This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JBsupreme (talk | contribs) at 05:59, 29 September 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:59, 29 September 2009 by JBsupreme (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)MyPaint
- MyPaint (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
We shouldn't have a consensus for deeming most FOSS as notable. No assertion of notability. ViperSnake151 Talk 00:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:51, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - I can't find any reliable sources which would support this program's inclusion. I also agree that being FOSS shouldn't be taken as automagically conferring notability. Crafty (talk) 01:16, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - notability not established. (Verges on Speedy Delete A7: no attempt to establish notability.) - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:58, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable, no attempt to reference it and claim notable. Miami33139 (talk) 05:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete as notability is not established here. Thank god we don't have a bunch of "WP:IAR" hand wavers this time around and can delete this cleanly. JBsupreme (talk) 05:59, 29 September 2009 (UTC)