This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Termer (talk | contribs) at 21:01, 5 January 2008 (→Breach of WP:CIV). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:01, 5 January 2008 by Termer (talk | contribs) (→Breach of WP:CIV)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| This is Termer's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)
The December 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Breach of WP:CIV
Earlier today you called me "bigoted". I am not happy with that remark, and I would like you to withdraw it. Regards, Gatoclass (talk) 15:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Gatoclass, I have never called you "bigoted" and I'm sorry you feel that you're not happy. however in case you're like to withdraw your bigoted statements ThuranX was referring to, Id be happy to withdraw my agreement with him and withdraw my posting accordingly. thanks for your understanding.--Termer (talk) 21:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- "And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?" Gatoclass, your request proves you demand respect from editors whom you've demonstrated you don't respect equally. This is not acceptable. I've informed you on your talk page of my Digwuren arbitration ruling inquiry.
- If you believe my assessment is incorrect, please feel free to modify your tactics. Remember the old Chinese proverb of you are who you appear to be. As I've also indicated, I'm not intending to continue to debate your motives or reasons for your stereotypes. You might consider working on articles and consensus where you don't enter with preconceived notions of an adversarial relationship. —PētersV (talk) 19:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- P.S. Your allegation quotes Termer out of context and does not reflect his full statement, which does not breach WP:CIV, especially considering your complete refusal to admit any responsibility for your low opinion of editors of Eastern European heritage.
- Phrases and attitude such as:
- You owe an apology
- For what? Stating the patently obvious? I don't think so.
- carry with them more than a mere tinge of bigotry. It's an ugly word indeed. Consider that your denigrating self-righteous attitude of superiority might be an issue. You likely have a completely different and more positive perception of your mores and behavior--consider also that your perception of your behavior is apparently not that of others. —PētersV (talk) 19:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)