Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Klocek - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tgeorgescu (talk | contribs) at 19:31, 28 May 2014 (→28 May 2014: quote from User:Kww). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:31, 28 May 2014 by Tgeorgescu (talk | contribs) (→28 May 2014: quote from User:Kww)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

DVMt

DVMt (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/DVMt/Archive.

This case was moved to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/DVMt from Klocek (talk · contribs). Future cases should be placed there.



28 May 2014

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets


DVMt has been recently blocked for persistent sockpuppetry, and has edited Acupuncture and Talk:Acupuncture as Klocek just before being blocked. Suddenly after DVMt got blocked, at Acupuncture another dormant account is revived after about five years of dormancy and shows up editing the article. At Onediscdrive self-identifies as a licensed acupuncturist, and DVMt self-identified as scientist and acupuncturist on his own user page. I have a strong suspicion that they are the same person. At User_talk:Klocek the same argument about an account being revived after eight years of inactivity was made. Tgeorgescu (talk) 18:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm the one that upgraded the block. I may have misidentified the sock master, but there's no way that this is anything but a sleeper account. 10 edits in a burst the day of account creation, an eight-year gap, and then leaping in to restore the edits of another account that I blocked doesn't lead to any other conclusions.—

— Kww(talk) 13:48, 28 May 2014 (UTC), User talk:Klocek
Quoted by Tgeorgescu (talk) 19:31, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Klocek Add topic