Misplaced Pages

User talk:45g

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Balph Eubank (talk | contribs) at 15:41, 10 January 2011 (AfD nomination of Grace Saunders (author). using TW). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:41, 10 January 2011 by Balph Eubank (talk | contribs) (AfD nomination of Grace Saunders (author). using TW)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

May 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for vandalizing SPI pages. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. NW (Talk) 21:02, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Extended block

I have extended your block to "indefinite" per WP:NLT, based on this comment: . If you would like to sue someone, you need to contact Misplaced Pages's legal counsel, User:MGodwin, via normal legal channels. You are not allowed to edit Misplaced Pages under any form if you are using the threat of legal action to force other people to do what you want them to. --Jayron32 21:27, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Stop blanking this page while you are blocked. You will only lose access to this page if you continue to inappropriately use it. Please use this talkpage for requesting {{unblock}} only. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:39, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
There is nothing wrong with them blanking this page. Please see WP:BLANKING and stop restoring the content. --Onorem♠Dil 21:53, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Your both halfway right. The exception to that policy is removing block notices and declined unblock requests while blocks are still active, but it's hardly worth edit warring over. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:50, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

45g (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know if you people ever pay that much attention to what goes on, but I said I was gonna get a new name as two ignorant people got me banned for defending myself to false accusations. I get furious when my old accounts are subject to more abuse, though. But like I said, I was only banned because Snaisybelle started that tirade about my alts. I'm past caring, quite frankly.

Decline reason:

I don't see an unblock request in there anywhere, and there is no way you are going to be unblocked while there is a legal threat still standing anyway. See WP:NLT, WP:GAB, and WP:NOTTHEM. I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    • understand what you have been blocked for,
    • will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    • will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:47, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Legal threats in your edit summary (now removed) and personal attacks in your edit does not get you anywhere. Note that you are blocked with talk page access removed. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 18:14, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello 45g! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 22 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Thessaly Lerner - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:15, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Grace Saunders (author) for deletion

The article Grace Saunders (author) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Grace Saunders (author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 15:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

User talk:45g Add topic