Talk:Zumwalt-class destroyer: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 06:13, 3 March 2018 editArch dude (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,198 edits →Proposed new first paragraph.← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:59, 3 March 2018 edit undoArch dude (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,198 edits →Proposed new first paragraph.Next edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:
	== Proposed new first paragraph. ==		== Proposed new first paragraph. ==

	I have been editing this article to bring it up to date, and I eventually got it tidied up somewhat. the new stuff included the cancellation of the LRLAP, but I feel that the consequences are fairly fundamental to the Zumwalt story and are still not clear. I ended up with this paragraph:		I have been editing this article to bring it up to date, and I eventually got it tidied up somewhat. the new stuff included the cancellation of the LRLAP, but I feel that the consequences are fairly fundamental to the Zumwalt story and are still not clear. I ended up with this paragraph which is in the article as of 2 March:

	:The '''''Zumwalt''-class destroyer'''<!--('''DDG-1000''')--> is a ] of ] ]s designed as multi-mission ]s with a focus on land attack. The class is multi-role and was designed for ], ] and ]. They were intended to take the place of ]s in filling the former congressional mandate for naval fire support<ref>Section 1011 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104-106; 110 Stat. 421)</ref> but the lack of any ammunition for their advanced guns make them incapable of it. The class emerged from the ] program as "DD(X)".		:The '''''Zumwalt''-class destroyer'''<!--('''DDG-1000''')--> is a ] of ] ]s designed as multi-mission ]s with a focus on land attack. The class is multi-role and was designed for ], ] and ]. They were intended to take the place of ]s in filling the former congressional mandate for naval fire support<ref>Section 1011 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104-106; 110 Stat. 421)</ref> but the lack of any ammunition for their advanced guns make them incapable of it. The class emerged from the ] program as "DD(X)".
Line 27:		Line 27:
	Now, I want to make the situation quite clear, but this is a big step, so I put it here first. Here is the proposed paragraph:		Now, I want to make the situation quite clear, but this is a big step, so I put it here first. Here is the proposed paragraph:

	:The '''''Zumwalt''-class destroyer''' is a ] of ] ]s designed as multi-mission ]s with a focus on land attack. Although the class is multi-role and was designed for secondary roles of ] and ], it was designed primarily for ]. The class was intended to take the place of ]s in filling a congressional mandate for naval fire support.<ref>Section 1011 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104-106; 110 Stat. 421)</ref> The ship is designed around its two ]s, their turrets and magazines, and their unique ] ammunition.<ref name=LaGrone>{{cite web		:The '''''Zumwalt''-class destroyer''' is a ] of ] ]s designed as multi-mission ]s with a focus on land attack. Although the class is multi-role and was designed for secondary roles of ] and ], it was designed primarily for ]. The class was intended to take the place of ]s in filling a congressional mandate for naval fire support.<ref>Section 1011 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104-106; 110 Stat. 421)</ref> The ship is designed around its two ]s, their turrets and magazines, and their unique ] ammunition.<ref name=LaGrone>{{cite web\|url=https://news.usni.org/2018/01/11/no-new-round-planned-zumwalt-destroyer-gun-system-navy-monitoring-industry\|title=No New Round Planned For Zumwalt Destroyer Gun System; Navy Monitoring Industry\|last= LaGrone\|first= Sam\|date=January 11, 2018\|website= USNI News\|publisher= U.S. Naval Institute\|access-date= 2018-03-02}}</ref> LRLAP procurement has been cancelled, rendering the guns unusable.<ref name=LaGrone/> The Navy is re-purposing the ships for surface warfare.<ref name=Eckstein>{{cite web\|url= https://news.usni.org/2017/12/04/navy-refocus-ddg-1000-surface-strike\|title= New Requirements for DDG-1000 Focus on Surface Strike\|last= Eckstein\|first= Megan\|date= December 4, 2017\|website= USNI News\|publisher= U.S. Naval Institute\|access-date= 2018-03-02}}</ref> The class emerged from the ] program as "DD(X)".
	\|url=https://news.usni.org/2018/01/11/no-new-round-planned-zumwalt-destroyer-gun-system-navy-monitoring-industry
	\|title=No New Round Planned For Zumwalt Destroyer Gun System; Navy Monitoring Industry
	\|last= LaGrone
	\|first= Sam
	\|date=January 11, 2018
	\|website= USNI News
	\|publisher= U.S. Naval Institute
	\|access-date= 2018-03-02
	}}</ref> LRLAP procurement has been cancelled, rendering the guns unusable.<ref name=LaGrone/> The Navy is re-purposing the ships for surface warfare.<ref name=Eckstein>{{cite web
	\|url= https://news.usni.org/2017/12/04/navy-refocus-ddg-1000-surface-strike
	\|title= New Requirements for DDG-1000 Focus on Surface Strike
	\|last= Eckstein
	\|first= Megan
	\|date= December 4, 2017
	\|website= USNI News
	\|publisher= U.S. Naval Institute
	\|access-date= 2018-03-02
	}}</ref> The class emerged from the ] program as "DD(X)".
	{{reflist talk}}		{{reflist talk}}

	Please let me know what you think. -] (]) 06:11, 3 March 2018 (UTC)		Please let me know what you think. -] (]) 06:11, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
			*OK, I put the proposed paragraph into the article, But still please discuss this here if you wish if there are any issues. -] (]) 15:59, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:59, 3 March 2018

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zumwalt-class destroyer article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States: Military history / Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Proposed new first paragraph.

I have been editing this article to bring it up to date, and I eventually got it tidied up somewhat. the new stuff included the cancellation of the LRLAP, but I feel that the consequences are fairly fundamental to the Zumwalt story and are still not clear. I ended up with this paragraph which is in the article as of 2 March:

The Zumwalt-class destroyer is a class of United States Navy guided missile destroyers designed as multi-mission stealth ships with a focus on land attack. The class is multi-role and was designed for surface warfare, anti-aircraft warfare and naval gunfire support. They were intended to take the place of battleships in filling the former congressional mandate for naval fire support but the lack of any ammunition for their advanced guns make them incapable of it. The class emerged from the DD-21 program as "DD(X)".

Now, I want to make the situation quite clear, but this is a big step, so I put it here first. Here is the proposed paragraph:

The Zumwalt-class destroyer is a class of United States Navy guided missile destroyers designed as multi-mission stealth ships with a focus on land attack. Although the class is multi-role and was designed for secondary roles of surface warfare and anti-aircraft warfare, it was designed primarily for naval gunfire support. The class was intended to take the place of battleships in filling a congressional mandate for naval fire support. The ship is designed around its two Advanced Gun Systems, their turrets and magazines, and their unique LRLAP ammunition. LRLAP procurement has been cancelled, rendering the guns unusable. The Navy is re-purposing the ships for surface warfare. The class emerged from the DD-21 program as "DD(X)".

References

Section 1011 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104-106; 110 Stat. 421)
Section 1011 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104-106; 110 Stat. 421)
^ LaGrone, Sam (January 11, 2018). "No New Round Planned For Zumwalt Destroyer Gun System; Navy Monitoring Industry". USNI News. U.S. Naval Institute. Retrieved 2018-03-02.
Eckstein, Megan (December 4, 2017). "New Requirements for DDG-1000 Focus on Surface Strike". USNI News. U.S. Naval Institute. Retrieved 2018-03-02.

Please let me know what you think. -Arch dude (talk) 06:11, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

OK, I put the proposed paragraph into the article, But still please discuss this here if you wish if there are any issues. -Arch dude (talk) 15:59, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Categories: