This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Darkness Shines (talk | contribs) at 16:09, 20 May 2012 (→Unblock III: What a joke). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:09, 20 May 2012 by Darkness Shines (talk | contribs) (→Unblock III: What a joke)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is Darkness Shines's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 |
Archives | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
And another unblock
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
If someone calls me a racist bigot I believe I have the right to respond in kind. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:51, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Unfortunatly you believe wrong. Two wrongs don't make a right, and a tit-for-tat personal attack don't contribute to a collegial editing environment any more than the original one did. The Bushranger One ping only 20:54, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Any reason in particular Nangparbat is being allowed to comment on ANI? http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=492933504 Darkness Shines (talk) 14:31, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Unblock
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
May I be unblocked please. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:01, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Looking at this talk page, I see a user who has placed a 'retired' tag -indicating that you have chosen not to edit Misplaced Pages any longer. Which is fine, but a confusing contradiction with an unblock request. It's fine to retire, but as a retired user, you don't really need an active account. Looking at your two requests for unblock, you make it clear that you will, if you return to Misplaced Pages, continue to violate the civility rule, and you feel strongly that you have a right to be incivil. That's fine, of course, as a general principle, but as you know, it isn't consistent with the way that Misplaced Pages's rules require editors to interact. There's nothing on this talk page that gives me any justification for overturning a block. If you decide to make another unblock request, it'll help reviewing admins if you are more specific about the reasons for the block and the reason your account should be unblocked... and if you haven't retired from Misplaced Pages, but are simply unwillingly blocked, you should probably remove the 'retired' banner, because it's super-confusing. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:44, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock III
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Template removed, I was blocked for calling another editor a wanker. I did this due to him calling me a racist bigot. I had a few drinks and lost my temper when I saw what he had written, and said it again when he not only refused to retract his smear but continued with it. I am not a racist, and to be smeared as one is quite upsetting. I fully intend to ignore this editor in the future so I do not think this will happen again. Darkness Shines (talk) 11:54 am, Today (UTC−4)
Decline reason:
Sorry DS. You're going to have to sit this one out. You've used the "I was drunk" excuse once too often and you were warned about it.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
regentspark (comment) 16:03, 20 May 2012 (UTC)}}
- And would it have been said at all if I was not called a racist bigot? No it would not. And the guy who called me a racist bigot did not get blocked for his completely unwarranted attack. I at least was provoked. What a joke, I get smeared and then I get blocked for reacting. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:09, 20 May 2012 (UTC)