This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Largoplazo (talk | contribs) at 12:34, 14 April 2014 (→Worldwide wave of action). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:34, 14 April 2014 by Largoplazo (talk | contribs) (→Worldwide wave of action)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Skip to table of contents |
OWS (defunct) | ||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject OWS and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 15 days |
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Occupy Melbourne is exerting personal pressure on me over a wikipedia edit
This is regarding Occupy Melbourne. http://occupymelbourne.net/2013/02/20/editgate-cyberwar-continuesthe-same-occupy-melbourne-wikipedia-page-edits-redone-but-now-from-biomathematics-and-statistics-scotland/
I believe that I have simply adhere to WP:OR and WP:Verifiability. I have stated that they can undergo usual wikipedia abitration procedures if they disagree. Instead they are posting my personal details online and issuing an ultimatum.
Can someone look into this situation please.--Fangz (talk) 00:48, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
- I will look into this.--Amadscientist (talk) 01:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Continental Congress 2.0
The Continental Congress 2.0 article, which I created per a request on the project's to-do list, has been been proposed for deletion by User:Thargor Orlando. benzband (talk) 22:41, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- It has now been nominated for deletion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Continental Congress 2.0. benzband (talk) 22:07, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Worldwide wave of action
Any thoughts on Worldwide wave of action#RfC: One week in, virtually nothing? Did the Worldwide Wave of Action happen and, if not (as seems to be the case), was this ever a genuine article? Should it be revised or deleted? —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:34, 14 April 2014 (UTC)