Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Darkness Shines (talk | contribs) at 19:40, 9 June 2013 (→Blocked for 2 weeks: Re Spartaz). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Murder of Travis Alexander

Hi. Are you sticking with this article? We need you there to help maintain appropriate balance, especially when I or other editors are not there watching over the article. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 20:56, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

How many more chances will user Geebee get? Now he removed an entire section labeling it Irrelevant. User has been warned and told to stop several times. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 06:53, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Very quick observation Mrt canvassing

Doesnt this fall into the category of canvassing other users? he has sent this exact message to at least two or more other editors trying to garner sympathy for his cause which is basically deleting the article! yours sincerely nang. 81.157.114.216 (talk) 19:40, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Anti-Muslim pogroms in India for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anti-Muslim pogroms in India is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Anti-Muslim pogroms in India until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:59, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Anti-Muslim pogroms in India, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:58, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Godhra train burning may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:01, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Warning

That new article of yours, Anti-Muslim pogroms in India, displays forms of blockworthy tendentious editing and source misrepresentation. If I see you editing like that again, I will ask for a topic ban for you via WP:AE. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:05, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

No sources were misrepresented, and it is not tendentious editing to create an article on a noteworthy subject. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:46, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

OrangesRyellow (talk) 11:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Bad days Ds? Eh? The same here, but no worries. The spring will be on the spot soon. Faizan 11:05, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Unblock

Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have had no more than two reverts on any article today, I added some tags and new content only. As can be seen, was my only revert to Godhra train burning, all other edits were the addition of maintainence tags and new content. And on 2002 Gujarat violence just two reverts All other edits were again the addition of new content and maintainence tags ] (]) 19:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have had no more than two reverts on any article today, I added some tags and new content only. As can be seen, was my only revert to Godhra train burning, all other edits were the addition of maintainence tags and new content. And on 2002 Gujarat violence just two reverts All other edits were again the addition of new content and maintainence tags ] (]) 19:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have had no more than two reverts on any article today, I added some tags and new content only. As can be seen, was my only revert to Godhra train burning, all other edits were the addition of maintainence tags and new content. And on 2002 Gujarat violence just two reverts All other edits were again the addition of new content and maintainence tags ] (]) 19:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Blocked for 2 weeks

You just got unblocked early and here we are with unreconstructed edit warring. I have blocked you for a period commensurate with your last block. Please play nice when you get back. Something tells me you are running out of chances. Spartaz 19:20, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

I did not violate 3RR, and am only at 2RR on any article, see my unblock request above. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Please can reviewing admin look at this as DS was edit warring simultaneously at two articles at the same time with the same figures. Good thing I didn't see it when I dished out this block or I would have made it a month. EW does not require 3 reverts for a block. You were blatently baiting MrT and editing without discussion. That's not acceptable. Spartaz 19:35, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

User:Spartaz Since when has an editor had to discuss what he is going to add to an article? And BTW, I did discuss the changes I was going to make in advance at the Godra article here Darkness Shines (talk) 19:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

WP India discussion invitation

Tito, I am blocked man. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

• Requests for unblock