User talk:A Nobody: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 04:45, 7 November 2006 view sourceA Nobody (talk \| contribs)53,000 edits moved response to discussion where response was being made← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:38, 7 November 2006 view source BigHaz (talk \| contribs)Administrators17,265 edits AfD EtiquetteNext edit →
Line 38:		Line 38:

	Thank you, I appreciate the effort at a constructive compromise. I really think the whole thing was getting out of hand. You'll notice that after the initial comments from you and a few others, I began a discussion on the Village pump and did NOT merely repeat the same argument for every AfD topic I contrubuted to. It seems that I've had to spend too much time defending my talk page! Anyway, I didn't see why my talk page should be overburdened by a dead issue. So, with that, you're a good Wikipedian! Have a wonderful night! Sincerely, --] 04:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)		Thank you, I appreciate the effort at a constructive compromise. I really think the whole thing was getting out of hand. You'll notice that after the initial comments from you and a few others, I began a discussion on the Village pump and did NOT merely repeat the same argument for every AfD topic I contrubuted to. It seems that I've had to spend too much time defending my talk page! Anyway, I didn't see why my talk page should be overburdened by a dead issue. So, with that, you're a good Wikipedian! Have a wonderful night! Sincerely, --] 04:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

			== AfD Etiquette ==

			You appear to have tried to vote twice at , once while logged in and once while not. Please don't do this again, as it's not allowed. You may express your opinion and respond to comments, but casting multiple votes is against the rules. ] - ] 05:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:38, 7 November 2006

Welcome to my talk page! Please be sure to make all posts civil and constructive, as I'll revert anything I deem to be vandalism. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 00:29, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Past comments can be seen here.

Welcome!

Hello, A Nobody, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

For help on how one should assess whether an article ought to be on Misplaced Pages, please see WP:N, WP:POINT, and WP:NOT. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kavadi carrier 03:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome and have a pleasant week! :) --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 05:09, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

My constructive comments on AfD pages

I stand by my comments and votes. I only posted the "keeps" on ones that I thought should be kept. I cannot bring myself to vote negative, because I know someone must have spent time writing any given article. Moreover, I really do think some are being too quick to delete articles. If NOBODY sees merit in an article, well okay, but if even a couple of people find an article useful and intriguing, keeping it is less likely to do harm than not having it. Seriously, though, I am noticing a too quick to delete trend, which is unfortunate. In any case, let’s not beat a dead horse on this one. Telling someone something once is usually sufficient. Besides, all of the specific articles, I thought should be kept and not every single "keep" post of mine was identical as some erroneously alleged. Sure, many were, but there was some variation and after the first message on my talk page, I made any new "keep" messages more precise. Beating the same point to death after the message has been received is well . . . Have a pleasant week and best regards, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 00:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

For more on this topic and discussion, please go to http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28policy%29#Too_quick_to_delete.3F__Concerns_with_AfD_trends

Merci

Grand Roi,

Merci beaucoup pour votre comments concerné La Chatham Chorale. J'apprécie sincèrement votre appui, et Je crois aussi cela une chorale, c'est bon, particulièrement celui-là, ils ont rendu la musique classique accessible pour tout le monde de Cape Cod. Encore, merci! (Et je suis desole, mais mon francais n'est tres bon) Knowing Is Half The Battle 00:18, 7 November 2006 (UTC) (Savoir est demi de la batille)

De rien! (And I speak English, so English is always fine! Good luck keeping your article! :)) Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 00:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

A history link

Since some people seem to be obsessed with the idea of being able to peer into your messages I have added a link to a version of this page which contained them. Regards, Kavadi carrier 04:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Dear Kavadi carrier,

Thank you, I appreciate the effort at a constructive compromise. I really think the whole thing was getting out of hand. You'll notice that after the initial comments from you and a few others, I began a discussion on the Village pump and did NOT merely repeat the same argument for every AfD topic I contrubuted to. It seems that I've had to spend too much time defending my talk page! Anyway, I didn't see why my talk page should be overburdened by a dead issue. So, with that, you're a good Wikipedian! Have a wonderful night! Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 04:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

AfD Etiquette

You appear to have tried to vote twice at this AfD, once while logged in and once while not. Please don't do this again, as it's not allowed. You may express your opinion and respond to comments, but casting multiple votes is against the rules. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)