Misplaced Pages

User talk:Accretionist

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Magog the Ogre (talk | contribs) at 00:37, 1 December 2010 (November 2010: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:37, 1 December 2010 by Magog the Ogre (talk | contribs) (November 2010: re)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

November 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for your account is clearly a sockpuppet, or at best a meatpuppet. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:18, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Magog, I noticed you restored the bias tag when there was clear consensus not to. And now you're questioning another editor (not me) for removing it, even going so far as to question whether "an email" is circulating. As far as I know, none is. No matter how many breathless/transparent ejaculations of "Magog the ANGEL!!!!!!" LGAE directs to you, he's still tendentiously editing in very bad faith.
In fact there is clear evidence of off-site canvassing by an involved editor: LGAE. More here. These diffs, provided by Will Beback, cast some doubt on the legitimacy of today's editor who restored the bias tag. Rather than questioning the motives of editors trying to keep the SPLC page honest and accurate, perhaps you should ask LGAE if he's returned to canvassing, perhaps via an email campaign of his own.
And now LGAE has personally attacked every editor taking an opposite view from his on the Talk page. He apparently wishes to use you as a "go-to admin," a hoary Wiki method otherwise known as "working the refs." Please be warned. --Accretionist (talk) 16:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

This is all irrelevant at the moment. The fact is the community has decided your behavior was flatly unacceptable, and you are no longer welcome to edit here (that is the reason I reverted the edit). If you wish to address this issue, mainly the blatant incivility (no matter how justified you think it was), please go back to your original account and request unblock there. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:37, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Accretionist Add topic