Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SPECIFICO (talk | contribs) at 19:07, 24 June 2022 (→Oath Keepers: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives (index)

Index 1, 2

Old page Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

I tend to not look at my Talk page for long spans at a time. If you need to get a hold of me you can also email me if you need to discuss something or notify me.

Your GA nomination of Minnesota State Capitol

The article Minnesota State Capitol you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Minnesota State Capitol for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Asilvering -- Asilvering (talk) 00:20, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Minnesota State Capitol construction

The article Minnesota State Capitol construction you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Minnesota State Capitol construction for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mark83 -- Mark83 (talk) 01:41, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Minnesota State Capitol

The article Minnesota State Capitol you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Minnesota State Capitol for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Asilvering -- Asilvering (talk) 02:21, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Minnesota State Capitol artwork

The article Minnesota State Capitol artwork you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Minnesota State Capitol artwork for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Oncamera -- Oncamera (talk) 02:21, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Minnesota State Capitol artwork

On 8 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Minnesota State Capitol artwork, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the golden rooftop charioteer (pictured) was removed during the restoration of the Minnesota State Capitol and its artwork? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Minnesota State Capitol artwork. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Minnesota State Capitol artwork), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

• Congratulations on the GA and DYK, Myotus! Very fine work. Kablammo (talk) 12:40, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Wiki-Americans call tonight

I've sent you an email with details about a joint call between regional/state wiki user groups across the US tonight, if you'd like to join and help rep Minnesota. Pharos (talk) 18:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 07:27, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stewart Rhodes-mug shot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stewart Rhodes-mug shot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Oath Keepers

You are within your rights to post a request for additional editors to look at the Oath Keepers question, however it is not up to you to summarize the arguments which will be evident on the article talk page. It is also not helpful to repeat that Conservatism group post on the already long article page, where editors have spoken for themselves. Please consider removing that box thing. SPECIFICO talk 19:07, 24 June 2022 (UTC)