| Revision as of 04:32, 3 January 2016 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,308,064 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Jayaguru-Shishya/Archive 2) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:51, 8 January 2016 edit undoMystery Wolff (talk | contribs)384 edits →Request for your feedback, on an AE regarding ECIG Articles.: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
| : Thanks for your message, ]. I mistakenly thought that the RfC is about the pseudoscience label in general, a discussion we already had earlier and therefore didn't pay that much attention. I am in support of your revert, though. I'll try to look into the discussion closer if I have the time. :-) Cheers and happy year of 2016! ] (]) 22:09, 2 January 2016 (UTC) | : Thanks for your message, ]. I mistakenly thought that the RfC is about the pseudoscience label in general, a discussion we already had earlier and therefore didn't pay that much attention. I am in support of your revert, though. I'll try to look into the discussion closer if I have the time. :-) Cheers and happy year of 2016! ] (]) 22:09, 2 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == Request for your feedback, on an AE regarding ECIG Articles. == | |||
| Hello, you are a recent editor of Electronic Cigarettes, I am asking for your input to an Arbitration Enforcement Request AE. Found here. If you have time I would appreciate your input. The items in question are listed out 1-8. | |||
| Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Mystery_Wolff<br />Thank you ] (]) 03:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:51, 8 January 2016
 Past talking |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
List of online encyclopedias
Thank you for the suggested re-wording of the subheading. I hope it's okay with you that I went ahead with the re-edit based on your thoughts. (I know of a few more state encyclopedias to add, if they have Misplaced Pages entries!) :) Floridasand (talk) 19:38, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Floridasand! Looks fine to me now! :-) Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 23:01, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Mr.Shishya I have to advise you
Escuse me but I just want you to be aware that some of your edits might be hurtful to others. On Chicago's Misplaced Pages page, Chicago, Illinois, you deleted an entire paragraph made by me. Its okay if i don't have any sources (I don't need sources its the truth obviously). I just want you to be aware of how others feel about you removing content that they typed on their own time. Sincerely, SupremeRulerGFG — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.32.32.68 (talk) 15:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Greetings, 75.32.32.68! Actually, one of the WP:FIVEPILLARS of Misplaced Pages is Misplaced Pages:Verifiability. You may want to familiarize yourself with the policies. Even though the material you added would be completely true, we'd need to back it up by WP:RELIABLE, WP:THIRDPARTY sources. I am sorry if you feel that all your editorial work is being discarded, but that's the way Misplaced Pages works. I am sure you can reinsert the material, though, as soon as you have found some sources to back up your statements. Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 21:32, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Your edit has been reverted, beside me, by two other editors as well. Therefore, I'd suggest reading WP:TALKDONTREVERT and WP:EDITWAR as well. Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 21:34, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Jayaguru-Shishya!
Jayaguru-Shishya,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. LesVegas (talk) 15:43, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Ayurveda
I've reverted your edit given there's an open RfC on this qualification of the statement. Please consider joining the discussion. --Ronz (talk) 21:31, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message, Ronz. I mistakenly thought that the RfC is about the pseudoscience label in general, a discussion we already had earlier and therefore didn't pay that much attention. I am in support of your revert, though. I'll try to look into the discussion closer if I have the time. :-) Cheers and happy year of 2016! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 22:09, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Request for your feedback, on an AE regarding ECIG Articles.
Hello, you are a recent editor of Electronic Cigarettes, I am asking for your input to an Arbitration Enforcement Request AE. Found here. If you have time I would appreciate your input. The items in question are listed out 1-8.
Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Mystery_Wolff
Thank you Mystery Wolff (talk) 03:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)