This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jahiegel (talk | contribs) at 06:21, 31 August 2006 (honorific). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:21, 31 August 2006 by Jahiegel (talk | contribs) (honorific)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Biography Unassessed | |||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on July 27, 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Pre-nominal honorific
I understand that the recent discussion militated, in view of concerns as to courtesy, in favor of our not using the surname only formulation (i.e., Hawkins). I am concerned, though, that such discussion contravenes, as noted by others, not only our extant practice but such practice as codified in the MoS, viz., at Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style (biographies)#Subsequent uses of names (which provides, in pertinent part, that after the initial mention of any name, the person may be referred to by surname only and that first names or complete names should be used to disambiguate between siblings).
Of course, it is quite fine to suggest that we ignore the MoS (in view of concerns as to the perception outside the United States of the dropped honorific), but I'd think those who suggest that common practice ought to change might do best to raise the issue at, inter al., Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style, toward the production of a consistent format.
There are only two instances, I think, that would be affected by our returning the article to the MoS-preferred version, so this is a rather insignificant issue, but it's important, I think, that the issue be raised in order that those who raised valid concerns might express them on a meta-level. Joe 06:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Categories: