This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TopGun (talk | contribs) at 20:03, 3 July 2015 (→Topic-banned). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:03, 3 July 2015 by TopGun (talk | contribs) (→Topic-banned)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
.jpeg){kind=small} | Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers. |
If we were already talking on this page but the conversation is gone:
you'll find our conversation in one of the archives unless you were rude. You can revive it by creating a new discussion here and linking it to the archive and you can even move it back with attribution in edit summaries with a civil note (if you're comfortable with wiki markup).
If I have left you a message on your talk page, you can reply there, but remember to add a {{tb|replace this with your username|ts=~~~~~}} template to my talk page because I might not be watchlisting your talkpage if we don't interact regularly. I will do the same for you if you ask me to or if you have not recently commented on my talkpage in the discussion.
Note that it is
2:49 AM (+5 UTC), where I live.
- Chess, everyone!
Make a move...
View current game
| TopGun vs. World | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chessboard | Moves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TopGun to move... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_eating_speckled_racer_(Drymobius_margaritiferus)_Orange_Walk.jpg)
The roadside hawk (Rupornis magnirostris) is a relatively small bird of prey in the family Accipitridae. It is found from Mexico through Central America and in most of South America east of the Andes. With the possible exception of dense rainforests, the roadside hawk is well adapted to most ecosystems in its range. It is also an urban bird, and is possibly the most common species of hawk seen in various cities throughout its range. This roadside hawk of the subspecies R. m. griseocauda was photographed feeding on a speckled racer in Orange Walk District, Belize.Photograph credit: Charles J. Sharp
Archive – More featured pictures...
The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| "The Defender of the Wiki is awarded to those who have gone above and beyond to prevent Misplaced Pages from being used for fraudulent purposes."
For exposing and shutting down another sock farm of Darkness Shines. Faizan (talk) 19:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC) |
- Thanks! He had it coming. Cheers. --lTopGunl (talk) 19:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| You sir are awesome! You are being awarded this barnstar for detecting, countering and then nuking the socks who have been disrupting Misplaced Pages by pushing POVs. Thanks for keeping Misplaced Pages clean! —TripWire 20:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC) |
- Thanks, TripWire! Much appreciated. Best of luck with the recreation of your article without a sock hounding you this time. Please try to rewrite the text to avoid copyright issues; even in your userspace. --lTopGunl (talk) 20:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- We hope that TopGun sir will also expose sock puppets of nationalist POV users of "all" countries. Cheers. --Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 20:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I have been at it and an example would be that of User:Lagoo Saab from Islamabad, Pakistan. But I'll ofcourse consider your comment as banter, on a lighter note, rather than divisive. --lTopGunl (talk) 20:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- We hope that TopGun sir will also expose sock puppets of nationalist POV users of "all" countries. Cheers. --Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 20:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of Murder, She Wrote episodes
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Murder, She Wrote episodes. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Jimi Hendrix
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jimi Hendrix. Legobot (talk) 00:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Tyson Fury
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tyson Fury. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
--Tag Teaming (talk) 04:15, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note I have removed this section from ANI due to it being posted through the inappropriate use of an alternate account. Whoever "Tag Teaming" is can use their regular account to make such posts. Chillum 04:27, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Topic-banned
I just noticed this edit of yours. If you seriously thought the version you were reinstating was better than the other, I can only conclude you utterly lack the competence to act responsibly as a Misplaced Pages editor in a POV-sensitive topic area. Consequently, I am topic-banning you from all edits related to Indian-Pakistani conflicts and Pakistani politics for a period of 6 months. I assume you know the procedure about logging and appeals of such DS measures. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- Huh?!?! Future Perfect at Sunrise, I made a revert keeping the word "Invaded" out to an obvious SPA in a sock infested topic area who I noticed on a talk page (I was/am dealing with a ton of socks here - reverting an SPA with even a slight POV is well within reason even if you are not giving me any leeway in regards to the socks). I did not care about the version that was previously there as well. How come that lone edit is worth a topic ban? This fact is corroborated by my complete silence at this. I didn't care for enforcing the standing version either. Even if this was something I had personally added to the article, this was mostly the case on Kashmir dispute (Muslim majority and a Hindu ruler). It is not any thing more than an uncited version I reverted to (but not POV-pushing on my part). It was only preferable to the word invaded and I saw that the next edit was infact taking both perspectives out of the equation which was fine. Unless you were looking to dish out something to all editors involved in the RFC with something to stop the disruption that was actually being caused by socks, there's no reason for you to go so far as a topic ban for this edit even if you truly consider this nonconstructive. You, as an admin, have no authority over content (not that I would have disputed if you had reverted me as an editor - as seen in the removal in next edit - so you don't have any justification for the sanction in that regard too).
- You need to rethink over this keeping above in view and the fact that you completely lacked to assume good faith; even if you chose not to, you did not even ask me for an explanation of my revert which is quite unfair and misjudged. I'll be happy to take this to WP:AE/WP:AN if you are not willing to reconsider the topic ban on a revert to an SPA but I'll prefer to resolve this directly if you understand that I was not the one causing disruption here (I hardly edit that article anyway - feel free to take a look), and this was not remotely "gross lack of competence" as you thought it to be. --lTopGunl (talk) 18:11, 3 July 2015 (UTC)