Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by John Carter (talk | contribs) at 14:38, 5 June 2014 (→June 2014: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Heicth, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi there Heicth! I have replied to your comment here: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Kjangdom_deleting_academic_sources_and_inserting_self-published_Shugden_websites All the best, Jangdom Kjangdom (talk) 10:12, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Heicth, How are you? Thought you might be interested to know that I edited this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:14th_Dalai_Lama#Dorje_Shugden_Controversy All the best, Jangdom

Hi Heicth! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

I regret to say that, based on your recent conduct, you appear to have little if any familiarity with or understanding of our basic policies and guidelines. Among the pages I would very sincerely urge you to familarize yourself with are WP:TPG and WP:CIVILITY, specifically regarding your rather dismissive attitude and frankly inexcusable conduct toward individuals whom you have declared to be a single purpose account as per WP:SPA. I also urge you to read that page, because, honestly, according to the basic definition of the term SPA around here, based on your edit history, you are as much, if not more, of a single-purpose account than others.

I also think it would very much be in your best interests to review our various guidelines regarding article content and structure, particularly regarding matters of amount of material devoted to a particular area of the topic as per WP:WEIGHT. Our main articles on most organizations, formally organized or otherwise, are primarily intended for individuals not already familiar with the topic, and they are supposed to present information on the group as a group first and foremost, then give information on what others think of them. In fact, although we prefer strictly academic sources, we are first and foremost obliged to present a comprehensive overview first, whether that material can be sourced from strictly academic sources or not. And that takes priority over presenting material from specific individual academics.

I also note that you have received a few comments inviting you to take part in the Misplaced Pages:Teahouse. I very sincerely urge you to take advantage of that opportunity. The main purpose of that group or location is to assist newer editors, like yourself, in understanding how to conduct themselves around here, both in terms of their individual actions and in terms of the conduct they seek to edit. So far as I can tell, from your edit history, you have yet to do so. You very clearly still seem to be operating on some major misconceptions regarding what any individual editors are really allowed to do regarding the input of others, and the experienced editors who respond to comments from invited guests as yourself there will almost certainly be able to give you a lot of help regarding some of your existing concerns. John Carter (talk) 14:38, 5 June 2014 (UTC)