This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Coffeepusher (talk | contribs) at 18:11, 9 February 2013 (Statement regarding incident, reasons I agree with the edit itself). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:11, 9 February 2013 by Coffeepusher (talk | contribs) (Statement regarding incident, reasons I agree with the edit itself)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Volunteer Ministers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Scientology B‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
FDNY commendation
While the Church points to a commendation by the New York Fire Department for their relief efforts following the September 11, 2001 attacks
At the opening of the New York Ideal Org (2004), a Stephan Hittman awarded Scientology's Volunteer Ministers the "FDNY and 911 Medal of Valor". It turned out that (a) he had no authority to hand out medals, (b) the FDNY Medal of Valor, since 1960, has only been awarded posthumously and exclusively for line of duty death. So I think that it would be prudent see some detailed references for this, including who handed out this commendation. AndroidCat (talk) 21:52, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Wow. Cirt (talk) 10:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Mumbai cardinal asked to ban Scientologists from scene of terrorist attacks
- Thompson, Damian (November 28, 2008). "Scientologists move in on traumatised Mumbai". Holy Smoke. The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 2008-12-03.
- Thompson, Damian (November 29, 2008). "Mumbai cardinal asked to ban Scientologists from scene of terrorist attacks". Holy Smoke. The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 2008-12-03.
Sources to use in article. Cirt (talk) 04:44, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Legal threats by Drg55 against wikipedia
I have notified Drg55 on their talk page about wikipedia's no legal threat policy regarding this edit summary. I am assuming good faith in that Drg55 was probably unaware of this policy, so I am not reporting it to the administrators noticeboard unless Drg55 either continues this behavior or makes it known that they do intend legal action against wikipedia.
That being said, I agree with the deletion of the content but for different reasons. The quotes that Drg55 deleted were not from a reliable source so they shouldn't be used on this page (in my opinion).Coffeepusher (talk) 18:11, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Categories: