This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:
- 06:53, 6 February 2015 MastCell talk contribs blocked Is not a talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Abusing multiple accounts: obvious sockpuppet, being used to evade scrutiny and segregate contentious contributions in violation of WP:SOCK)
6 February 2015
- 21:1421:14, 6 February 2015 diff hist +121 User talk:Is not a →Blocked indefinitely: Clashes with blocking administrator, diff of "apology"
- 21:0621:06, 6 February 2015 diff hist +493 User talk:Is not a →Blocked indefinitely: C's post at ANI about past clashes with blocking administrator
- 11:2511:25, 6 February 2015 diff hist +109 User talk:Is not a →Response by an administrator: {{ping|PhilKnight}} {{ygm}} ~~~~
- 10:3410:34, 6 February 2015 diff hist +72 User talk:Is not a →Appeal: contrary to facts
- 10:2810:28, 6 February 2015 diff hist +398 User talk:Is not a →Appeal: false accusation and your repetition of it simply ignores my editing history. Ãlso, I have already been falsly accused by a closed SPI case. You should stop accusing me of being a sockpuppet. If you have evidence, then let's hear it.
- 10:2510:25, 6 February 2015 diff hist +92 User talk:Is not a →Appeal: :::Please review this appeal, or remove your notice to avoid prejudicing the appeal
- 10:2410:24, 6 February 2015 diff hist +188 User talk:Is not a →Appeal: Challenging the accusations in a block suffice for an appeal. One does not need to agree with false accusations, as a matter of policy, of course.
- 10:2210:22, 6 February 2015 diff hist +268 User talk:Is not a →Appeal: The appeal is in the section labeled "'''Appeal'''". Legibility more important than bureaucracy
- 10:1510:15, 6 February 2015 diff hist +735 User talk:Is not a →Appeal: Now I am accused of damage to Misplaced Pages?
- 09:4609:46, 6 February 2015 diff hist +178 User talk:Is not a →Appeal: accused me of "WP:GHBH", which links to "disruptive editing or vandalism", falsehoods that of course cannot be supported by evidence.
- 09:1509:15, 6 February 2015 diff hist +314 User talk:Is not a →Appeal: when he tried to justify his block . He certainly presented no evidence of my being a sockpuppet, so I won't waste time de
- 09:0509:05, 6 February 2015 diff hist +5 m User talk:Is not a →Appeal: been
- 09:0409:04, 6 February 2015 diff hist +30 m User talk:Is not a →Appeal: Thanks for vouching for me. Also insert "by"
- 08:4208:42, 6 February 2015 diff hist +1 User talk:Is not a →Appeal
- 08:3808:38, 6 February 2015 diff hist 0 User talk:Is not a →Appeal
- 08:3508:35, 6 February 2015 diff hist +16 m User talk:Is not a →Appeal
- 08:3408:34, 6 February 2015 diff hist +28 m User talk:Is not a →Appeal
- 08:3208:32, 6 February 2015 diff hist +132 User talk:Is not a →Appeal
- 08:3008:30, 6 February 2015 diff hist +52 User talk:Is not a →Appeal: 2way IBAN would be helpful
- 08:2808:28, 6 February 2015 diff hist 0 User talk:Is not a →Appeal: {{user|Rjensen}} was intended, not RJensen
- 08:2508:25, 6 February 2015 diff hist +4,670 User talk:Is not a →Blocked indefinitely: appeal
- 07:3007:30, 6 February 2015 diff hist +144 User talk:Is not a →Blocked indefinitely: If you <s>have evidence</s> want to test the veracity of your unsubstantiated accusation and have any cover when others question your misuse of administrative tools, you can file a second SPI. The first SPI was closed as a joke
- 07:1107:11, 6 February 2015 diff hist +304 User talk:Is not a →Blocked indefinitely: If you have evidence, you can file a second SPI. The first SPI was closed as a joke, if I may remind editors (at danger of violating Gamaliel's unauthorized IBAN). :I get tired of defending myself against bad-faith allegations.
- 06:3406:34, 6 February 2015 diff hist +215 Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Unilateral IBAN imposed by one administrator: How am I supposed to answer Gamaliel's inappropriate question while I am allegedly topic banned? I prefer not to be indefinitely blocked.
- 06:2906:29, 6 February 2015 diff hist +496 User talk:SlimVirgin →BLP: Robert Kagan: reply
- 06:2706:27, 6 February 2015 diff hist +213 Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →Neoconservativism - Victoria Nuland
- 06:2106:21, 6 February 2015 diff hist +547 Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Unilateral IBAN imposed by one administrator: Focus on the issue. The administrator announced a BAN without authority, for example consensus at a discussion at ANI.
5 February 2015
- 23:4523:45, 5 February 2015 diff hist +9 User:Is not a →top
- 12:0412:04, 5 February 2015 diff hist +193 Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →Robert Kagan: There are ongoing discussions at several boards (look below) and articles, for which this discussion is useful here. ~~~~
- 12:0212:02, 5 February 2015 diff hist +14,342 Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard undo, ongoing related discussions
- 10:4210:42, 5 February 2015 diff hist +23 User talk:Is not a →top
- 10:4110:41, 5 February 2015 diff hist −419 User talk:Is not a →Towards an improved article on the website and for its use on BLPs: WP:REMOVED
- 09:1409:14, 5 February 2015 diff hist +822 Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Gamaliel and Binksternet: '''Motion''': Gamaliel's unilateral one-sided IBAN is void. Gamaliel or another editor is welcome to propose such a ban to be discussed by the community at ANI. '''Support''': Gamaliel's ban was improper because individual
- 07:0707:07, 5 February 2015 diff hist +134 Talk:Robert Kagan →Discussion: Please strike the erroneous "conservative" in the motion. ~~~~
- 07:0307:03, 5 February 2015 diff hist +454 User talk:Gamaliel →One-sided Iban: Your authority: new section
- 01:2801:28, 5 February 2015 diff hist +237 Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Gamaliel and Binksternet: In particular, Interaction Bans are supposed to be imposed by a community consensus. Gamaliel did not have the authority to impose a one-way interaction ban.
- 01:1901:19, 5 February 2015 diff hist +117 Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Freezerbox Magazine (freezerbox.com): Nope
- 01:1401:14, 5 February 2015 diff hist +1,535 Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Right Web as external link: Weak sources, poor scholarship
4 February 2015
- 23:1423:14, 4 February 2015 diff hist +25 Talk:Robert Kagan →RfC regarding external links: anti-"militarist" replaces "conservative", which is an obvious error
- 23:1223:12, 4 February 2015 diff hist +1,567 Talk:Robert Kagan →Discussion: What's next, the John Birch Society's research reports?
- 18:5818:58, 4 February 2015 diff hist +445 User talk:Is not a →Towards an improved article on the website and for its use on BLPs: Notice maybe should stay
- 18:5318:53, 4 February 2015 diff hist +8 User talk:Is not a →Towards an improved article on the website and for its use on BLPs
- 18:5218:52, 4 February 2015 diff hist −10,542 User talk:Is not a Listen to the warn
- 18:4018:40, 4 February 2015 diff hist +25 User talk:SlimVirgin →BLP: Robert Kagan: https://archive.org/details/nywikiconf_newyorkbrad_26july2009
- 16:4216:42, 4 February 2015 diff hist 0 m User talk:SlimVirgin →BLP: Robert Kagan: I not i. BTW complaints about "Jewish" categorisation date from 2008. "The Israel Lobby" is another issue
- 16:3516:35, 4 February 2015 diff hist −37 User:Is not a →Quotations: strange. i thought something was here before
- 16:1916:19, 4 February 2015 diff hist 0 m User talk:SlimVirgin →BLP: Robert Kagan
- 16:1716:17, 4 February 2015 diff hist +303 User talk:SlimVirgin →BLP: Robert Kagan: new section
- 16:0016:00, 4 February 2015 diff hist +14 User talk:Is not a →Towards an improved article on the website and for its use on BLPs
- 15:5915:59, 4 February 2015 diff hist +27 User talk:Is not a →Towards an improved article on the website and for its use on BLPs
 |