This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk | contribs) at 02:18, 16 January 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:18, 16 January 2011 by Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)I have a simple two to three step process for refactoring comments that seem to anyone to be uncivil:
- You need to provide a specific reference to specific wording. A diff or link is a good start, but you need to quote exactly what part of the wording is uncivil and why. Is it an adjective? A particular phrase? etc. (For example, "I thought it was uncivil when you said 'there are dozens of isochron methods' here.")
- You will need to be abundantly clear as to how the exact wording is perceived by you to be uncivil towards you personally and why you consider it to be uncivil. (For example, "When I was being persecuted in the Maltese riots of 1988, the favored phrase of the police as they shot us with their water cannons was 'There are dozens of isochron methods!' The phrase still haunts me to this day.")
- Provide an alternative wording that provides the same information without the perceived incivility. This is not a necessary step, but would be helpful. (For example, "Instead of saying that phrase, could you just say 'Scientists use a large number of radioisotope ratios to allow them to date rocks.'? This phrase does not carry the loaded baggage that I associate with the wording you wrote but seems to have the same meaning.")
- Once you provide at least information relating to the first two steps, I will usually immediately refactor. The third step is optional.
|
This user is block free - (see my block log here!). |
Vanguard Editor
and is entitled to display this
Unobtainium
Editor Star
with the
Neutronium Superstar hologram.
Back in one year
I will be leaving for one year. This will be enforced by a self-blocking mechanism through a wikibreak enforcer.
I am quite disappointed that it had to come to this, but since I know that my enemies will game any edit I make to be somehow related to "fringe science" especially considering my normal modes of activity it's not worth the hassle of editing under this absurd and vindictive arbcom enforcement.
When I come back on January 15, 2012, I will be sanction free and return to editing with impunity.
If I happen to see egregious errors in the meantime, I'll be fixing them through anonymous, untraceable, unblocked proxies. They will not be traceable to this account, but I encourage those who dislike me to scour the edit histories carefully to look for my calling card.
I ask my talkpage watchers to remove the gloating by my enemies.
Peace,
jps (talk) 01:43, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Unblock to add enforcer
ජපස (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I want to add the wikibreak enforcer to vector.js Alternatively, could I ask an admin either unblock me, or just add this to vector.js:Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I want to add the wikibreak enforcer to vector.js Alternatively, could I ask an admin either unblock me, or just add this to vector.js: |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I want to add the wikibreak enforcer to vector.js Alternatively, could I ask an admin either unblock me, or just add this to vector.js: |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I want to add the wikibreak enforcer to vector.js Alternatively, could I ask an admin either unblock me, or just add this to vector.js: |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
/*** BEGIN WIKIBREAK ENFORCER ***/
addOnloadHook(function() {
/*** Start editing here ***/
// When you want to end your break?
// no leading zeroes. (example: 7 - correct, 07 - incorrect)
var date = { year: 2012, month: 1, day: 16};
var time = { hours: 0, minutes: 0, seconds: 0 };
/*** Stop editing here ***/
var currentDate = new Date();
var enforcedBreakEnd = new Date(
date.year,date.month-1,date.day,time.hours,time.minutes,time.seconds);
if (currentDate <= enforcedBreakEnd) {
alert("Enforced wikibreak until "+enforcedBreakEnd.toLocaleString()
+ "\n(now is "+currentDate.toLocaleString()+")\n\nBye!");
location = "http://"+location.host+"/search/?title="
+ "Special:Userlogout&returnto=Main_Page";
}
});
/*** END WIKIBREAK ENFORCER ***/