This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Off2riorob (talk | contribs) at 20:12, 22 September 2009 (→Further disruption by User:Off2riorob: this user has been blocked before....). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:12, 22 September 2009 by Off2riorob (talk | contribs) (→Further disruption by User:Off2riorob: this user has been blocked before....)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Talk page archives - Archive index | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
If you want to send me a confidential message here is my gpg public key: User talk:Chillum/GPG Public Key
- Note: Sometimes people post uncivil comments on my page. If you don't wish to be exposed to them simply add this line to your monobook.css:
.uncivil {background-color:black;}
Criteria
The criteria used by RickBot is "Administrators who have not edited in at least 2 months." This seems to make it hard to figure out activity levels, since to find them for a point in time, you have to get all admins' edits and then figure out whose was at least 2 months before that date. MBisanz 16:56, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- I just happen to have a mysql database with a complete list of when every admin made every edit. It saves all sorts of time. Chillum 16:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Though it does not include all of the ex-admins... Do you know where I can get a complete list people who were once an admin? Chillum 17:00, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ah... the user rights log would be a place to start. Chillum 17:01, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Just don't forget the WP:CRATLOG. MBisanz 17:09, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- I will read it from the rights log with the api:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=logevents&letype=rights&leprop=details%7Ctitle%7Ctimestamp&lelimit=500
- Once I have a full list of names I will fill in the gaps in my db and work on a data aggregater. Chillum 17:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- The user rights log is inconsistent. I will scan every delete, protection, or block action and take all of those usernames. Admins who have never used their tools will not be included but that is fine. Chillum 18:37, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, this is a bit harder than I thought. It seems there is not consistent log of when people became or stopped being admins. I need to gather the info from 3 sources: Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrat log which has the early sysopings, the en.wikipedia user rights logs that shows +sysops from after then, and http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/api.php which will have -sysops as well as some rare +sysops. Once I build a full list of admins by scanning all admin actions every taken I can gather the needed info for each admin. Chillum 19:54, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- I decided it would make more sense to graph the level of admin actions. Here is the raw data for the number of each action taken each day: http://s3.amazonaws.com/Wikipedia/graph.tab ( for all types of actions combined: http://s3.amazonaws.com/Wikipedia/graph2.tab )
- I will try to graph this nicely sometime later, I think it will need a logarithmic scale as deletes are so much more common than other actions. Chillum 23:32, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
HBC namewatcher bot, feature request
Hey -- I've noticed a number of WP:UAA reports lately that are "homophones" that look far less concerning than the underlying rule. For instance, I had to add "security" to the whitelist because "curit" is a homophone for "cunt". I was thinking, one way to reduce this kind of thing would be for the bot to treat homophone rules as if they had WAIT_TILL_EDIT: so a username including "cunt" would get reported right away but a username with "curit" would only get reported if they edit. Mangojuice 17:08, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- The WAIT_TILL_EDIT flag should work with HOMOGLYPH. The blacklist could be edited for patterns that should wait until an edit. I don't think the options should be tied together by default. I admit I did not put much thought to my addition of the homoglyph flags to the blacklist items. The homoglyph table itself may need some culling. I really left the configuration open ended for the community to work out, so be bold in adjusting it. Chillum 19:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- For example I just removed the n=ri rules from the homoglyph table. Chillum 06:04, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
removal of comments
Hi. I really don't agree but I'm not going to revert. There's too much targeting of the messenger going on, methinks, and it is hardly a case of my being alone with a view. I've seen you about a bit but don't think we've interacted much; your page has not been on my watchlist, so I guess I've never commented here. Interesting graph above; saw the others, too.
Greetings from Bali — where we had an earthquake this morning. Sincerely, Jack Merridew 04:55, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I assume you are referring to the AfD talk page. Be be straight, I don't really have any opinion on the content of the message, I do think the venue was not appropriate though. Perhaps user talk page or one of the dispute resolution areas would be more appropriate. I hope the quake was not too damaging. Chillum 20:21, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Well, the core issues are about AfD and that page is for that area; however, other pages are more appropriate (and some have been tried). The quake seems to have killed no one; it was 60km offshore, south of Bali. A friend's TV did crash to the floor from a wall bracket. Volcanic archipelago really should redirect to Indonesia as we've about 40% of the world's volcanoes; see List of volcanoes in Indonesia. Sincerely, Jack Merridew 04:14, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Autoblocks
Hi Chillum, CoM says he is still autoblocked and therefore unable to defend himself on the Arbcom page, could you un auto him? Off2riorob (talk) 17:05, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- That user was blocked due to an arbcom sanction enforcement. Law was incorrect to unblock CoM and I have no intention of contributing to that mistake. It is not appropriate for an admin to reverse an arbcom based admin action before arbcom has had time to review the action. Chillum 17:08, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 17:37, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
Hello, HighInBC. You have new messages at MickMacNee's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Responded. Chillum 17:13, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Attacking again. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 17:16, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- As long as he's not threatening anyone, 'tis easier to ignore the usepage. Sure wouldn't want to see a fella get barred from his homepage. GoodDay (talk) 17:20, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Further disruption by User:Off2riorob
You had previously reduced a three-week block on Off2riorob (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log).
Your notice in the block log was: "User gave word not to edit war in the future, reducing block", citing this comment from Off2riorob: .
He has since then (recently) chosen to engage in edit-warring again. Examples:
Off2riorob has been blocked seven times in the past, six of those for disruptive editing, the most recent being the three-week block of 21 August 2009. Cirt (talk) 19:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- I have not broken the 3 revert rule and I was discussing the situation a lot, I was warned on my talkpage and did not edit the dispute after that, The discussion is over a catagory of half blind which I nominated for deletion and which is also under discussion as we speak. Off2riorob (talk) 19:59, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
As regards to my previous blocks this User Cirt can in no way be seen to not be involved in my block record.
Five times I have been named at ANI, everytime I have been brought there it has been opened by User Cirt. first ever report at ani, by cirt
second visit to ani opened by Cirt
number three opened by Cirt again
here is the fifth,again started by User Cirt . Off2riorob (talk) 20:12, 22 September 2009 (UTC)