problems finding the meaning with living on. He also wished to appear as a strong person that does not wish to show weakness"; Furthermore, "I know that his reactions are real. They are nothing but real. He has been medicated against depression consistently (konsekvent) the last years". Martine Aurdal reported that Breivik has "no credibility as a repenting sinner. But that is not the core this case"; furthermore, she reported that this trial is different, and that in the other trials Breivik was "spreading his propaganda, through right-wing salutes, symbols and messages".

Other information regarding Breivik (and surfacing during the trial): In one meeting with a prisoner , Breivik fried waffles and discussed World War II; that other prisoner was later released.

Cross-examination of witnesses

Day 3 of the trial: The chief of Ringerike Prison testified that the prison is steering toward easing the security around Breivik, and transferring him to ordinary lukket avdeling; furthermore, there is no schedule in regard to when that might happen.

An inspector at the prison testified that Breivik appears as a lederperson.

The prison guard in charge of the SHS section at the prison, said that "the employees" and Breivik always have dinner together. Furthermore, they have breakfast together on normal days. Furthermore, "Breivik says that he experiences the employees as family", according to that section leader.

Breivik stopped seeing the prison visitor in Q1 2023, and that person testified. (On the third day of trial, media revealed his name.) The prison visitor testified that Breivik and he met about 400 times and that the conversations lasted around 700 hours; he referred to Breivik as Anders; Earlier in the trial, Breivik said that it appeared that the visitor had a list of words that he could use to provoke Breivik with, including words such as child-killer; the witness, who is in his fifties, rejected Breivik's .

Day 4: a psychiatrist testified that she has counseled Breivik at the prison, 21 times and most of those since late summer 2023; she is a chief physician of a department at an public psychiatric clinic. A psychologist testified later.

Closing arguments

Closing arguments: Breivik's lawyer said that have the right to create relationships, keeping personal relationships.

Breivik's lawyer referred to the cases regarding two Italian mafia bosses that got lifetime sentences; furthermore, the first one was under a strict regime of isolation, yet he still was in a fellowship consisting of a couple of other prisoners, and he got family visits. one is Francesco Madonia (d. 2007). Furthermore, the other one, also got phone calls with his family, and he got out of isolation after 12 years; She added that Breivik had to wait for nine years, before he was even allowed to see another prisoner; furthermore, trial testimony has shown that there is no indication of an increase in fellowship in the near future.

Breivik's lawyer said that Breivik can not do anything about the symbolic power that one of the recent PST-reports, paints; furthermore, if the report were to lead the way in regard to Breivik's future, then this will last into eternity. Furthermore, when there has been no signs of violence or hostage taking, then the should ease-up on things like bars and stab-proof vests . Breivik wishes to exchange letters with people outside prison, including people that he had met in prison ; furthermore, Breivik's lawyer mentioned the letter that Breivik wanted to send to a former inmate (who was transferred to another prison); furthermore, the lawyer said that it is a letter between two people that had a personal relationship, and the letter is entirely without ideology or politics. In regard , Breivik wants an animal with fur .

Prosecuting attorney said that in the case of Salvatore Enea (from 2009), the verdict found no violation of paragraph 3 of ECHR.

Breivik's lawyer said in the final rebuttal, that was reported "for threats against prison guards and prison administrators" during a period last year; furthermore during that period Breivik had a pause in regard to his being medicated with fluoxetine the active ingredient of Prozac; the lawyer added that "I perceive that he broke down. He was in deep despair"; the lawyer added that he (the lawyer) feels that Breivik was treated in an inhumane manner, in that period.

Reactions

Olav Rønneberg, commentator at NRK, referred to "a headache for the . For how long can one hold" Breivik "almost completely [sic] isolated from contact with other prisoners?"; furthermore, Breivik "and his lawyers" think that Breivik is developing damages due to the conditions under which he is serving his prison sentence; furthermore, Breivik and have some support in previous verdicts —even though Breivik's previous lawsuit was rejected in the supreme court and in the human rights court in Strasbourg, both those courts made annotations; furthermore, the section (that deals with appeals, ankeutvalget) at the supreme court, wrote in its verdict that six years of isolation from other prisoners, is "extremely long", while from Strasbourg the annotation said that one can not isolate (a prisoner from other prisoners) for ever; furthermore, now Breivik has been in isolation for over twice as long (as the six years of isolation, which was the subject of the first lawsuit).

The view of Breivik's lawyer is, according to the media, that the Norwegian government is violating Breivik's human rights regarding prohibitions against torture and inhumane treatment, and for having violated Breivik's rights regarding personal life and family life.

The trial ended on 12 January 2024. On 15 February, it was determined his human rights were not being violated and he will still be kept under isolation. The trial in court of appeal, is scheduled for December 2024.

In April 2024, the court suggested that his trial regarding the possibility for parole, be postponed until November; The main lawyer of the government—in Breivik's 2024 lawsuit—had started a relationship with the psychologist who made the risk assessment of Breivik; That lawyer not handle the appeal. A new risk assessment was made by different experts.

Earlier, Breivik's lawyer had been informed by different sources that the major witness (psychologist Inni Rein) in Breivik's trial (in January), was in a relationship with the main lawyer of the government; Breivik's lawyer then demanded that a new pair of expert witnesses for the government to be appointed, as replacements; The government replaced the expert witnesses.

Day Two of the trial was on 19 November 2024.

Loss in criminal trial resulting from parole petition

Breivik testified (and was allotted 45 minutes). When asked about the name and other things, Breivik replied with a new name, and said that "You can also call me father"; the judge asked about "challenges involving himself"; Breivik replied that dissocial personality disorder involves all who are in prison. He does not have personality disorders. he will never become militant again.

Before Breivik's testimony, Breivik spoke with the press for two minutes. Breivik came into the courtroom, while displaying a piece of paper that had printed on it: "... Kelto-Germanic land back! ...", according to a photo from a Norwegian press service that has been published in at least one Norwegian newspaper.

Reactions to his testimony included two journalists from NRK claiming that his testimony seemed to be marked by grandiose ideas about his role in a cultural conservative ideology that Breivik faces - against the liberals. A new risk assessment about Breivik has been made by two experts that are not employed by the Department of Corrections. That report is more than 100 pages. Those two experts ."The three parakeets that Breivik had in" the corridor outside of his cell-for-sleeping, have been exchanged for new animals", Caviinae (marsvin), according to media; furthermore, the exchange was done shortly after the trial in early 2024.

Breivik lost the November trial; he can appeal. The three-day trial was held in Ringerike, Asker og Bærum District Court. The verdict from 2012, the 'starting point' (utgangspunkt) for this trial. Prisoners that do not have a release date - have (in theory), a right to petition for parole, every year.

December 2024 civil trial in appeals court

The trial started on 9 December 2024. Breivik is suing the government.

The lead prosecutor testified that one week earlier Breivik was permitted to make outgoing calls - to two approved persons, for "up to 60 minutes a week"; those two are a Norwegian woman who has made contact with Breivik; and a prisoner that has moved from Ringerrike Prison to another prison. Earlier, Breivik exchanged postal letters with "a woman from Austria".

Breivik to meeting the members of the court, on day one of the five-day trial; they were supposed to inspect his prison conditions; On the same day, there is an aim that Breivik on that day will get to testify in person (and in the prison gymnasium); however, media said in December that he will testify by videolink the appeals court in Oslo, on the first day of the trial. At least on the other days, the court will not convene in the prison, and Breivik will be able to take part in the trial, by video link; the authorities have cited saving money, as a main reason for where the court will be convening.

Breivik will not be transported out of the prison, and to Borgarting lagmannnsrett in Oslo. The government has cited saving money, as a main reason for not transporting Breivik. The exchange of pets, after the trial in January, will be a topic of this trial; Furthermore, Breivik's lawyer does not want to tell the media, the name of the pets because "the case is so sad for many people". The authorities have removed (from the case), the government's main lawyer from the January 2024 trial.

