This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Random user 39849958 (talk | contribs) at 05:20, 22 October 2008 (Reverted to revision 246875713 by Levine2112; I'll get back to later. using TW). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:20, 22 October 2008 by Random user 39849958 (talk | contribs) (Reverted to revision 246875713 by Levine2112; I'll get back to later. using TW)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Archives |
|---|
Starting fresh
Time to archive. -- Levine2112 02:11, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Archiving tip
Hiya, if you'd like, I could set up a bot to auto-archive your page on a regular schedule. Also, you may wish to think about renaming your archives to something more standard. It's not required, but it could help in the future. Like right now they're named "archive0" "archive1" "archive2", but the more standard naming is "Archive 0" "Archive 1" "Archive 2", etc. One advantage to this, is you could then use an automatic archive box: {{archives|auto=yes}}, which will automatically sense the archives and make a list accordingly. Which, again, doesn't meant that you have to change anything! It's your talkpage, so you can archive or not as you choose, and can name archives anything you want. :) Or, if you're interested in my suggestions but it sounds like too much work, let me know and I'll take care of it for you. :) --Elonka 13:36, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'd prefer to archive on my own. I appreciate the suggestion though. -- Levine2112 19:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Bates method RfCs
Seeyou (talk · contribs) has contacted several random users, who as far as I can tell have no previous connection to the Bates method article, regarding three unofficial RfC's on the talk page. S/he appears to be asking them to rate the arguments offered on a scale of 0 to 10. What do you think of this tactic? It seems questionable to me, but it may be legitimate practice. Also, your opinion would be helpful in the latest RfC, which concerns how the AAO review should be used in the article. PSWG1920 (talk) 02:48, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- I am going to think about this for awhile. -- Levine2112 19:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Edit summary
Hi, Levine. Re the edit summary of this edit: I find it hard to understand what it's about, but it seems to me it could easily be construed as a remark about another editor. I suggest being especially careful what you put in edit summaries since they can't easily be edited or deleted. Regards, ☺ Coppertwig (talk) 02:26, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's from The Merchant of Venice. One of my favorite courtroom dramas ever. ;-) -- Levine2112 02:30, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- "The quality of mercy is not strained ..." ☺ Coppertwig (talk)
CEB
Hello Levine2112: I am interested in creating a department on Misplaced Pages titled "Code Enforcement Bureau (CEB)". it will be a department of established users who specialize in handing out citations, i.e. they will be recent changes patrollers. Although it may not be liked, the goal of the CEB is to alert users that what they did/edited was wrong, so to save the user much emotional pain when it is deleted. What is your opinion? --Archeopteryx (talk) 19:41, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- Let me think about this. I'll get back to you. -- Levine2112 02:33, 22 October 2008 (UTC)