This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ryulong (talk | contribs) at 05:35, 3 October 2014 (Reverted 1 edit by Loganmac (talk) to last revision by Ryulong. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:35, 3 October 2014 by Ryulong (talk | contribs) (Reverted 1 edit by Loganmac (talk) to last revision by Ryulong. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page by using either the "new section" tab or this link. |
Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). If you do not sign your comments, I may remove them entirely. |
Please keep your comments short and to the point. I do not want to read essays on this page. |
I will revert and ignore any basic template messages used on my talk page. If you want to talk to me, use your own words. |
I prefer to keep conversations on one page. If I left a message for you on your user talk page, I prefer to respond to you there. |
My local time: January 2025 19 Sunday 11:51 am EST |
Archives
|
---|
|
When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives at my own discretion.—Ryūlóng
Sorry
I really didn't mean to remove your comment on Talk:Zoe Quinn, what happened was I rollbacked, and while the rollback went through hit 'edit' with my middle click button to open in a new tab, thinking that rollback was -that- quick to post a dummy edit apologizing. Again, really sorry and I didn't mean to aggravate or remove your comment. Tutelary (talk) 21:32, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- No worries then.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:33, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Some bubble tea for you!
I would really like to personally thank you for always being on the lookout for users that want to make an issue about Hong Kong. Don't give up! Staglit (talk) 20:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
It's hard to edit the same section, even at different paragraphs - both my edits conflicted with yours (the first one had me disoriented for a few seconds, as I was trying to insert Quinn as well in that paragraph). Thanks for restoring the last one! Diego (talk) 17:29, 16 September 2014 (UTC) |
GamerGate edit 17:54
Hey Ryulong, just noticed https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=GamerGate&diff=625840756&oldid=625840394. While I understand your reasoning - due to the misandrogy allegations by gaming media and mass-media, isn't it slightly relevant? I realize this is a bit of a grey zone though. Cheers. MicBenSte (talk) 18:21, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- Her gender is important to the whole debate but not to where we have to label her as female when we can just use gendered pronouns.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:57, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks
Might be wrong of me, but I got a belly laugh out of your edit summary. :) Dreadstar ☥ 18:52, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Edit conflicts are annoying and humorous.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:53, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
The Fine Young Capitalists
I semi-protected but there may still be some BLP in there. See Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#The Fine Young Capitalists. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:08, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- Fair enough.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 16:40, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- Re your edit here, there's this. Dreadstar ☥ 23:00, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- I thought this was the other guy when I saw the orange bar.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- <sigh>, I'm always being mistaken for another. Usually this guy - don't know how they make that connection.... :) Dreadstar ☥ 23:04, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- Well usually when I get an orange bar someone's mad at me for reverting them.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:05, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- <sigh>, I'm always being mistaken for another. Usually this guy - don't know how they make that connection.... :) Dreadstar ☥ 23:04, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- I thought this was the other guy when I saw the orange bar.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- Re your edit here, there's this. Dreadstar ☥ 23:00, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Civility
Please be WP:CIVIL. This is unacceptable behavior; insulting people is not okay. Titanium Dragon (talk) 04:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
- Are you sure that's the right link?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 04:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Just to note that you are being a bit strong in your counter replies, though not past any ANI-interference line. Yes, it is a touchy subject, yes there are those outside WP that are trying to affect it in ways policy can't, but you can still keep the article in policy compliance with a bit more decorum. You don't need to heat up the discussion more than it already is. --MASEM (t) 01:46, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- It has been weeks of outside influence at this point, though.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 04:27, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- In related news, I received an email from Jimbo which contained three swears.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 04:49, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
Kakuritsu
格率 (part of Parasyte anime title) doesn't mean probability;
Raamin (talk) 12:45, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- Somehow that came up in my original translation work.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 15:34, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Controversial edits at Gamergate controversy
Ryu, I'm issuing reminders to all involved about the revert warring at Gamergate controversy that started up again almost as soon as I unprotected the article. I don't want to pursue blocks (or to restore full-protection either). I have asked Diego to revert himself in the spirit of WP:BURDEN; please continue working together on the talk page.--Cúchullain /c 14:46, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- K.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 16:35, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Reverts
You're getting awfully close to 3RR on the GamerGate article. Be cautious in that. Tutelary (talk) 22:34, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Part of it was an edit conflict though.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- You've now passed it by removing the vivian image 4 times, and this is not an execptional case of 3RR involving NFCC. --MASEM (t) 23:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- It does fail NFCC though.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 05:31, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- You've now passed it by removing the vivian image 4 times, and this is not an execptional case of 3RR involving NFCC. --MASEM (t) 23:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)