Financing of legal aid and family situation

Breivik is receiving pro bono legal aid (as of 2024) from the law firm of Øystein Storrvik—his lawyer since 2014. Previously, the firm of Geir Lippestad did pro bono representation of Breivik after the 2012 trial. Legal aid during criminal trials has been paid by the government, as is the norm in the country.

On 23 March 2013, Breivik's mother died from complications from cancer. On the same day media said that mother and son "took farewell during a meeting at Ila last week. Breivik was permitted to move himself out from behind the glass wall of the visit room—to give his mother a farewell hug". Breivik asked prison officials for permission to attend his mother's funeral service; permission was denied.

See also

List of longest prison sentences served

List of longest prison sentences

References

  1. Frode Sætran. "Trist at Breivik får tilbake arenaen" [Sad that Breivik receives the arena again]. Aftenposten.no. Retrieved 20 April 2016.
  2. "Nå vurderer Breivik likevel anke". Nrk.no. 26 April 2016. Retrieved 28 April 2016.
  3. ^ "'Judgment in the appeal case between The Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Breivik'". Domstol.no. Archived from the original on 24 September 2017. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
  4. "Judgment (case number 16-111749ASD-BORG/02)" (PDF). Retrieved 11 November 2021.
  5. ^ "Mass killer Breivik loses human rights case against Norway". Reuters. 1 March 2017. Retrieved 24 September 2017.
  6. ^ "Anders Behring Breivik, Killer in 2011 Norway Massacre, Says Prison Conditions Violate His Rights". The New York Times. 16 March 2016. Retrieved 20 April 2016.
  7. ^ "Breivik saksøkte Staten". NRK. 23 October 2015. Retrieved 20 April 2016.
  8. "Har rekonstruert Breiviks Ila-celler – NRK Norge – Oversikt over nyheter fra ulike deler av landet". Nrk.no. 14 March 2016. Retrieved 26 March 2016.
  9. ^ "Nytt avslag: Pressen får ikke bli med inn på cellen til Breivik". VG. 8 March 2016. Retrieved 20 April 2016.
  10. "Breivik gives Nazi salute in court return to challenge jail isolation – BBC News". Bbc.co.uk. 15 March 2016. Retrieved 15 March 2016.
  11. "Skjeggete Breivik viste nazi-hilsen". Vg.no. 10 January 2017. Retrieved 9 February 2022.
  12. "breivik til sak mot staten" [Breivik in a lawsuit against the government]. NRK. Retrieved 20 April 2016.
  13. "Heller ikke etter 800 ganger kunne de konstatere at jeg hadde noen gjenstand mellom rumpeballene – nyheter". Dagbladet.no. 15 March 2016. Retrieved 26 March 2016.
  14. "Lukkede dører under ABB-rettssak – NRK Nyheter". Nrk.no. 8 March 2016. Retrieved 26 March 2016.
  15. "ECHR" (PDF). Echr.coe.int. Retrieved 22 July 2016.
  16. Breivik suing the government "Storrvik: – Hovedproblemet for Staten i denne saken her er avvik mellom sikkerhetsmessige, godt funderte forslag fra en av dem som kjenner denne saken aller best, ikke er fulgt."
  17. Bjørgulv Braanen (19 March 2016). "I går var det tid for sluttprosedyrer. Ved veis ende". Klassekampen. p. 9.
  18. ^ Simen Tallaksen (19 March 2016). "Satser alt på ett kort". Klassekampen. p. 8.
  19. Hege Ulstein (19 March 2016). "Punktum". Retrieved 20 April 2016.
  20. "De som tror at Breivik ikke lider tar feil" [Those who think that Breivik does not suffer are wrong]. Dagbladet.no. 21 March 2016. Retrieved 20 April 2016.
  21. Ulrik Fredrik Malt. "Hån og latterliggjøring av et psykisk sykt menneske – Ulrik Fredrik Malt" [Scorn and ridicule of a mentally ill person]. Aftenposten. Retrieved 20 April 2016.
  22. Dennis Ravndal (20 April 2016). "Staten har krenket Breiviks menneskerettigheter" [The government has violated Breivik's human rights]. VG. Retrieved 20 April 2016.
  23. ^ "Oslo tingrett: Breivik utsatt for nedverdigende behandling" [Oslo District Court: Breivik exposed to degrading treatment]. NRK. 20 April 2016. Retrieved 20 April 2016.
  24. using an April 2016 conversion rate
  25. "Dette betyr dommen etter Breiviks søksmål – NRK Norge – Oversikt over nyheter fra ulike deler av landet". Nrk.no. 20 April 2016. Retrieved 25 April 2016.
  26. Tore Bergsaker (20 April 2016). "Sjokk, vantro og usannhet" [Shock, disbelief and untruth]. Dagbladet.no. Retrieved 28 April 2016.
  27. "Vil ikke endre soningsforhold for Breivik – NRK Telemark – Lokale nyheter, TV og radio". Nrk.no. 21 April 2016. Retrieved 25 April 2016.
  28. Dennis Ravndal (23 April 2016). "Utsi: Isolasjon er psykisk terror" [Utsi: Isolation is mental terror]. VG. Retrieved 28 April 2016.
  29. "Juristforbundet – Dommerforeningen". Archived from the original on 22 April 2016. Retrieved 28 April 2016.
  30. Andreas Slettholm. "Regjeringsadvokaten: Tingretten har lagt terskelen for lavt for hva som utgjør "umenneskelig eller nedverdigende behandling"" [Office of the Attorney General: The district court has laid the threshold too low for what constitutes "inhuman or demeaning treatment"]. Aftenposten. Retrieved 28 April 2016.
  31. Ådne HusSandnes (26 April 2016). "Fengselsmyndighetene har en plikt til å vurdere om Breivik kan sone med andre fanger" [The prison authorities have a duty to evaluate if Breivik kan do time with other prisoner]. Dagbladet.no. Retrieved 28 April 2016.
  32. "Breiviks advokat mener dommer er inhabil". Dagbladet. 5 August 2016.
  33. "Lagmannsretten: Dommer i Breivik-saken byttes ut". Verdens Gang (in Norwegian). 11 August 2016.
  34. ^ "Breiviks søksmål mot Staten". Nrk.no. 23 October 2015.
  35. "18. januar 2017 kl. 11:33 Storrvik gjennomgår andre dommer fra Den europeiske menneskerettsdomstolen (EMD) og sammenligner med Breiviks sak. Han sammenligner blant annet med en sak hvor EMD konkluderte med at menneskerettighetene til PKK-lederen Abdullah Öcalan var krenket fra det sjette til det tiende året i soningen. – Det som ble avgjørende for EMD, var at han deretter fikk andre medfanger han kunne være sammen med, sier"
  36. "Judgment (case number 16-111749ASD-BORG/02)" (PDF). Retrieved 11 November 2021.
  37. "Noway's top court rejects Anders Breivik appeal that his human rights are being violated". The Independent. 8 June 2017. Archived from the original on 2017-06-09. Retrieved 24 September 2017.
  38. Klesty, Victoria (2022-02-01). "Court rejects Norwegian mass killer Breivik's parole application". Reuters. Retrieved 2023-04-13.
  39. ^ "Breivik i fengsel". Nrk.no. 19 September 2013. Retrieved 9 February 2022.
  40. "Grandstanding fears as Norwegian mass killer seeks parole". Euronews.com. 18 January 2022. Retrieved 9 February 2022.
  41. ^ Breivik i fengsel . NRK.no. Retrieved 18 January 2022
  42. "Statsadvokaten mener Breivik er for farlig til å slippes ut". Dagsavisen.no. 2 January 2022. Retrieved 9 February 2022.
  43. "Breivik går til retten for å bli løslatt". Dagsavisen.no. 27 August 2021. Retrieved 9 February 2022.
  44. Lie, Kari (28 November 2021). "Terroristen sender brev til overlevende og etterlatte". Nrk.no. Retrieved 9 February 2022.
  45. NTB (2022-01-10). "Aktor ber retten nekte filming av Breiviks forklaring". VG (in Norwegian). Retrieved 2024-11-21.
  46. ^ Svein Vestrum Olsson et al. "Aktor om Breiviks forklaring". 18 January 2022. NRK.no
  47. ^ "Aktor: Hans soningsforhold er underordnet". Dagsavisen (in Norwegian). 2022-01-18. Retrieved 2024-11-21.
  48. Norwegian mass killer Anders Breivik appears before parole hearing. The Guardian. Retrieved 18 January 2022
  49. ^ NRK (2013-09-19). "Breivik i fengsel". NRK (in Norwegian Bokmål). Retrieved 2024-11-21.
  50. Rosenqvist: – Dette er en scene for ham . Retrieved 25 January 2022
  51. according to website veiviseren.no (a governmental one)
  52. "Vendepunktet – Tilbakeføringsarbeid i kriminalomsorgen". Veiviseren.no. P. 13
  53. "Djevelens advokat". Vg.no. 20 January 2022. Retrieved 9 February 2022.
  54. ^ Rønneberg, Olav (2022-01-20). "Breiviks advokat kan ha et poeng". NRK (in Norwegian Bokmål). Retrieved 2024-01-13.
  55. Mæland, NTB, Kjetil (1 February 2022). "Breivik slipper ikke ut: – Blottet for empati". Nettavisen.no. Retrieved 9 February 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  56. "Nyhetsstudio – Breivik-dommen kommer i dag". Dagbladet.no. Retrieved 9 February 2022.
  57. Olsson, Svein Vestrum (1 February 2022). "Breivik holdes i fengsel – anker avgjørelsen". Nrk.no. Retrieved 9 February 2022.
  58. ^ Ertesvåg, NTB, Edvard Ruggesæter (3 February 2022). "Rettsprofessor: – Om Breivik var psykisk syk, kan han ha blitt utsatt for justismord". Nettavisen.no. Retrieved 9 February 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  59. Psykiatere reagerer etter rettssaken: Mener terroristen må få behandling og medisiner for psykose.. Aftenposten. Retrieved 3 February 2022
  60. "Det er svært sannsynlig at 22. juli-terroristen har en vrangforestillingslidelse". aftenposten.no (in Norwegian Bokmål). 2022-03-22. Retrieved 2023-04-13.
  61. ^ ""En [...] hypotese er at han er så personlighetsmessig oppløst og fragmentert at han beveger seg, psykisk sett, i ytterkanten av de tilstandene som er trukket opp mellom psykoselidelser og personlighetsforstyrrelse"". www.aftenposten.no (in Norwegian Bokmål). 2022-02-08. Retrieved 2024-11-21.
  62. "Det er lett å være enig i at Breivik fremstår som gal. Men mye er vanvittig i denne verden". www.aftenposten.no (in Norwegian Bokmål). 2022-02-09. Retrieved 2024-11-21.
  63. ""Gjerningsmannen var ikke fra en annen planet, men hadde gått på samme skole som broren min"". www.aftenposten.no (in Norwegian Bokmål). 2021-06-21. Retrieved 2024-11-21.
  64. ^ Haraldsen, Stian (2024-01-09). "Har saksøkt staten: Breivik ble flere ganger avbrutt av egen advokat". NRK (in Norwegian Bokmål). Retrieved 2024-01-13.
  65. "Staten om Breiviks anklager: – Ikke i nærheten". vg.no (in Norwegian Bokmål). 2024-01-08. Retrieved 2024-01-13.
  66. ^ Haraldsen, Stian (2024-01-08). "Breivik gjorde ingen hilsener da rettssaken startet". NRK (in Norwegian Bokmål). Retrieved 2024-01-13.
  67. ^ Aurdal, Martine (2024-01-09). "Håpløshetens logikk". dagbladet.no (in Norwegian). Retrieved 2024-01-13.
  68. ^ "Breivik avbrutt av egen advokat: – Snakk om soningsforholdene". vg.no (in Norwegian Bokmål). 2024-01-09. Retrieved 2024-01-13.
  69. ^ Rønneberg, Olav (2024-01-09). "Statens evige hodepine". NRK (in Norwegian Bokmål). Retrieved 2024-01-13.
  70. ^ Hageskal, Ralf Lofstad, Maja Walberg Klev, Emma Thingstad Dalen, Audun (2024-01-10). "- Beklagelig å høre". dagbladet.no (in Norwegian). Retrieved 2024-01-13.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  71. Aurdal, Martine (2024-01-10). "Ingen gråter med Breivik". dagbladet.no (in Norwegian). Retrieved 2024-01-13.
  72. ^ AS, TV 2 (2024-01-10). "Fengselet: Dette er planen for Breivik". TV 2 (in Norwegian Bokmål). Retrieved 2024-01-13.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  73. "Nettavisen". Nettavisen (in Norwegian). Retrieved 2024-01-13.
  74. ^ Ighoubah, Farid (2024-01-10). "Anders Behring Breivik vraket besøksvenn gjennom ni år på telefon fra fengselet". Nettavisen (in Norwegian). Retrieved 2024-01-13.
  75. "Advokat mener PSTs Breivik-rapport fører til brudd på menneskerettighetene". vg.no (in Norwegian Bokmål). 2024-01-11. Retrieved 2024-01-13.
  76. Barka, Vetle Ravn Viken, Farid Ighoubah, Even Hye T. (2024-01-04). "Breivik saksøker staten". Nettavisen (in Norwegian). Retrieved 2024-01-13.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  77. ^ Haraldsen, Stian (2024-01-11). "Breivik-advokater brukte mafia-eksempel i retten". NRK (in Norwegian Bokmål). Retrieved 2024-01-13.
  78. ^ Klev, Ralf Lofstad, Maja Walberg (2024-01-11). "- Jeg er veldig narsissistisk". dagbladet.no (in Norwegian). Retrieved 2024-01-13.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  79. ^ Solberg, Ralf Lofstad, Lars Eivind Bones, Maja Walberg Klev, Anabelle Bruun, Tobias Fjeldvang, Kristoffer (2024-01-12). "- Han brøt sammen". dagbladet.no (in Norwegian). Retrieved 2024-01-13.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  80. Viken, Farid Ighoubah, Vetle Ravn (2024-01-09). "Anders Behring Breivik ble anbefalt å lese Se og Hør i fengsel". Nettavisen (in Norwegian). Retrieved 2024-01-13.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  81. "Norway court says mass killer Breivik's prison isolation not 'inhumane'". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 2024-02-22.
  82. Solheim, Eric Kjerstad (2024-05-27). "Aftenposten: Anders Behring Breivik får ny rettssak". VG (in Norwegian). Retrieved 2024-08-07.
  83. "Breiviks rettssak om prøveløslatelse utsettes". Dagsavisen (in Norwegian). 2024-04-19. Retrieved 2024-11-21.
  84. ^ NTB (2024-11-14). "Ny erklæring om Breivik – sentralt bevis i løslatelsessaken". Nettavisen (in Norwegian). Retrieved 2024-11-21.
