Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gameking69 (talk | contribs) at 00:33, 18 January 2025 (draft). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Ammia of Philadelphia (fl. late 1st – early 2nd century AD), also known as Ammia the Prophetess, was an early Christian prophetess known for her influential role within the Christian community of Philadelphia, in the Roman province of Asia (Alaşehir, Turkey). She was one of the few women in the early church to be formally recognized with the title of prophetess and is noted for her contributions to the prophetic tradition during the formative years of Christianity.

Acknowledged by the church historian Eusebius, Ammia was listed among a distinguished group of prophets. Her prophetic practice adhered to orthodox Christian traditions, and she is regarded as a successor to the apostolic prophetic ministry, playing a role in building and sustaining the foundations of the early Christianity.

Despite being lesser-known today, scholars highlight her significance in antiquity.

Ministry

Ammia was a prophetess who was well-recognized in antiquity and referred to as "Ammia in Philadelphia." by Church historian Eusebius (4th century CE) in Church History listed her as part of a distinguished group of prophets active within the Christian church during the late 1st or early 2nd century CE or . These group of prophets included Agabus, Judas Barsabbas, Silas, the daughters of Philip, and Quadratus, many of whom are referenced in the Book of Acts. Therefore, she was regarded as a successor to the prophetic tradition established by these figures.

Philip’s daughters (prophetesses from the New Testament) were active in the 60s CE and Ammia was "succeeded in fame" by them.

She was active in the church from the late 1st or early 2nd century CE, contributing to the prophetic tradition during the formative years of Christianity in Asia Minor, and flourished in the first half of the 2nd century CE, when her influence as a prophetess became widely recognized.

On dating of Ammia’s ministry, Christine Trevett stated: "If Quadratus flourished in the decade of the 120s and was succeeded by Ammia, the start of the activity of the Three could certainly have been in the 160s if not earlier."

Ammia was acknowledged within the orthodox Christian tradition, which emphasized adherence to mainstream Christian beliefs. Additionally, this was relayed by Eusebius, whom he identifies her as one who “prophesied under the New Convent". This recognition sets her apart from contemporaries like Priscilla and Maximilla, who were associated with Montanism, a movement later deemed heretical. Despite this distinction, the Montanists attempted to claim Ammia and Quadratus as predecessors in the prophetic gift. They sought to connect their movement to the established tradition of prophecy within the early church.

Ammia’s prophetic practice was noted for its measured and composed approach. This contrasted sharply with the ecstatic and frenzied style of Montanist prophets, which Eusebius criticized as deviating from established traditions.

As recognized successors to the apostolic prophetic ministry, Ammia and Quadratus played a vital role in building and sustaining the foundations of the early Christian church in Asia Minor.

Legacy

Late Antiquity account

Eusebius references Ammia in Ecclesiastical History, (Chapter XVII.—Miltiades and His Works), as part of a lineage of distinguished prophets in early Christianity.

Eusebius quotes Miltiades, a contemporary critic of Montanus, who writes:

"They cannot show that one of the old or one of the new prophets was thus carried away in spirit. Neither can they boast of Agabus, or Judas, or Silas, or the daughters of Philip, or Ammia in Philadelphia, or Quadratus, or any others not belonging to them." "For if after Quadratus and Ammia in Philadelphia, as they assert, the women with Montanus received the prophetic gift, let them show who among them received it from Montanus and the women. For the apostle thought it necessary that the prophetic gift should continue in all the Church until the final coming. But they cannot show it, though this is the fourteenth year since the death of Maximilla."

Scholarship

Kirkland stated "It is significant that every time the name Ammia occurs she is identified as a local prophetess, from Philadelphia, the first significant town after Hierapolis on the route from the interior to the coast at Smyrna. Given this local pride...".

Ammia of Philadelphia remains an enigmatic figure in early Christian history. According to Dr. Lyn M. Kidson, she was "unknown now but well known enough by ancient audiences," highlighting her significance in antiquity despite the lack of detailed information about her life. Mitchell Locklear similarly notes that "little is known" about her, emphasizing the scarcity of historical records.

Anne Jensen compares Ammia and Anonyma of Caesarea, noting that Anonyma is the last documented female prophetess in the extant sources and the only one in the mainstream church about whom more is known than Ammia.

See also

• Women in Church history
• Prophets in Christianity
• Montanism
• Philadelphia (Asia Minor)
• Book of Acts
• Book of Revelation (Philadelphia is mentioned)

References

1. ^ Kidson, L. M. (2018, May 28). Ammia in Philadelphia. Engendered Ideas. https://engenderedideas.wordpress.com/2018/05/28/ammia-in-philadelphia/
2. ^ Trevett, C. (1996). Montanism: Gender, authority and the new prophecy (pp. 34-35). Cambridge University Press. https://archive.org/details/montanismgendera0000trev/page/34/mode/2up?q=Ammia
3. ^ Kirkland, A. (1995). "The Beginnings of Christianity in the Lycus Valley: An Exercise in Historical Reconstruction". Neotestamentica 29(1): 109–111.
4. Kirby, P. (2025). Historical Jesus theories. Early Christian Writings. Retrieved January 17, 2025, from https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/antimontanist.html
5. Jensen, A. (1996). God's self-confident daughters: Early Christianity and the liberation of women (p. 19). Westminster John Knox Press.
6. Eusebius of Caesarea. (1926). Church History, 5.17.2–4. In K. Lake & J. E. L. Oulton (Trans.), The Ecclesiastical History (Vol. 1, pp. xxiii–xxiv). London: W. Heinemann; New York: G.P. Putnam's Press. Retrieved from https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.x.xviii.html
7. Shogren, G., & ESEPA, S. (2014). The gift of tongues in the post-apostolic church: A rejoinder to Cleon Rogers. In Strangers to fire (pp. 399–410). https://openoureyeslord.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/shogren_the-gift-of-tongues-in-the-post-apostolic-church.pdf
8. Locklear, M. (2013). Word, spirit, and power: Women and prophetic authority in the early church. Bridges: A Journal of Student Research, 7(7), Article 5. https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/bridges/vol7/iss7/5
9. Jensen, A. (1996). God's self-confident daughters: Early Christianity and the liberation of women (p. 182). Westminster John Knox Press.

Notes

Cite error: There are <ref group=note> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=note}} template (see the help page).