Misplaced Pages

The Center Square: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:20, 3 December 2015 editChampaign Supernova (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,312 edits Updated Alexa numbers← Previous edit Revision as of 02:55, 3 December 2015 edit undoHughD (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,133 edits →Outside analysis: restore deleted highly relevant content from extremely high quality, neutral, independent, third-party reliable source as per neutrality pillarNext edit →
Line 28: Line 28:


== Outside analysis == == Outside analysis ==
The ] of the ] surveyed and analyzed nonprofit news organizations active on the state or national level in 2011 and again in 2013.<ref name=pew20110718>{{cite web |work=] |publisher=] |title=Assessing a New Landscape in Journalism |first1=Jesse |last1=Holcomb |first2=Tom |last2=Rosenstiel |first3=Amy |last3=Mitchell |first4=Kevin |last4=Caldwell |first5=Tricia |last5=Sartor |first6=Nancy |last6=Vogt |url=http://www.journalism.org/2011/07/18/non-profit-news/ |date=July 18, 2011 |accessdate=October 23, 2015}}</ref><ref name=pew20130610>{{cite web |date=June 10, 2013 |title=Nonprofit Journalism: A Growing but Fragile Part of the U.S. News System |first1=Amy |last1=Mitchell |first2=Mark |last2=Jurkowitz |first3=Jesse |last3=Holcomb |first4=Jodi |last4=Enda |first5=Monica |last5=Anderson |url=http://www.journalism.org/2013/06/10/nonprofit-journalism/ |accessdate=October 23, 2015 |work=] |publisher=]}}</ref> The studies found that the most consistently ideological of the news outlets were those that were organized in networks, specifically the conservative Watchdog network and the liberal ].<ref name=pew20110718/><ref name=nfj20110718/> The ] of the ] surveyed and analyzed nonprofit news organizations active on the state or national level in 2011 and again in 2013.<ref name=pew20110718>{{cite web |work=] |publisher=] |title=Assessing a New Landscape in Journalism |first1=Jesse |last1=Holcomb |first2=Tom |last2=Rosenstiel |first3=Amy |last3=Mitchell |first4=Kevin |last4=Caldwell |first5=Tricia |last5=Sartor |first6=Nancy |last6=Vogt |url=http://www.journalism.org/2011/07/18/non-profit-news/ |date=July 18, 2011 |accessdate=October 23, 2015}}</ref><ref name=pew20130610>{{cite web |date=June 10, 2013 |title=Nonprofit Journalism: A Growing but Fragile Part of the U.S. News System |first1=Amy |last1=Mitchell |first2=Mark |last2=Jurkowitz |first3=Jesse |last3=Holcomb |first4=Jodi |last4=Enda |first5=Monica |last5=Anderson |url=http://www.journalism.org/2013/06/10/nonprofit-journalism/ |accessdate=October 23, 2015 |work=] |publisher=]}}</ref> The studies found that the most consistently ideological of the news outlets were those that were organized in networks, specifically the conservative Watchdog network and the liberal ].<ref name=nfj20110718/><ref name=pew20110718/> The 2011 Pew study found that Watchdog articles were about four times more likely to support a conservative theme as liberal.<ref name=pew20110718/><ref>{{cite news |title=The precipitous decline of state political coverage |first=Reid |last=Wilson |date=July 10, 2014 |accessdate=October 23, 2015 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2014/07/10/the-precipitous-decline-of-state-political-coverage/ |newspaper=] |quote=Another Pew study found Franklin Center Web sites were four times more likely to present stories with a conservative theme than a liberal theme. }}</ref> The 2011 Pew study found that 15% of Watchdog articles were exposes, that is, targeted a politician, program, or government agency, and that 11% targeted a Democratic politician, Democratic program, or Democratic-controlled government agency while 2% targeted Republicans.<ref name=pew20110718/> In 2012, the '']'' said that the characterization of the Watchdog websites as nonpartisan "seems only nominally true."<ref name=cjr20120913/>


== Affiliates == == Affiliates ==

Revision as of 02:55, 3 December 2015

The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (November 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Watchdog.org
Type of siteNews
Available inEnglish
FoundedSeptember 2009
OwnerFranklin Center for Government and Public Integrity
URLwww.watchdog.org
CommercialNo
Current statusActive

Watchdog.org is a network of American news websites that features reporting on state and local government from a conservative perspective. It is a project of the Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity, an online news organization. Watchdog posts stories on Watchdog websites and syndicates them.

Background

Watchdog.org's stated mission is "to restore oversight of our state governments, to hold politicians and bureaucrats at all levels accountable for their handling of taxpayers’ dollars and to promote individual liberty and free markets." According to the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR), Watchdog websites' reporting reflects the Franklin Center's focus on government waste and public employee unions. CJR characterized the productivity of the Watchdog sites as "impressive," and noted the commitment to original news reporting, as opposed to news aggregation or punditry.

Watchdog.org says that it has state-based investigative reporters in more than 40 states. In 2012, Watchdog had sites in 18 states. In 2014, the Franklin Center said they had one reporter in each of 14 state capitols and two in Nebraska and Virginia. Most of the Watchdog sites have one staff reporter in addition to accepting contributions from citizen journalists via a platform called Watchdog Wire.

In 2009, the Watchdog site in New Mexico analyzed data published by the administration of President Barack Obama regarding the expenditures authorized by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Watchdog.org reported that millions of dollars of federal stimulus funds were allocated to projects in congressional districts that did not exist; for example, to the twenty-second congressional district in New Mexico, although New Mexico has just three congressional districts. The national Watchdog.org site expanded the story, calling such districts "phantom districts." ABC News picked up the story. The Associated Press later reported that the phantom districts were the result of data entry errors in the government data.

Funding

Watchdog.org is a project of the 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization the Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity. According to Media Matters for America, the Franklin Center has its origins in the Sam Adams Alliance, a non-profit organization that promotes free-market Tea Party-style citizen activism. The Franklin Center received 95% of its 2011 revenue from the donor-advised fund Donors Trust. In April 2013, the Columbia Journalism Review wrote that Watchdog.org represented the "largest media investment to date" for Charles and David Koch.

Outside analysis

The Project for Excellence in Journalism of the Pew Research Center surveyed and analyzed nonprofit news organizations active on the state or national level in 2011 and again in 2013. The studies found that the most consistently ideological of the news outlets were those that were organized in networks, specifically the conservative Watchdog network and the liberal American Independent News Network. The 2011 Pew study found that Watchdog articles were about four times more likely to support a conservative theme as liberal. The 2011 Pew study found that 15% of Watchdog articles were exposes, that is, targeted a politician, program, or government agency, and that 11% targeted a Democratic politician, Democratic program, or Democratic-controlled government agency while 2% targeted Republicans. In 2012, the Columbia Journalism Review said that the characterization of the Watchdog websites as nonpartisan "seems only nominally true."

Affiliates

Affiliates of Watchdog.org include:

  • Illinois Watchdog
  • Kansas Watchdog
  • Missouri Watchdog
  • Montana Watchdog
  • Nebraska Watchdog
  • New Mexico Watchdog
  • Oklahoma Watchdog
  • Tennessee Watchdog
  • West Virginia Watchdog
  • Wisconsin Watchdog

References

  1. "Watchdog.org Site Info". Alexa Internet. Retrieved 2015-12-03.
  2. ^ Benton, Joshua (July 18, 2011). "Pew: Nonprofit journalism doesn't mean ideology-free". Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. Retrieved October 23, 2015.
  3. ^ Peters, Justin (September 13, 2012). "'Serious, point-of-view journalism'? A look at the most ambitious conservative news organization you've never heard of". Columbia Journalism Review. Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. Retrieved October 23, 2015.
  4. ^ "About". Watchdog.org. Franklin Center for Government & Public Integrity. Retrieved 4 June 2015.
  5. ^ "Franklin Center". Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. Retrieved October 23, 2015.
  6. ^ Stverak, Jason (March 12, 2010). "The pros and pros of 'citizen journalism'". Online Journalism Review. University of Southern California Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism. Retrieved October 27, 2015.
  7. ^ McGann, