User talk:CrustyPores - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CrustyPores (talk | contribs) at 15:11, 12 December 2011 (→Essentially, I think there's been a big misunderstanding). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:11, 12 December 2011 by CrustyPores (talk | contribs) (→Essentially, I think there's been a big misunderstanding)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

You may wish to stop vandalising articles. Thanks. Fifelfoo (talk) 09:09, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Do not refactor content signed over my signature; feel free to delete my comments rather than misrepresent me. Fifelfoo (talk) 09:54, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

This is me now

December 2011

You have been mentioned at ANI. Fifelfoo (talk) 11:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

TOLDUIWASHARDCORE 11:32, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Fifelfoo . Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:45, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

You're right. It was slap-bang out of order and I unreservedly apologise. I have a drinking problem. TOLDUIWASHARDCORE 11:48, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

MY AWARDS

Awards

For your help with the May 16, 2005 double redirect cleanup project you are given this award.
*(I never have figured out what exactly I was awarded... but it has knobs so it must be good, right? --tjstrf)*

For your contributions to Misplaced Pages and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Bryce (talk | contribs) 12:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Judge Priest. Sven Manguard Wha? 12:32, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

No worries chief, my controversial editing days are well and truly over. I don't understand why you posted this under "awards", but I understand your request and take it to heart, because after all isn't that what wikipedia is all about? Honesty?

Peace, friend. TOLDUIWASHARDCORE 12:35, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Essentially, I think there's been a big misunderstanding

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:37, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CrustyPores (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think I learned my lesson now. I think we can move for'ard in a spirit of togetherness. I think we should all just calm down and think before we do anything rash. Look at all these awards and trophies.

Decline reason:

after reviewing your edits, I have modified the block accordingly. Kuru (talk) 13:03, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CrustyPores (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thanks chief, I'm glad this matter has now been cleared up! :)

Decline reason:

Crusty let's face it, everybody here loves you and supports you. But the powers that be want you gone. You're a danger to the system, and for the protection of us all you must leave. I know none of us have the power to block you, but would you see your way to leaving of your own accord? This is the hardest thing I've ever had to do, the tears are streaming down my face, but like Jesus Christ I must ask that you sacrifice yourself for the good of the project. We shall always love you. We shall never forget you. Acroterion (talk) 14:41, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

I've given this a lot of thought Ascroterion, and I have decided to accept your gracious request. Do not weep for me my friend; I go now to a better place. I can also guarantee you that I will still be here in spirit, spreading the truth, kicking ass and taking names. Look for me wherever there is a troll that needs to be shanked or an article which needs to be fixed. I will be there, whispering on the wind. My children, my children; I love you all. Goodbye... goodbye.... goodbyeeee...........

TOLD U I WAS MOTHERFUCKING TITTYSUCKING HARDCORE 15:05, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

What does the above unblock request have to do with the issues for what you have been blocked for? Your account was only used for personal attacks and trolling. And there's no reason at all to unblock. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 14:08, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

But I have been unblocked. I can still edit pages. I'm sorry, I'm rather new to this whole business. I blocked a few people myself but they could still edit too. TOLDUIWASHARDCORE 14:12, 12 December 2011 (UTC)