This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bigweeboy (talk | contribs) at 16:57, 2 January 2010 (→Recent comments on John Hagelin page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:57, 2 January 2010 by Bigweeboy (talk | contribs) (→Recent comments on John Hagelin page)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome. Interesting that you have just appeared today, Kala and immediately began commenting on the TM article only. Where have you come from? Happy New Year. --BwB (talk) 16:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Welcome
Hello, Kala Bethere, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! TimidGuy (talk) 16:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Simple request: Note that the Misplaced Pages Guideline for Talk pages suggests not using upper case and bold in your comments. TimidGuy (talk) 16:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Good suggestions, Timid. Thanks. --BwB (talk) 16:30, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:28, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Recent comments on John Hagelin page
Kala, I assume you are new editor and as such may not be aware that one of Misplaced Pages's fundamental and founding principles is collaboration. Labelling editors as apologists, and journals as pseudoscience in fact any labeling at all can only create a less than positive environment, and is opinion. We all have our opinions here but we have to try and leave opinions that do not deal directly with the article off the talk page, not always easy to do , but the best for all editors involved. Just a thought or two.(olive (talk) 16:09, 2 January 2010 (UTC))
- To add: The John Hagelin article is a WP:BLP. BLP articles must stringently adhere to the use of very reliable sourced content, and even consensus cannot override WP:Policy.(olive (talk) 16:09, 2 January 2010 (UTC))
- I second Olive's first comment here. We are happy to welcome well informed editors to collaborate on the articles, but please try to keep your comments on the content of the article, not on the editors. Thanks. --BwB (talk) 16:57, 2 January 2010 (UTC)