Revision as of 14:11, 21 July 2019 view sourceAbh9850 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users791 editsNo edit summaryTag: Visual edit: Switched← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:17, 21 July 2019 view source Abh9850 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users791 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
Thanks for correcting me on the minor thing, my bad. Regards ] (]) 14:11, 21 July 2019 (UTC) | Thanks for correcting me on the minor thing, my bad. Regards ] (]) 14:11, 21 July 2019 (UTC) | ||
I have posted on the talk page of the Brahmi script. Please share your thoughts mate ] (]) 14:17, 21 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
<br /> | <br /> |
Revision as of 14:17, 21 July 2019
Abecedarian
(ay-bee-see-DAYR-ee-uhn)
noun
- One who is learning the alphabet.
- One who teaches the alphabet.
- One who is a beginner in some field.
adjective
- Alphabetically arranged.
- Relating to the alphabet.
- Rudimentary
And what, say, would abecedarians think of Misplaced Pages ?!
Articles started
- R. C. Hazra
- Pratapaditya Pal
- Upachara
- Global Campaign for Education
- Pashupati seal
- Rani Sati (found at AFD)
- Vivekodayam
- Tunnelgatan
- Doddakallahalli, Tumkur
- 2009 Nobel Peace Prize
- Maryam Jameelah (found at AFD)
- W. Norman Brown
- Sadhana (weekly)
- Baba (honorific)
- A Vedic Word Concordance
- Dineshchandra Sircar
- CIA's family jewels
- The Jaguar Smile
- Shubha Raul
- List of Hindu scriptures
- Suzanne Labin
- Manjeera
- Prevention of Terrorism Act, India
- Hindu iconography
- Behind the Scenes (US TV series)
- Mina P. Shaughnessy
- Alice Stewart Trillin
- Uploaded Images
Bower
Hidden to prevent theft or fading | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Wikiphilosophy or: how I learned to stop worrying and love the trolls
- What we are building here ? Encylopedia of everything
- How we are building it ? With persistence
- Who's building it ? Uhh ...
But why should I contribute to an article? I'm no expert.
— Lore Sjöberg
That's fine. The Misplaced Pages philosophy can be summed up thusly: "Experts are scum." For some reason people who spend 40 years learning everything they can about, say, the Peloponnesian War -- and indeed, advancing the body of human knowledge -- get all pissy when their contributions are edited away by Randy in Boise who heard somewhere that sword-wielding skeletons were involved. And they get downright irate when asked politely to engage in discourse with Randy until the sword-skeleton theory can be incorporated into the article without passing judgment.
Doppelganger account(s)
Subpages
- Administratory
- Maleabroad - tracking socks of user (defunct)
- Sandbox (empty)
Justified Edits
My edits are entirely justified as there is absolutely zero consensus whether Brahmi has a semitic origin. It is blatantly intellectually dishonest to mark any Indic script as being descended from the Sinatic or Aramaic alphabet when it is an ongoing controversy and the controversy/dispute is mentioned in the articles. I will revert the edits.
Thanks for correcting me on the minor thing, my bad. Regards Abh9850 (talk) 14:11, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
I have posted on the talk page of the Brahmi script. Please share your thoughts mate Abh9850 (talk) 14:17, 21 July 2019 (UTC)