Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Khvalamde (talk | contribs) at 10:51, 18 March 2012 (fuck this, i'm now going to retire forever.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

And now you're blocked

For one of the stupidest things I've ever seen someone under an interaction ban do. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:21, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Unblock Request

Khvalamde (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I see I did the stupidest thing an editor can ever do under an interaction ban (according to Floquenbeam's reasoning) , and I feel terribly sorry for having done such a crazy act. Next time, I step out of it, and mind my own business. I would like to apoligise to Floquenbeam for gloating like that and to everyone else. This has been the first time I've been blocked and I'm not too upset about it. I see, I did something I shouldn't have done, and I'll remember not to react like that ever again. Offense is realized and I will never do something like that again. To floquenbeam, If I am now in one of your blackbooks and I've now irritated you to the point where you can't stand me, I'll stay away from you and I'll mind my own business. I agree such a thing between me and Dave has escalated as of 2012, but I feel that it is wrong for blocking me for 'personal attacks' because I haven't made any hurl of vulgarity of any kind, I only violated an interaction ban that's it. I see what I didn't wasn't clever. If this block proposal passes and if I'm unblocked, I promise not to do it again, and I will agree never to come near Dave1185's path ever again. I tried to do the right thing, but it didn't as we are all on the learning curve.

Decline reason:

I see deliberate flaunting of the interaction ban by both parties, and I think you both need to be forced to stay away from each other for a while by sitting out your blocks, with the understanding that any recurrence will lead to an escalation -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:17, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Note from blocking admin, about to go offline: The diff in question is this, posted on a page of someone they're under an interaction ban with, and currently feuding with. Also, my longstanding policy is that my blocks can be overturned without consulting me first, if that's for the best in the judgement of any other admin, and that's true here too. But FWIW, my own opinion is both editors need to sit out their blocks, regardless of any claim they've learned from them. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
• One more note: see Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Another issue to deal with again. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
• One more note to Strange Passerby, there's something called WP:BUTTOUT. Mind your own business and could you just stop stalking my edits and just leave me alone? I don't know why you are so bent on wishing the worst for me. Similarly, I am fully competent, and if you think I'm not competent, then maybe just leave. It's editors such as yourself with the accusations and stalking of me that just don't want to make me feel welcome here anymore. Abhijay 01:45, 18 March 2012 (UTC)