Misplaced Pages

Ideal quotient

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Ideal quotient" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (September 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Not to be confused with the quotient of a ring by an ideal.

In abstract algebra, if I and J are ideals of a commutative ring R, their ideal quotient (I : J) is the set

( I : J ) = { r R r J I } {\displaystyle (I:J)=\{r\in R\mid rJ\subseteq I\}}

Then (I : J) is itself an ideal in R. The ideal quotient is viewed as a quotient because K J I {\displaystyle KJ\subseteq I} if and only if K ( I : J ) {\displaystyle K\subseteq (I:J)} . The ideal quotient is useful for calculating primary decompositions. It also arises in the description of the set difference in algebraic geometry (see below).

(I : J) is sometimes referred to as a colon ideal because of the notation. In the context of fractional ideals, there is a related notion of the inverse of a fractional ideal.

Properties

The ideal quotient satisfies the following properties:

  • ( I : J ) = A n n R ( ( J + I ) / I ) {\displaystyle (I:J)=\mathrm {Ann} _{R}((J+I)/I)} as R {\displaystyle R} -modules, where A n n R ( M ) {\displaystyle \mathrm {Ann} _{R}(M)} denotes the annihilator of M {\displaystyle M} as an R {\displaystyle R} -module.
  • J I ( I : J ) = R {\displaystyle J\subseteq I\Leftrightarrow (I:J)=R} (in particular, ( I : I ) = ( R : I ) = ( I : 0 ) = R {\displaystyle (I:I)=(R:I)=(I:0)=R} )
  • ( I : R ) = I {\displaystyle (I:R)=I}
  • ( I : ( J K ) ) = ( ( I : J ) : K ) {\displaystyle (I:(JK))=((I:J):K)}
  • ( I : ( J + K ) ) = ( I : J ) ( I : K ) {\displaystyle (I:(J+K))=(I:J)\cap (I:K)}
  • ( ( I J ) : K ) = ( I : K ) ( J : K ) {\displaystyle ((I\cap J):K)=(I:K)\cap (J:K)}
  • ( I : ( r ) ) = 1 r ( I ( r ) ) {\displaystyle (I:(r))={\frac {1}{r}}(I\cap (r))} (as long as R is an integral domain)

Calculating the quotient

The above properties can be used to calculate the quotient of ideals in a polynomial ring given their generators. For example, if I = (f1, f2, f3) and J = (g1, g2) are ideals in k, then

I : J = ( I : ( g 1 ) ) ( I : ( g 2 ) ) = ( 1 g 1 ( I ( g 1 ) ) ) ( 1 g 2 ( I ( g 2 ) ) ) {\displaystyle I:J=(I:(g_{1}))\cap (I:(g_{2}))=\left({\frac {1}{g_{1}}}(I\cap (g_{1}))\right)\cap \left({\frac {1}{g_{2}}}(I\cap (g_{2}))\right)}

Then elimination theory can be used to calculate the intersection of I with (g1) and (g2):

I ( g 1 ) = t I + ( 1 t ) ( g 1 ) k [ x 1 , , x n ] , I ( g 2 ) = t I + ( 1 t ) ( g 2 ) k [ x 1 , , x n ] {\displaystyle I\cap (g_{1})=tI+(1-t)(g_{1})\cap k,\quad I\cap (g_{2})=tI+(1-t)(g_{2})\cap k}

Calculate a Gröbner basis for t I + ( 1 t ) ( g 1 ) {\displaystyle tI+(1-t)(g_{1})} with respect to lexicographic order. Then the basis functions which have no t in them generate I ( g 1 ) {\displaystyle I\cap (g_{1})} .

Geometric interpretation

The ideal quotient corresponds to set difference in algebraic geometry. More precisely,

  • If W is an affine variety (not necessarily irreducible) and V is a subset of the affine space (not necessarily a variety), then
I ( V ) : I ( W ) = I ( V W ) {\displaystyle I(V):I(W)=I(V\setminus W)}
where I ( ) {\displaystyle I(\bullet )} denotes the taking of the ideal associated to a subset.
Z ( I : J ) = c l ( Z ( I ) Z ( J ) ) {\displaystyle Z(I:J)=\mathrm {cl} (Z(I)\setminus Z(J))}
where c l ( ) {\displaystyle \mathrm {cl} (\bullet )} denotes the Zariski closure, and Z ( ) {\displaystyle Z(\bullet )} denotes the taking of the variety defined by an ideal. If I is not radical, then the same property holds if we saturate the ideal J:
Z ( I : J ) = c l ( Z ( I ) Z ( J ) ) {\displaystyle Z(I:J^{\infty })=\mathrm {cl} (Z(I)\setminus Z(J))}
where ( I : J ) = n 1 ( I : J n ) {\displaystyle (I:J^{\infty })=\cup _{n\geq 1}(I:J^{n})} .

Examples

  • In Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} } we have ( ( 6 ) : ( 2 ) ) = ( 3 ) {\displaystyle ((6):(2))=(3)} .
  • In algebraic number theory, the ideal quotient is useful while studying fractional ideals. This is because the inverse of any invertible fractional ideal I {\displaystyle I} of an integral domain R {\displaystyle R} is given by the ideal quotient ( ( 1 ) : I ) = I 1 {\displaystyle ((1):I)=I^{-1}} .
  • One geometric application of the ideal quotient is removing an irreducible component of an affine scheme. For example, let I = ( x y z ) , J = ( x y ) {\displaystyle I=(xyz),J=(xy)} in C [ x , y , z ] {\displaystyle \mathbb {C} } be the ideals corresponding to the union of the x,y, and z-planes and x and y planes in A C 3 {\displaystyle \mathbb {A} _{\mathbb {C} }^{3}} . Then, the ideal quotient ( I : J ) = ( z ) {\displaystyle (I:J)=(z)} is the ideal of the z-plane in A C 3 {\displaystyle \mathbb {A} _{\mathbb {C} }^{3}} . This shows how the ideal quotient can be used to "delete" irreducible subschemes.
  • A useful scheme theoretic example is taking the ideal quotient of a reducible ideal. For example, the ideal quotient ( ( x 4 y 3 ) : ( x 2 y 2 ) ) = ( x 2 y ) {\displaystyle ((x^{4}y^{3}):(x^{2}y^{2}))=(x^{2}y)} , showing that the ideal quotient of a subscheme of some non-reduced scheme, where both have the same reduced subscheme, kills off some of the non-reduced structure.
  • We can use the previous example to find the saturation of an ideal corresponding to a projective scheme. Given a homogeneous ideal I R [ x 0 , , x n ] {\displaystyle I\subset R} the saturation of I {\displaystyle I} is defined as the ideal quotient ( I : m ) = i 1 ( I : m i ) {\displaystyle (I:{\mathfrak {m}}^{\infty })=\cup _{i\geq 1}(I:{\mathfrak {m}}^{i})} where m = ( x 0 , , x n ) R [ x 0 , , x n ] {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {m}}=(x_{0},\ldots ,x_{n})\subset R} . It is a theorem that the set of saturated ideals of R [ x 0 , , x n ] {\displaystyle R} contained in m {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {m}}} is in bijection with the set of projective subschemes in P R n {\displaystyle \mathbb {P} _{R}^{n}} . This shows us that ( x 4 + y 4 + z 4 ) m k {\displaystyle (x^{4}+y^{4}+z^{4}){\mathfrak {m}}^{k}} defines the same projective curve as ( x 4 + y 4 + z 4 ) {\displaystyle (x^{4}+y^{4}+z^{4})} in P C 2 {\displaystyle \mathbb {P} _{\mathbb {C} }^{2}} .

References

  1. David Cox; John Little; Donal O'Shea (1997). Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms: An Introduction to Computational Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra. Springer. ISBN 0-387-94680-2., p.195
  2. Greuel, Gert-Martin; Pfister, Gerhard (2008). A Singular Introduction to Commutative Algebra (2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag. p. 485. ISBN 9783642442544.
  • M.F.Atiyah, I.G.MacDonald: 'Introduction to Commutative Algebra', Addison-Wesley 1969.
Category:
Ideal quotient Add topic