Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
Hello, Vibhijain, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Joaquin00810:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping!
We're halfway through round 3 (or the quarter finals, if you prefer) and things are running smoothly. We're seeing very high scoring; as of the time of writing, the top 16 all have over 90 points. This has already proved to be more competative than this time last year- in 2011, 76 points secured a place, while in 2010, a massive 250 was the lowest qualifying score. People have also upped their game slightly from last round, which is to be expected as we approach the end of the competition. Leading Pool A is Cwmhiraeth (submissions), whose points have mostly come from a large number of did you knows on marine biology. Pool B's leader, Grapple X (submissions), is for the first time not our highest scorer at the time of newsletter publication, but his good articles on The X-Files and Millenium keep him in second place overall. Miyagawa (submissions) leads Pool C, our quietest pool, with content in a variety of areas on a variety of topics. Pool D is led by Casliber (submissions), our current overall leader. Nearly half of Casliber's points come from his triple-scored Western Jackdaw, which is now a featured article.
This round has seen an unusually high number of featured lists, with nearly one in five remaining participants claiming one, and one user, Muboshgu (submissions), claiming two. Miyagawa's featured list, 1936 Summer Olympics medal table, was even awarded double points. By comparison, good article reviews seem to be playing a smaller part, and featured topics portals remain two content-types still unutilised in this competition. Other than that, there isn't much to say! Things are coming along smoothly. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Tag and Assess 2012
Thank You
With the help of contributors like you, the Tag and Assess 2012 project has achieved the planned objectives. Close to 65,000 articles have been assessed and 19,000 articles have been added to the scope of the project. Please do watch out for the post tag and assess activities. Thanks a lot. Ssriram mt (talk) 01:09, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Bot!..wow!
Great!..so you now have a bot...just seeing my watchlist when I found this Vibhijainbot..awesome..all the best..దṨṫƦⓘ₭ϱ𝝨Ƌǥɭϱ08:10, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Hehe! Hope it will get the approval. If it will get it, it will work on interwiki links, and if it ran successfully for a month or so, I will try to perform more functions with it. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛08:12, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you, Vibhijain, for !voting at my successful RFA; I am humbled that you put your trust in me. I grant you this flower, which, if tended to properly, will grow to be the fruit of Misplaced Pages's labours. Look forward to more work with you at DYK. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:33, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Project Coordinators have been chosen for effective administration of the project. Dipankan001 has been chosen as the lead coordinator. Vibhijain and TheSpecialUser has been elected as the coordinator and the vice-coordinator respectively. Each placeholder is expected to distribute awards to those who have assisted in completing the task of the month. General administration of the project will be done by the lead coordinator. The coordinator will have a general watch over the project to make sure that it is not inactive, along with preparing the newsletter. The vice-coordinator will further invite those users, who have been regularly contributing to IPL related articles, to join the project. The term for each coordinator will be of 6 months.
Chennai Super Kings have been chosen as the collaboration of the month. Editors will try to get the article to FA or GA status. At the end on the month, contributing editors will be given the following awards:
The IPL barnstar - Will be given to all those who will help in getting the article to FA/GA status.
The golden wiki barnstar - Will be given to the editor with most number of edits on the article during the month of June.
The silver wiki barnstar - Will be given to the editor with the second most number of edits on the article during the month of June.
The bronze wiki barnstar - Will be given to the editor with the third most number of edits on the article during the month of June.
The citation barnstar - Will be given to the top 3 editors who will improve and add most number of refs.(The editors are requested to mention "ref+" or "refimprove" in their edit summary; in order to make reviewing easy)
The copyedit barnstar - Will be given to the top 3 editors who will make the most number of copyedits. This includes minor changes, such as neutralizing, grammar correction, etc.
The working editor's barnstar - Will be given to the top 3 editors who will dedicate most time in making new sections, fixing them (such as renaming, making sub-sections, etc.) or adding information which was not previously present in the article (recent announcements, facts, creating tables, etc.).
Members of the project can now add Template:User IPL Member to their userpage, which will indicate that they are an active member of WikiProject IPL. Also editor can award the IPL barnstar or the IPL barnstar of Merit to those users who are greatly involved in the project.
This newsletter have been sent to you because you are a member of WikiProject IPL. To discontinue receiving WikiProject IPL newsletters, please add your name here.
Hello, this is an automated message to inform you that your message delivery request (WikiProject Indian Premier League newsletter) was completed successfully (see contributions). Happy editing!
Participation: Out of 54 people who signed up this drive, 32 copy-edited at least one article. Last drive's superstar, Lfstevens, again stood out, topping the leader board in all three categories and copy-editing over 700 articles. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.
Progress report: We were once again successful in our primary goal—removing the oldest three months from the backlog—while removing 1166 articles from the queue, the second-most in our history. The total backlog currently sits at around 2600 articles, down from 8323 when we started out just over two years ago.
Coodinator election: The six-month term for our third tranche of Guild coordinators will be expiring at the end of June. We will be accepting nominations for the fourth tranche of coordinators, who will also serve a six-month term. Nominations will open starting on June 5. For complete information, please have a look at the election page. – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, and Stfg
EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 8 June 2012 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡16:40, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Caution
You've appeared on too many articles I edit recently and I suspect that either there's some off wiki canvassing or that you are following my edits, in either case I'll have to report you as I see a pattern. In case you are editing in good faith and that I'm not right, please be more careful so that your edits do not even appear to be hounding. --lTopGunl (talk) 17:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi TopGun ! Let me make one thing clear, i am noway following your edits. Some days before I noticed that someone added Template:Kashmir separatist movement in one of my watchlisted articles, i found it was POV I came to template for deletion. And through them I got to other articles related to Pakistan and state terrorism which had original research POV , unsourced and controversial . And another point, i am giving proper reasons for my opinion. Sorry if I am sounding harsh, but it is not my headache if you have watchlisted all of these articles. Please stop harassing me with incorrect and self concocted accusations, as you have done on Talk:Battle of Chawinda. I sincerely hope that this wont be repeated. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛08:08, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
How you got there is not the justification, the thing is you appeared on so many places simultaneously that it looked like hounding and I cautioned you civilly which you just labeled as harassment which is quite inflammatory. Not to mention you just turned up at two more articles I edit, one which I just created. I don't care how you get there... the end result is you are following and opposing me every where. --lTopGunl (talk) 15:47, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
You're wrong. You've to learn much about it... following another editor with any excuse other than copy vios is not ok. --lTopGunl (talk) 15:47, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Although I am not following you, you really need to read WP:HOUND. It says,"Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Misplaced Pages policy," Almost all the discussions I have commented on are cases of POV. I am not here to drive you out of here, I am just giving my opinions, and that too according the wiki-policies. Also see WP:DEPE, I have done no personal attacks on you and I have been civil. I don't like to be in useless conflicts, but if you will continue like this, I will be forced to go to an administrator. Hope this will not happen. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛16:28, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
So you agree that you are following me to the articles where you think my edits are POV? Just before this you were saying you got there from elsewhere. You're not the first person who's started following me and I have a pretty good idea of these pattern of responses. It is in both our interest that you back off. You can not arbitrarily label some one's edits as a violation of a policy and then use that to follow. Since you've declined to consider my caution I'll not waste your time here anymore. --lTopGunl (talk) 16:34, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
See my first line. This justification was to justify Strike Eagle's comment. I founded most of those articles through the TfD. If I have to tell you how I got to every article I have edited, I will need a time machine. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛16:36, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Making the Misplaced Pages Education Program Meeting better
Generally I offer beer to other users in this hot season but you are below 18 so I am offering you tea(consider it as Ice tea)...... Vyom25 (talk) 06:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
It is mine too. One more thing the names of Centurions in that list are written in bold letters I am not sure why? Do you have any idea? I am considering of removing it.--Vyom25 (talk) 06:49, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Could you include that in the article please? The article does need more sources as the आचार्य is perhaps famous for astrology as well.इति इतिUAनेति नेति Humour Thisthat2011 07:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
What are you, like 10? Or is it an old photo :o) So I worked out how you keep turning up on certain articles, you followed me :o) good shout on the deletion mom BTW, happy editing and see you around. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Haha| No idea why everybody is saying that I am following him, maybe I am getting a lot famous! ;P You have been doing some great work. And by the way, that pic is one year old. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛16:11, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm not bothered about people following me as my contributions are always reliably sourced :o) Am going to be blocked for about a month or so, keep up the good work. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:56, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
June 2012
Your recent editing history at Pakistan Zindabad shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
(talk page stalker) Well I don't see any actual edit warring or violation of the 3RR. What I see is that you don't feel good that Vibhijain is editing your pages, and you're on the cusp of owning your articles, which ultimately will lead to you being blocked, not Vibhi. Leave that, whatever he edits, let him edit. Why are you so tensed about it? Have some Coca-Cola and rest. Forget about it. Thanks, Dipankan07:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
@TopGun Consider this as my last warning, if you will continue making such baseless allegations, I will be forced to take this issue to an administrator. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛07:28, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
