Misplaced Pages

User talk:Raintheone

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 94.2.117.205 (talk) at 11:28, 22 July 2013 (→How come Anemone Projectors can never do wrong?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 11:28, 22 July 2013 by 94.2.117.205 (talk) (→How come Anemone Projectors can never do wrong?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Please leave a new message.
Archiving icon
Archives

Archive 1, 2, 3, 4


H&A 2013 v2.0

Managed to cut Alex down a tad. I think he's about ready to split if you have the stuff. I'm all for Diana having her own article. She was probably the closest thing to a superbitch the show had post-Morag and pre-Angie. There's bound to be some choice stuff about her treating Chloe like something she stepped in when she was with either of her sons. Conquistador2k6 26 March 2013 21:13 (UTC)


What's with the Jane removal in the '90 list? Have you gained enough info to take her out of others? Conquistador2k6 2 April 2013 22:35 (UTC)

Hey. Yeah I have had the info for a while. But I seem to have misplaced it. Just doing it now though.Rain the 1 21:49, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

1999 is going better than I thought it would, There's considerably less of a brick wall than with some others. I did a mild patchjob with Peta a few weeks ago, so she's not destined for list fodder. Edward, Judith and Ken on the other hand are pretty much screwed unless you have any additional.

Sandboxes piling up, eh? Well, Dan's practically done, as is Annie and all James needs is some reception, really. That might lighten the load.

Conquistador2k6 00:12 12 April 2013 2(UTC)

No wonder the 1999 list is going well, all you've had to do is copy and paste entire sections from other articles into it without changing a damn thing. (That Edward kid sounds fascinating though). - JuneGloom Talk 21:20, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

It's the not the cakewalk 1989 or 1995 were. Most of the regulars from that period have their own articles anyhow (Nick, Mitch, Harry, Shauna, Peta). However Ken and Judith are my major wallbangers right now, but I still hold out a LOT more hope for them than Stephanie and Liam in '96. My prayers would be answered if there were SOME half-decent Phelan or Hruby interviews or development.

Edward, despite his brief stay was one of the more interesting teens of the late 90s, really surprised there isn't more on him out there. The Goth look was seriously WTF at the time but the guy playing him made it work. Guess the producer probably wanted someone a little less vanilla or cookie cutter. Conquistador2k6 00:48 15 April 2013(UTC)

I think what we have is sufficient. If 14 sources aren't, I'd hate to see what was INSUFFICIENT. Even though it is my sandbox, you did like 60% of the work. I think it should go out. You do have a picture of Michael P. The reception was the real missing piece of the puzzle but I'm letting you have the final say on this. Conquistador2k6 23:13 17 April 2013(UTC)

I'll get onto AP tomorrow about moving, in the same way he did with Lachie, move but keep the history minus. 'Night. Conquistador2k6 00:10 18 April 2013(UTC)

Since you seem to be back on team H&A these days and in a sandbox creating mood, will you be adding anything to Roman in there near future? Also, Would you mind if I helped out a bit with Hugo as he's essentially been left dormant for a while? I'm just in between projects and have kind of slowed down a bit and am sort of picking up the scraps in other places. 16:49 (UTC) 26 May 2013 Conquistador2k6

You can help with Hugo, it has never really been a project to be honest. The article was deleted and I requested the final version for future use. Not sure about Roman though, I would like to create the article - but the current cast have risen to the top of my to do.Rain the 1 16:37, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Well, I've been Tinkering with Annie today and I've gone about as far as I can with Miss-Goody-Two-Shoes (Leady stuff, v.little else). Hugo's giving me a minor headache, I'm unsure where to work the leftover sources. Roman's pretty much yours to do as you wish. I was also thinking about splitting Alex Bennett off at some point but unsure about everything being in place (leave that to you) and there might be one more source that takes Joanne out of the 1995 list.

As for the lists; 2007 has some promise after June's put Geoff's article on hold and suggested to me that I put him in the list, which. 1999 has slowed down as I cannot find anything worthwhile for Ken and Judith. Hyde, Henry, Felix and Peter are who are holding holding up 2004. And 1994, as mentioned just needs Beth/Pearen info. She's the missing piece of that jigsaw.

00:23 (UTC) 12 June 2013 Conquistador2k6

Hollyoaks Deaths

You removed both Mick & Nana Flo from the "deaths" on the Hollyoaks page, didn't they first appear in the main show before appearing on the Later series? For example Mick appeared to get Joel's mother back and Nana Flo meeting Cheryl to tell her about the illness. Would they be classed as main show characters, allowing their deaths to appear on the page? xX-Xiaoyu-Xx — Preceding unsigned comment added by XX-Xiaoyu-Xx (talk • contribs) 23:24, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Cane Ashby

Hello there! I'm sure you're busy with a bunch of other projects, but I wanted to ask you if, by any chance, you'd be interested in reviewing Cane Ashby for GA. It's been impossible to find a reviewer these past few months. No worries if you can't, but I just thought I'd ask. Thanks! Regards, Creativity97 18:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello. Well I a busy at the moment and any editing during week nights is more of a chore. So if it remains unreviewed - the best I can offer is is, that I will take a look at the weekend, if no one makes any plans irl that is.Rain the 1 00:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
That would be greatly appreciated! Thanks so much! Creativity97 02:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Tug O'Neale

Howdy- I reviewed your nomination of Tug O'Neale as a good article. Sorry it took so long (nearly 5 months) for someone to review. Unfortunately, I did not think the article currently met the good article criteria. I did not think a week would be enough time to get it up to par. You can find my review here. Thank you for your contributions. PrairieKid (talk) 19:37, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

To go over everything I marked as "imperfect" or not up to criteria (I did this here, as the original GA nom discussion is closed):
Prose: I give several examples where the wording is off and I either had to reread or consider what the text was, and a few examples of bad grammar. I felt that the article needed a very thorough edit, and possibly a rewrite to get its basic grammar up to par. But, a good article needs more than just good grammar. It needs to flow, be well-organized and connected, and simply be "very well-written." It would have been a pretty big stretch to think that could be finished in a week, but I likely would have asked, and given you the time to fix it if you wanted it. But- that wasn't all that was wrong.
Refs: The article cites IPC-Media, Black 2009 (that one for three refs in a row), Big!, and Inside Soap for over half of its sources, on top of the fact that there were only 31 sources. Most TV GAs have 45-60, varying sources.
Focus: I think the fact that Bancks (which could be greatly expanded by information in Tug O'Neale, *hint* *hint*) already has a wiki article makes it so you don't need quite as much about him. I'm on the fence about that and it wasn't a big part of my decision.
Images: Again, not a big deal, but I would have liked either a cast photo, or a screenshot that showed an entire scene. (It could have had a link to the episode...) It just would have made the article that much better.
You can still make those improvements, and renominate the article in the coming months, if you want. I'm sorry you didn't find my original critique to be very helpful and I hope this cleared it up a little. LMK if you have any other questions. PrairieKid (talk) 00:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
That all sounds fine. I just felt there weren't enough sources. Now, I know that TV Characters generally do not have as many sources as a normal article, so I just looked it up on some character GAs to clarify. It did not meet the ref requirement, nor the prose requirement. I am sorry. Good look with any future improvements and with getting this through to become a GA. PrairieKid (talk) 01:33, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Question about Suzanne Ashworth (HO)

Where was it stated that her maiden name was "Dick" instead of "Fletcher" and that Nikki Fletcher is her half-sister and not her full-sister? Arjoccolenty (talk)

When she returned pregnant she revealed it to Darren.Rain the 1 17:16, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Do you know the date of the episode? I would like to watch it myself. Arjoccolenty (talk) 18:51, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
The best bet is to watch the episodes after she Suzanne birth in Look Sharpe - I remember the scene between Suzanne and Darren in Nancy's flat. No idea which episode it was though.Rain the 1 19:52, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Raintheone. You have new messages at PrairieKid's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

PrairieKid (talk) 16:34, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

New Archieve

Yes Please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Supacalafrajalistic (talk • contribs) 18:08, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Steph Scully

I'm sorry for that Image I just wanted to try new things on wikipeidia... I understand u don't want me to do anything on wikipeidia soo give any punish,ent you want. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Supacalafrajalistic (talk • contribs) 17:14, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Natalie Buchanan.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Natalie Buchanan.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Oliver Valentine Article

Hello, I recieved your message about Oliver Valentine article; first of all I want to apoloize if I upset you over my edited on Ollie's wikipedia page. I have been a editor on wikipedia for just a year and I am still learning how wikipedia works. About Oliver's article, there as been some new delevopment and storyline of the character with fictional character Tara Lo in Holby City; I have found information and sources about Oliver and Tara's storyline, which can be edited on Ollie's page to inform people about the character latest and updated information. Ollie and Tara got married in Holby City, Series 15, episode 26 "Promises, Promises", before Tara's has life-threatening operation to reduce her brain tumour. I have list sources to the information of Ollie and Tara getting married in Hobly City, Series 15, Episode 26 "Promises, Promises":

I want to apoloize again about my edited on Oliver Valentine wikipedia page, I hope with the information and sources I have found about Ollie will make his article even more good with high standards for present and future, and thank you for reading my message. Hogwartsfanzone (10:34, 14 April 2013)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Hollyoaks characters (2013), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Sutton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:49, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

I fixed this for you. - JuneGloom Talk 21:20, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Miranda

Do NOT call me abusive again. I have done nothing wrong. Speak to me like that again and I will make a formal complaint. Got it? Smurfmeister (talk) 22:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

By going to my talk page and accusing me of making threats you are only making your case worse. Smurfmeister (talk) 23:04, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Time to stop

Raintheone, you need to avoid reverting Smurfmeister. You're going to get yourself into an edit war ruckus if you keep this up. I'd like to everyone walk away from this without being blocked but that's probably gonna take a bit of disengagement on all sides. Tiderolls 00:24, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello Tide Rolls. I do not mind leaving it to others to sort out now. You have tried to offer your well informed advice and it has not helped the situation. I rather dislike these scenarios as they distract and detract from actual editing. They are the not so fun parts that sometimes occur.Rain the 1 00:40, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps in future you will also think twice before accusing other users of being abusive and making threats. Smurfmeister (talk) 10:02, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

New discussion

Hi there! I've begun a discussion here about titles for soap opera supercouple articles. Your opinion would be gladly appreciated! If you get the chance, could you contribute to the discussion? Thank you! Regards, Creativity97 21:57, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Oaks

Will do. Rui78901 (talk) 01:33, 12 May 2013 (UTC).

H&A

Ah! Well, I wasn't planning to get as stuck into the 2013 page as I was the 2012 one (I was actually worried people would think I was being a bit too over-eager in the including pretty much everyone) but if you need some help, sure, I'll have a look at it at some point. Skteosk (talk) 04:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

I think there's probably a couple of characters from the last two weeks of 2012 that I didn't add, I kind of stopped once I got to Gary's debut. I've looked over the first few weeks of 2013 to see if there's anyone missing and I'll get stuck into the page when I've got a spare evening. Skteosk (talk) 18:58, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Spencer gray

I thought spencer went away to live with the valentines he didnt go into a home! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevie sarah louise (talk • contribs) 14:01, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Did they not just move him into another where they were moving too.Rain the 1 14:12, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

New photo

Can I put the new guy for brad willis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Supacalafrajalistic (talk • contribs) 21:37, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

i am close friend to person who plays Jasmine/Jason Costello and she told me that she is going back to Hollyoaks at the end of the year she wanted people to know thanks babe — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.102.20.157 (talk) 20:50, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Toadfish Rebecchi

Can you please put a new image of Toadfish Rebecchi he doesn't look current with this pic — Preceding unsigned comment added by Supacalafrajalistic (talk • contribs) 14:10, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Not sure that a new one is really needed. Should an opportunity arise when watching the show, and I think it is a better choice, then I will replace it.Rain the 1 20:18, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Hollyoaks characters (2013) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Steven Roberts
List of fictional supercouples (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bobby Simpson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Fixed them for you. Conquistador2k6 29 May 2013 23:33 (UTC) Thank you - big help.Rain the 1 20:32, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Tony/Mandy HO

Did Tony and Mandy have a second miscarriage after they went traveling together? Apparently people are saying that there was a miscarriage in 2009, but all I know is the miscarriage before Grace, Grace who died of SIDS and then baby Ella, who was fathered by a man named Mark. 173.69.33.20 (talk) 00:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

I really think this is not true. He just left her stranded and returned to Oaks - She moaned about that a lot, but never mentioned being pregnant etc..Rain the 1 20:16, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Sonny Kiriakis

Can you Please make Sonny Kiriakis page better so his can be as good as Will Horton Please. I just need you to review it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.123.182.8 (talk) 06:02, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

I would normally. But I think it is best to ask User:Nk3play2 as they appear to be working on a sandbox for this character already.Rain the 1 20:15, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
I'm working on it, but it might take a while, I've got a lot of other things going on.--Nk3play2 21:29, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

FAC Comments?

