This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kww (talk | contribs) at 12:43, 8 April 2009 (→Amusing: your oppose). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:43, 8 April 2009 by Kww (talk | contribs) (→Amusing: your oppose)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)...
While this makes messages more fragmented, it also saves time. Please note many other users prefer to centralize discussions.
Shadow the Hedgehog (video game)
Hi, you said that you will comment at FACs if requested, and I think you are also a member of the WikiProject Video games. I have a favor to ask, can you look at the Shadow the Hedgehog FAC? It's been relatively inactive. Tezkag72 (talk) 14:42, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- Sure, send me whatever you have. I just want the article to pass; you're probably a better judge than me of what that takes for it. Tezkag72 (talk) 21:47, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Necrid images
Removed the secondary design image and marked it for speedy delete. As for the screenshot...only defense I have there is that it shows what exactly the weapons looks like better than the words really can. Will that suffice?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:25, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Signpost: 6 April 2009
- Special report: Interactive OpenStreetMap features in development
- News and notes: Statistics, Misplaced Pages research and more
- Misplaced Pages in the news: Wikia Search abandoned, university plagiarism, and more
- Dispatches: New FAC and FAR nomination process
- WikiProject report: WikiProject China
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:53, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
If I could just take a moment of your time...
Just wondering if you could give me a quick opinion on something. I've had User:S@bre/Sam & Max: Season One under development for a while, and its nearly done save for the reception section, referencing and a copyedit. I'm just a little lost as to how best to approach the reception section; should I approach it on an episode-by-episode basis (around 3-4 paragraphs), or a game-feature-by-feature approach (harder due to the overall lack of different aspects within an adventure game, probably 2-3 paragraphs), bearing in mind that the available reviews for the entire season generally aren't the usual sources. I'm just after a second opinion on the matter, then I can finally finish the article off and get on with other stuff. -- Sabre (talk) 22:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, ta. I'll see what I can make of that. Oh, I do so hate writing reception sections. They just don't come naturally. Development sections are much more smoother to write. -- Sabre (talk) 12:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
ST:FC
I am interested in helping, let me know what you're thinking of needing for that. --MASEM (t) 01:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
You know what Red could do with?
I revisited some old articles, and it struck me that no one had thought that Raptor Red could do with some free images...
There is Commons:Category:Utahraptor for some free images of a Utahraptor; however, most of them would need some more information (from where did they base their drawings on). File:Utahraptor 3.JPG, taken by Ballista, can be used without concern (I tidied it up); Dinoguy2 might rail about its accuracy, but it is a verifiably free image (and you can explicitly state it in the caption as a "reconstruction by the Oxford University Museum of Natural History"). File:Utahraptor ostrommaysi skeleton.JPG might be okay, but a bones lack the impact for a fiction.
As for Bakker, I found this on Flickr. The photographer has copyrighted it, but since he licensed this one under CC-by-2.0-sa, perhaps he can be persuaded to release the clear image of Bakker under the same license as well. Jappalang (talk) 13:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
What's with the Rollback?
??? Dabomb87 (talk) 00:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- I assume it was one of those pesky rollback links that all too often have a mind of their own. :) –Juliancolton | 00:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure it was a mistake too, no harm done ;) Dabomb87 (talk) 00:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Apparently I subconsciously had it in for Julian or Dabomb, don't remember that at all :P Thanks, --Der Wohltempierte Fuchs 01:10, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- At least it wasn't Twinkle's vandalism link, like this. — TKD::{talk} 02:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Amusing
I nearly voted Oppose: bears a grudge myself at KWW's rfa, but figured the irony might escape a few onlookers...and thought aaah what the heck, lotsa folks are gonna watch him. Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Your oppose
I don't follow up on most of the opposes, but I am on yours, because it surprised me. I felt like I did a good job of staying civil and representing my points logically during those discussions. Can you expand a little bit here so that I understand your issue better?—Kww(talk) 12:43, 8 April 2009 (UTC)