This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Captainbarrett (talk | contribs) at 17:33, 13 February 2007 (→[]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:33, 13 February 2007 by Captainbarrett (talk | contribs) (→[])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Ebony Anpu
- The initial AfD with the original nominator's comments concerning veracity of the sources and notability may be seen at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ebony Anpu, first try.
Okay folks, revisiting this AfD I have decided to reset it. Bare with me here. There were procedural concerns with the initial drafting of this AfD, namely that an Anon initiated it. However, the anon and or anons that started it have valid points, but such points have been lost by the fact that there has been use of proxies, and actual discussion about the merits of the article has been lost amongst folks disagreeing with the legitimacy of the AfD. So I am restarting the AfD, period. I have no opinion on the article, but here are the issues addressed by the anons, and I feel that they are valid reasons to initiate an AfD...
- The individual is non-notable. See this Google Search, for instance.
- There are serious concerns with the veracity of the references used in the article.
With that out of the way, the discussion in this AfD will remain limited to the whether or not the article's claims meet our standards set up for proper references, and whether or not the subject of the article meets our criteria for inclusion. Procedural brouhaha shall remain on the talk page of the AfD only. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 16:26, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 16:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- No Vote For the record. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 16:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep See (Old AfD). Captain Barrett 16:51, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- No vote from me either for right now, but I think Jeffrey did the right thing by refreshing this discussion. Should this page be protected too, to prevent more of the same antics? (jarbarf) 17:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- _Sigh_ yeah, it would probably be a good idea. Good Looking out. Captain Barrett 17:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Notablility
- 'Notable here means "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice". It is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance". It is not measured by Misplaced Pages editors' own subjective judgements. Notability is generally permanent.'-Misplaced Pages. Already Ebony has attracted a lot of Notice in the week he has been on Wiki. Everything against him has been character assasination with no validity. The proof of his notability is found in all AfD records. I mean, seriously, how could someone who is _not notable_ cause so much interest and concern in the first week? Captain Barrett 17:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC)