Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Oojamaflipper (talk | contribs) at 00:39, 2 June 2013 (→We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

sorry for being abrupt, but this is most annoying. you only linked reviews that are overwhelmingly negative and none of which pointed out the lies, flaws and dangerous liable that the film is soaked in. i tried to add one VERY important review, by alexa obrien. you not only deleted my entries but did not retain the obrien article. write it in there yourself if you want. but dont make out like this entry is unbias.it is not. at all.

and you did include bias in your own editorial as well..it wasnt just the terrible, establishment-stroking reviews.

this film is a menace to investigative journalism, to whistleblowers and to WL, Assange & Manning. if you are not being paid to manipulate this entry, and are doing it off your own back, with no vested interest, then you really are terribly misinformed. but i dont think you're ignorant of the real problems with this film, or with the bias in your entry, i think you are well aware. which makes it worse. hence the abruptness. this isn't about a wikipedia entry, this is about truth, justice & integrity.

June 2013

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks was changed by Oojamaflipper (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87223 on 2013-06-01T10:13:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:13, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Warning

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Schmidt, 10:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC)