Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mattisse (talk | contribs) at 17:55, 12 August 2006 (→[]: format). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

New Blogism

• Hoax and nonsense. "New Blogism dates back to the Ancient Greeks" - Really? Check out the external link at bottom. Of course, I could be wrong. Mattisse(talk) 00:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Its better nonsense than we usually get though. — pd_THOR | 01:40, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Come back after you get out of crack rehab. --Xrblsnggt 01:52, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Whilst it would be a shame to loose this fine piece of pseudoacademise, there's no references, and wreaks of (whatever that word for invented new terms is) LinaMishima 02:26, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, unsourced, mostly WP:BALLS. --Kinu /_c 03:57, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable, non-sense, and unsourced. *~Daniel~* ☎ 04:21, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• LinaMishima – neologisms? Delete per Kinu. — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • ER • 06:52, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Don't Delete I would like to defend this piece. First of all, nothing in it is untruthful or nonsense in any way. Secondly, it DOES contain references. I know the term is not (yet?) widely used in the Anglo-American world, but then again I would like to remind you that there are millions of non-native english speakers who also make use of the english version of wiki simply because it's the largest. //edit: I removed the ancient Greek 'joke', you guys. Odoakerston, 12 August 2006
• Don't Delete I agree. Very informative and entertaining. Moreover, true in every sense.Deef Gutfreund, 12 August 2006 Comment added by User:85.147.135.20. Forged signature, no such user on Misplaced Pages. Weregerbil 11:48, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Odoakerston. the term is not (yet?) widely used in the Anglo-American world makes it a neologism if not a protologism on the en WP. I note that there are no interlanguage links on the article, nor does it exist on the nl wikipedia. And Deef_Gutfreund, Verifiability, not truth is the criterion. Tonywalton  | Talk 11:15, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Didn't make a nl entry since I figured most dutch people use the english version anyway. Did make one just now, though. --Odoakerston 11:38, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment user's second vote. Weregerbil 11:48, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Oops.
• Delete NCurse _work 14:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. -AMK152 15:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO, WP:NFT Ohconfucius 15:26, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep Percy Nobby Norton uses this very style on his blog nobbynorton.blogspot.com. I believe that this is an important style of writing and that it probably does date back to the ancient greek. However, the ultra-right wing nature of wikipedia will probably mean it will be deleted. What a shame. -- Bpazolli 15:53, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per the "ultra right wing conspiracy". Percy Nobby Norton is not notable, and "probably does tade back to the ancent greek (sic)" fails WP:V. Resolute 16:20, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Keep Keep Vis-a-vis the old "goes back to the Ancient Greeks"-controversy, I would like to remark that the claim might be slightly undersubstantialized, but then I would like to add that this is not really a problem, since we have to see it in its context of New Blogism. Blog-readers still largely prefer to consume texts that are written in the classical "claim-proof" structure, which principally reminds us of mathematics -- which in fact did originate with the Ancient Greeks, no question there. New Blogism is making the point that claim-proof is very much an outdated way of structuring a text and is substituting for it a revolutionary claim-claim-structure, which is currently finding its way upwards in all kinds of intromation (the spelling of this word is very much a topic of dispute) channels all over the world. Giannis Kouros 19:30, 12 August 2006 (CET)
• Don't deleteThough naturally there cannot be many references yet as it concerns such a new phenomenon, I believe it's necessary for a database as big and important as this one to also provide information about new and upcoming movements. The article will automatically become more substantial as time goes by.Leffe
• -- Leffe, you can't post at the top ahead of my nomination, so I have move your post here.