This is an old revision of this page, as edited by A13ean (talk | contribs) at 19:40, 11 March 2013 (→PARSIFAL: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:40, 11 March 2013 by A13ean (talk | contribs) (→PARSIFAL: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)--/Archive --/Archive2 --/Archive3 --/Archive4 --/Archive Waldorf project
Controversial reversions at Waldorf
At the Waldorf schools article, you made two reversions regarding material that is controversial; material that is disputed on the talk page. You must self-revert or face sanctions because of the ArbCom final decision in 2006. Please revert:
- this removal of disputed text from the lead section, and
- This removal of the "Pseudoscience" category.
Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 03:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- There are active discussions about both these topics on the article talk page. We need to find consensus among the editors there.
- I don't know if you remember that there was a recent review of the original arbitration proceeding; I think you contributed to this. You might want to have a look at this again. hgilbert (talk) 11:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- I filed a request for clarification at Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Continued_conflict_of_interest_at_Waldorf_education. Feel free to take part in the discussion there. Binksternet (talk) 15:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
PARSIFAL
Hi H, I opened Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/PARSIFAL after not getting any response on WP:N a while back. Also it appears I managed to lose the source file for the chart, but will recreate it with the new data points when I have a chance. Cheers, a13ean (talk) 19:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC)