This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Malik Shabazz (talk | contribs) at 20:15, 22 February 2010 (→Muhammad al-Durrah incident: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:15, 22 February 2010 by Malik Shabazz (talk | contribs) (→Muhammad al-Durrah incident: reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Gerald guterman
Hi there. Thanks for your edits to Gerald Guterman. I'm worried that every day a brand new, anonymous editor comes along to remove anything which discusses the magnate's struggles. If you can help keep an eye on this page, I'd be grateful. Thanks again, Smilo Don (talk) 02:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Al-Durrah
The article recently went through an extensive review and was given featured-article status. That sentence is one of the key perspectives of sections of the Israeli and Jewish communities, and it has been widely published as such. It's therefore in the lead for balance. By removing it, you are unbalancing the lead, because you are leaving the Palestinian perspective, but removing the other. If you want to argue against it, please go to the talk page and make your case. SlimVirgin 22:28, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
I don't agree with much of that, see the Talk page on the article. Thanks.Soledad22 (talk) 07:22, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Muhammad al-Durrah incident
Please stop edit-warring on Muhammad al-Durrah incident. Further reverts will result in your being blocked. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 19:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
I am editing and not edit-warring. Misplaced Pages works when the public edits it and improves it. That's what I am doing. Thanks!Soledad22 (talk) 20:09, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- When you repeatedly delete the same sentence, it's edit-warring. Thank you for joining the discussion on the article's Talk page. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 20:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)