Hi Rain, It's been a while... I was just wondering, would you be whiling to leave any comments or opinions here? I'd really appreciate it :) thanks. Arre 11:47, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

I never noticed this message sorry. I am no good with articles of that height anyway - so I was not needed - as I would be no help.Rain the 1 23:30, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

VJ

I should have said something before you started, but VJ's article needs to be created/recreated at V.J. Patterson. It's a naming conventions thing I believe. - JuneGloom Talk 23:12, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

I think it is one word though? I know the idea came from Vinnie Jnr.Rain the 1 23:14, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Well credited anyway as one word, you know what I mean. Thank you for informing me.Rain the 1 23:22, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Okay, let's create the article at VJ. AJ Ahmed doesn't have the periods in it, so VJ will be following the same lead. Someone with a better knowledge of these things is bound to come along eventually and they might be able to help us out. - JuneGloom Talk 23:24, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Do you want me to add any storylines or are you waiting for more development/reception? Conquistador2k6 3 July 2013 22:57 (UTC)

Well I shall add some more information now. Then it will be easier to tell which storylines need less written about them in the storyline section.Rain the 1 22:25, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

OK, I'll leave it alone for now til you've got everything Development-wise out of the way. Conquistador2k6 6 July 2013 10:30 (UTC)

Wednesday Night Fever

I noticed that you created the article Wednesday Night Fever. Do you plan on expanding the one source article? This appears to happen often though - quite frequent actually. You get the credit of creating the article - while another editor feels obliged to save the article. They are the editors who spend their valuable editing time adding actual content.Rain the 1 00:03, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

This is a brand new program which has only aired for one week. I will add information as it becomes available and as the program develops. I'm not trying to get the "credit" for starting articles. I'm creating them because I have found a certain amount of information and I want to make it available to anyone looking for the information and the references. As more information is released or published, I expand the articles or I find that others are able to find it from other sources. Isn't Wikipeda supposed to be a collaboration? J Bar (talk) 01:25, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
I could not agree more that Misplaced Pages is a collaboration. But I view your contributions to the collaboration borderline disruptive. I am confused because you have been on Misplaced Pages for over seven years. It is one sentence stubs when more information is actually available. You also throw in bare references which are no help in cases of link rot. Surely you know how to format a standard citation after seven years. It cannot continue for another seven years so I will be contacting an admin to offer advice on improving your contributions. If that one source about Wednesday Night Fever is the only one available (which it is not) then you probably should not have created it seeings as it would not pass WP:GNG.Rain the 1 22:01, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
If more information is available, I do my best to include it. However, there are only so many hours in every day. How one earth is creating a new article with basic information, which other editors can then expand, be disruptive to anyone? Surely you must have better things to do than dobbing people in for not instantly creating articles to your standard. If editors keep trying to prevent other editors from making contributions like this, then wikipedia will be the poorer. J Bar (talk) 22:14, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
I do not want to prevent you from making contributions. I am suggesting that instead of making three stubs for another editor to clean up - why not concentrate on improving one article. Then that is one less editor will have to clean up and concentrate on another project. I think one quality article is better than three stubs with one sentence. It is not to my standard, it is a standard accepted by the general community. I suggested it was disruptive for this reason. It distracts other editors - like I came across Blair Venn yesterday which you created without any sources - I spent some time to add a couple of sources because it was an easy target for a PROD. It needs work, but atleast there are some sources proving notability. I obviously have better things to do than "dobbing" on editors, such as creating and improving articles. I am only trying to help to be honest because I think you are more than capable of creating some sound work on here with your Australian TV knowledge and interests.Rain the 1 23:23, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
That's exactly what I'm trying to do but you have to appreciate that some editors don't have as much time as you do, to devote to editing. Real life gets in the way. Half the time I'm fighting battles with other editors on wikipedia who want to revert or delete my contributions. It is extremely frustrating when all you want to do is provide information that is worthwhile. J Bar (talk) 01:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

How come Anemone Projectors can never do wrong?

Some users on here seem to treasure Anemone Projectors and treat him like a god. Why does he deserve this sort of praise? I mean, he hardly ever does anything except lurk around Misplaced Pages, and randomly pop up with a (sometimes rude and insulting) comment and go again. If I was in charge, I would block him. 94.2.117.205 (talk) 11:26, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

User talk:Raintheone Add topic