Misplaced Pages

London Underground Ltd v Edwards (No 2)

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

London Underground Ltd v Edwards (No 2)
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal

London Underground Ltd v Edwards (No 2) IRLR 157 is a leading discrimination case relevant for UK labour law, concerning objective justification of indirect discrimination.

Facts

Ms Edwards, a single parent, could not keep up child care after the Underground altered its shift system. She had worked as a train driver for ten years.

The Tribunal held that they could have ‘easily, without losing the objectives of their plan and reorganisation, accommodated the applicant who was a long-serving employee… They did not address themselves to these issues’

Judgment

Morison J dismissed the employer's appeal. ‘It may be that London Underground would have wished to implement the single parent link but gave in to pressure from their predominantly male workforce.’ First, he said, ‘the more clear it is that the employers unreasonably failed to show flexibility in their employment practices, the more willing the tribunal should be to make a finding of unlawful discrimination.’ Second, employers can change rosters, but ‘should carefully consider the impact which a new roster might have on a section of their workforce.’ Third, nothing said here ‘should be construed as favouring positive discrimination.’

See also

Direct discrimination cases
Equality Act 2010 ss 13 and 136
Stefanko v Doherty and Maritime Hotel Ltd IRLR 322
Horsey v Dyfed County Council ICR 755
R (EOC) v Birmingham City Council AC 1155
James v Eastleigh BC UKHL 6
Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (No 2) UKHL 13
Smith v Safeway plc ICR 868
Grant v South-West Trains Ltd ICR 449 (C-249/96)
Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police v Khan UKHL 48
Shamoon v Royal Ulster Constabulary UKHL 11
Roma Rights Centre v Prague Immigration UKHL 55
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire UKSC 15
Coleman v Attridge Law (2008) C-303/06
English v Sanderson Blinds Ltd EWCA Civ 1421
Grainger plc v Nicholson IRLR 4 (EAT)
see UK labour and equality law
Sources on justifying discrimination
Equality Act 2010 Sch 9
Etam plc v Rowan IRLR 150
Johnston v Royal Ulster Constabulary (1986) C-222/84
R (Amicus) v SS for Trade and Industry EWHC 860
Sirdar v The Army Board (1999) C-273/97
Kreil v Germany (2000) C-285/98
Lambeth LBC v Commission for Racial Equality ICR 768
Tottenham Green Nursery v Marshall (No 2) ICR 320
Equality Act 2010 s 19(2)(d)
Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber von Hartz (1984) C-170/84
Kontofunktionaerernes Forbund v Danfoss (1989) C-109/88
Rinner-Kühn v FWW Gebäudereinigung KG (1989) C-171/88
Nimz v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (1991) C-184/89
Kutz-Bauer v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (2003) C-187/00
Allonby v Accrington & Rossendale College (2004) C-256/01
see UK labour law

Notes

References

Categories:
London Underground Ltd v Edwards (No 2) Add topic