Talk:Dalai Lama: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 03:34, 8 January 2021 editMoneytrees (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators29,893 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:16, 9 January 2021 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs)Bots, Template editors2,308,500 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Dalai Lama/Archive 10) (botNext edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:
	}}		}}
	{{Auto archiving notice \|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III \|age=90 \|small=yes \|dounreplied=yes}}		{{Auto archiving notice \|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III \|age=90 \|small=yes \|dounreplied=yes}}

	== Dalai Lama title ==

	I am surprised that no one points out the term Dalai Lama was given by Altan Khan, the leader of Tumet Mongol to the third Dalai Lama Sonam Gyatso (Tib: bsod nams rgya mtsho) in 1578.<ref>{{Cite web\|url=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P999\|title=Buddhist Digital Resource Center\|website=www.tbrc.org\|access-date=2019-02-05}}</ref>

	::Please feel free to add it here if you feel it is appropriate, whoever you are (anonymous?), plus this is mentioned under the article on the Third Dalai Lama who was the one to receive it. Cheers, ] (]) 21:05, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

	{{reflist-talk}}


	It was there at one time. ] (]) 14:43, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

	:I think it was taken away once there was a massive edit from Chinese account that wanted to make the Dalai Lama title something made up and control by China, thus taken away mentions of other countries' involvement. --] (]) 20:28, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

	::That's not really an excuse to justify a serious omission of facts. What did the chinese write? Was it inacurrate? Regardless, the accurate info that shouldn't be left out, was that Dalai lamas only existed after Tibet was Colonised. There used to be tibetan kings prior. What changed was the mongols. They took over and created the dai lai lamas and got rid of the tibetan kings's total rule. The first dalai lama was ultimately politically powerless and served the mongols as its class superior. The very name, “dalai” is indeed of mongol origin. Not tibetan deprivation. They did not freely adopt the mongol word for the novelty of it, but the title itself was created by the mongols and not tibetans. That is not written clearly in the article anywhere.

	″The political or secular authority of the Dalai Lamas over Tibet was a mechanism of non-Tibetan origin, and the name Dalai is of Mongol, not Tibetan, derivation. Since the 18th century Chinese authorities assumed the right to supervise the choice of new Dalai and Panchen Lamas, and the Tibetans have had to turn to China for protection against foreign invasions."

	https://www.nytimes.com/1994/03/01/opinion/l-tibet-couldn-t-lose-what-it-never-had-332046.html
	] (]) 03:23, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

	== Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion ==		== Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion ==

Revision as of 00:16, 9 January 2021

Template:Vital article

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dalai Lama article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: