This is an old revision of this page, as edited by S Marshall (talk | contribs) at 23:22, 17 August 2012 (Remark). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:22, 17 August 2012 by S Marshall (talk | contribs) (Remark)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Muhammed Qasim
- Muhammed Qasim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
On a living Guantanamo prisoner using an opinion piece and primary source as reference and tagged for multiple issues since 2009. Fails WP:BLP1E, WP:NOTINHERITED, WP:BIO. There are no secondary sources to claim notability of the subject and the citations used are WP:PRIMARY sources (WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 84#Reliability of US military summary reports) DBigXray 14:00, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete, as an individual the subject does not appear to pass WP:BIO or WP:GNG.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 06:24, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable due to lack of "signficant coverage" in reliable sources per WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 10:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Another Guantanamo article which fails the notability guidelines. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ 13:40, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
- Redirect to Afghan detainees at Guantanamo Bay. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
- Please see Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2012 August 17 for the reason why this AfD has been re-opened.—S Marshall T/C 23:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- I am now growing seriously concerned about these nominations.
Geo Swan is one of Misplaced Pages's most active editors with many, many articles to his credit, and reading the DRV will show you that the repeated nominations of things he's written, all by the same user, are causing him to feel distressed and demoralised. For whatever reason, DBigXray is going through systematically destroying Geo Swan's entire corpus at a rapid rate. When I raised my concern about the effect this was having in the past, DBigXray strongly took offence at my words and made a number of quite virulent accusations against me.
It is accepted that not everything Geo Swan has ever written complies with Misplaced Pages norms, but in my opinion one editor should not be allowed to wipe out another editor's entire corpus. Please read Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Geo Swan for the history that underlies this.—S Marshall T/C 23:22, 17 August 2012 (UTC)