This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Unitanode (talk | contribs) at 16:54, 28 January 2010 (Reverted to revision 340462121 by Unitanode; no. early closures are supposed to be entirely uncontroversial. this is not.. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:54, 28 January 2010 by Unitanode (talk | contribs) (Reverted to revision 340462121 by Unitanode; no. early closures are supposed to be entirely uncontroversial. this is not.. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Joe Connelly (writer)
- Joe Connelly (writer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced BLP of a writer. WIkidemon is mass-reverting PROD tags from unsourced BLPs, without even bothering to try to source them. UnitAnode 00:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Writers are notable, especially when their books are notable and made into movies by notable directors. Grsz 02:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Clearly notable. I added some references. The nominator should review WP:BEFORE - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Sourcing verifies notability.--Cube lurker (talk) 18:35, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep I am not sure whether all of Wikidemon's deproddings are justified, but many of them are, such as this. Each time one of them is sourced, it proves that the prodding was unjustified is the prodding. It is time we settled the whole issue, by simply making WP:BEFORE a requirement, here and at WP:PROD. DGG ( talk ) 05:02, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Highly notable Vartanza (talk) 12:06, 27 January 2010 (UTC)