Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zero0000 (talk | contribs) at 13:31, 16 July 2011 (→personal attacks: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

Archive 1 - Oct. 2006 through Feb. 2008 - Pco, PalestineRemembered complaints, Katrina analogy, User page AN/I's ... Archive 2 - Mar. 2008 through July 2008 - User page censorship Archive 3 - Jan. 2009 through Feb. 2009 Archive 4 - Mar. 2009 Archive 5 - Jun. 2009 through Aug. 2009 - Aliyah vs. Nakba, SlimVirgin's attitude ... Archive 6 - Sept. 2009 through Jun. 2010

Fair use rationale for File:KIBBUTZ SUFA ROCKET 04-16-08.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KIBBUTZ SUFA ROCKET 04-16-08.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 22:13, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Apparent 1RR violation at Hezbollah

Hello GHcool. A complaint about you has been filed at WP:AN3#User:GHcool reported by User:Supreme Deliciousness. The Hezbollah article is under a 1RR/day restriction due to WP:ARBPIA, which you can easily see at the top of Talk:Hezbollah. If you respond at the noticeboard and promise to stop warring on this article you may still be able to avoid sanctions. You should also promise not to edit the article for seven days. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:38, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Promising not to revert the article is not sufficient (per your comment at Talk:Hezbollah); you should promise not to edit the article at all for seven days. Please respond at WP:AN3, otherwise you may be sanctioned under the Arbcom case. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 06:33, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."

Per WP:AN3#User:GHcool reported by User:Supreme Deliciousness (Result: 24 hours). EdJohnston (talk) 14:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision. EdJohnston (talk) 15:06, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Usage of inappropriate language

Dear friend. You edit here is in contrast with WP:Civility. Misplaced Pages users are not speakman of their countries foreign minister. In matters like Hezbollah's one, there are controversial view points and Misplaced Pages reserves equal weight for all of them. Such comments don't have any place in Misplaced Pages. Try to respect, else you'll encounter further problems. Thanks.--Aliwiki (talk) 08:09, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

Hi GHcool, thanks for your kind words. Even if we may not always see eye to eye, I'm glad that we can work together constructively, and hopeful we can continue to do so in the future. Working under an umbrella of civility makes dealing with our differences of opinion much more manageable I think. Cheers. ← George 07:29, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Hezbollah. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 11:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello

Hello. You are mentioned here -- nsaum75  18:09, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."

Discretionary sanctions

In accordance with WP:ARBPIA#Dscretionary sanctions and the consensus of uninvolved administrators, I am hereby informing you that you are banned from editing any page or taking part in any discussion (regardless of namespace) related to the area of conflict covered by the case, broadly construed. This restriction is in place for 62 days from the expiry of your current block (0137, 26 March 2011, UTC) and, if necessary, will be enforced by escalating blocks.

You may appeal this sanction at any time to the relevant noticeboard, currently WP:AE, or directly to ArbCom. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:12, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

I choose not to appeal the decision at this time, though I reserve the right to change my mind. The dispute about whether or not Hezbollah is an Islamic terror organization was idiotic to begin with and I now realize that it was not worth the amount of trouble I got myself in. --GHcool (talk) 06:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Stirring It

Very easy to stir the shit from half a world away mate. For everyone's benefit, I wish you and your chums in the States would refrain from doing so... you can still send the money though!

Hello

You might wish to comment here in a matter that concerns you--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 19:15, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Topic ban lifted

I've lifted your topic ban and amended WP:ARBPIA to reflect this. In lieu of the remaining month on your topic ban consider this a caution to edit within the letter and the spirit of ARBPIA and all applicable policies and guidelines. Consider it a chance to prove that the topic ban was unnecessary. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Good call

... on the tag-bombing w/out rationale.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:42, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Rami R 14:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

You can disregard this message; the reported incident appears to have been caused by a software glitch that resulted in your being incorrectly identified. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 14:47, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

POV at jerusalem attack

for yuour own sake refrain from

That appears to be falsification of sources. I suggest you make yourself unambiguously useful in the I/P topic area or you'll find yourself topic banned for a very long time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:06, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

You'll notice I immediately changed the wording on the edit in question. --GHcool (talk) 04:07, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

1RR violation at History of the Arab–Israeli conflict

Please self-revert. Thank you. --Frederico1234 (talk) 16:53, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

You still need to self-revert. Please do so now. Thanks. --Frederico1234 (talk) 06:45, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

I don't know what you're referring to. --GHcool (talk) 15:45, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

This and this revert. --Frederico1234 (talk) 16:29, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

That was a week ago. We were discussing it on the talk page. You're welcome to join the discussion if you have some grievance or whatever. --GHcool (talk) 17:59, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

It was a 1RR-violation. You do need to self-revert. You should have self-reverted when you saw the first warning nearly a wee ago. Please do so now. --Frederico1234 (talk) 00:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

I tried to self-revert, but it didn't allow me to. I guess we're gonna have to discuss it and edit the article together like gentlemen. --GHcool (talk) 05:28, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Rules are rules. Reverting will be more difficult now, true. This would not be the case if you had not ignored the first warning. You still need to self-revert. --Frederico1234 (talk) 07:04, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

I don't know how at this point. How about this: I give you permission to revert my thing (if you can figure it out), and then I'll restore the stuff of value and then we can discuss the article like grown ups. Or, alternatively, we can act like grown ups now, let go of childish things, and let bygones be bygones. Your choice. --GHcool (talk) 16:48, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

I agree that reverting now would be too difficult. I also acknowledge that you were kind in checking that book from the library, so I won't take this to AE. But please self-revert when asked to do so in the future. --Frederico1234 (talk) 17:06, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Number of Judges

At Book of Judges, you've added from Bacon a line saying that the addition of 3 minor judges to the list of major judges brings the total to 12. But the numbers don't work out - not in the list in the article, anyway. I don't want to revert your good-faith (and referenced) edit, but could you go back to your source and see if you can fix this? PiCo (talk) 03:32, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry I'll fix it now. My error. --GHcool (talk) 03:34, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

personal attacks

"Apparently, the problem with Gold is that he is an Israeli." -- This is your only warning, next time I'm filing a report. Zero 13:31, 16 July 2011 (UTC)