User talk:Ftutocdg - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 05:29, 3 March 2014 (Signing comment by Mufaddalqn - ""). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 05:29, 3 March 2014 by SineBot (talk | contribs) (Signing comment by Mufaddalqn - "")(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mufaddalqn (talk • contribs) 05:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Ftutocdg, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 15:07, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Qutbi Bohra

I have declined your speedy deletion nominations, as have two other administrators before me. Speedy deletion is only carried out for the restricted list of reasons at WP:CSD, and none of the reasons you have given are applicable. If you think this article should be deleted, you should nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 15:07, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Accidental removal of hidden comment

Hi, just a heads-up, when you made this edit, you removed the following hidden comment from the page: . You should have added your entry underneath that comment. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:56, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Changing your own comments on Talk pages

I'm trying to clean up the Qutbi Bohra Talk page. It's a real mess of overwritten, unsigned, and changed edits by various users. When I'm done please take a look at it and verify that I have not inadvertantly changed anything you contributed. And please read WP:REDACT before modifying comments you have previously made to Talk pages. It's very confusing when you insert comments into the middle of something you have previously posted. Meters (talk) 21:55, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

I see you were actually inserting your comments into someone else's posting. Don't do that. It becomes impossible for anyone to follow the discussion or even to figure out which user added which comments. Meters (talk) 22:15, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

I've finished cleaning up the Talk page. Please check that i have not made any mistakes. Meters (talk) 02:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

File a dispute against Qutbi Bohra article

Qutbi Bohra article is clearly a pre planned strategy to seperate the camp of khuzaima from dawoodi bohra and give them another name. Khuzaima has not yet claimed formation of seperate sect . Only his rivals want him to form a separate sect.

Hence please file a dispute to delete the article as that article has been written under the coordination of Jamea Saifiya as a pre planned strategy to alienate khuzaima from dawoodi bohra and deprive him of all the assets. Dispute filing link:

=overtagging

You're overtagging. For example, the tag fiction is for articles about books, etc. which spend too much time on the plot. The infobox is not removed when the material is unsourced--if it is sourced in the test it is enough, if not a cite tag can be used for material you think wrong. References to possibly dubious sites should be removed only after discussion and consensus. When there are problems with sourcing or the whole article, there is no point tagging each section for it also. I think it is clear from you talk p. and AfD discussion that you have a clear personal conflict of interest here, and would do well not to make changes of this sort. Someone has already reverted your changes, but if not, I might have done so also. DGG ( talk ) 18:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

I see you reverted the other party;'s changes. I restored them, but added the tags I think appropriate. If you continue to remove them, you are likely to be blocked for edit warring. The issues have to be discussed, and you will need to get some neutral party to help. DGG ( talk ) 18:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

This is your only warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Mufaddal Saifuddin. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 19:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

WOW ! I've NEVER vandalised this article. Just done minor corrections. Overzealous? Ftutocdg (talk) 19:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

My apologies - it was a glitch in the program that I use to manage vandalism. I take full responsibility. Warning revoked and happy editing Ftutocdg. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 21:19, 27 February 2014 (UTC)