  85. ^ Widerøe, Rolf J.; Røsvik, Eirik (2024-04-19). "Forhold utløser ny sikkerhetsvurdering av Anders Behring Breivik - sak utsettes". VG (in Norwegian). Retrieved 2024-11-21.
  86. NTB (2024-05-02). "Prøveløslatelse av Breivik for retten i november". VG (in Norwegian). Retrieved 2024-11-21.
  87. Revheim-Rafaelsen, Mathias (2023-08-18). "Anders Behring Breivik saksøker staten på nytt". NRK (in Norwegian Bokmål). Retrieved 2024-02-22.
  88. NTB -, Farid Ighoubah (2024-11-19). "Anders Behring Breivik hadde Russland-støtte barbert på hodet". Nettavisen (in Norwegian). Retrieved 2024-11-21.
  89. ^ Wilthil, Jan-Erik (2024-11-19). "Anders Behring Breivik begjærer seg prøveløslatt for andre gang". NRK (in Norwegian Bokmål). Retrieved 2024-11-21.
  90. ^ Ighoubah, Farid (2024-11-19). "Breivik om isolasjon i fengsel: – Verre enn døden". Nettavisen (in Norwegian). Retrieved 2024-11-22.
  91. ^ https://www.vg.no/nyheter/i/Vzoa6V/breiviks-soningsforhold-opp-til-ny-vurdering-undulater-er-byttet-ut-med-marsvin. VG.no. Retrieved 2024-12-05
  92. https://www.nettavisen.no/nyheter/anders-behring-breivik-byttet-ut-undulatene-han-hadde-pa-cellen-med-to-marsvin/s/5-95-2140726#:~:text=Mens%20marsvin%20er%20roligere%20og,for%20ham%2C%20forklarer%20Storrvik%20kort.&text=%E2%80%93%20Man%20skj%C3%B8nte%20at%20det%20ikke%20fungerte%20med%20fuglene.&text=Brevik%20skal%20ha%20f%C3%A5tt%20de,gikk%20i%20januar%20i%20%C3%A5r. Nettavisen.no. Retrieved 2024-11-28
  93. "Norwegian court rejects mass killer Anders Behring Breivik's 2nd bid for parole". Associated Press. 5 December 2024. Retrieved 5 December 2024.
  94. https://www.nettavisen.no/nyheter/anders-behring-breivik-ma-fortsatt-sitte-i-forvaring/s/5-95-2168312. Nettavisen.no. Retrieved 2024-12-04
  95. ^ https://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/viser-til-nye-venninner/82360277. Dagbladet.no. Retrieved 2024-12-11
  96. ^ Ighoubah, Farid (2024-07-11). "Staten sparer millionbeløp – derfor får ikke Anders Behring Breivik viljen sin". Nettavisen (in Norwegian). Retrieved 2024-08-07.
  97. "Breiviks kamp bak murene". vg.no (in Norwegian Bokmål). 2021-07-13. Retrieved 2024-01-13.
  98. Andreas Slettholm (31 January 2014). "Behring Breivik har fått avslag – får ikke gratis advokat". Aftenposten.no. Retrieved 22 July 2016.
  99. "Ikke bruk Breivik som sponsorobjekt" [Do not use Breivik as an object of sponsoring]. Dagbladet.no. 12 March 2016. Retrieved 20 April 2016.
  100. "Breiviks mor døde i går – VG Nett om Terrorangrepet 22. juli". VG. 23 March 2013. Retrieved 13 September 2014.
  101. "Moren tok farvel med Breivik i fengselet – VG Nett om Terrorangrepet 22. juli". VG. 23 March 2013. Retrieved 13 September 2014.
  102. "Breivik: Killer Asks To Attend Mother's Funeral". Sky News. Retrieved 13 September 2014.
  103. "Breivik denied permission to attend mother's funeral". Telegraph.co.uk. 26 March 2013. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2014.
2011 Norway attacks
Main
Legacy
Places
Trial
Defence
Prosecution
Judges
Related
Neo-Nazism
Groups
Extant
Germany
and Austria
Europe
International
Defunct
Germany
and Austria
Europe
International
People
Category
Categories:
Post-2012 legal history of Anders Breivik Add topic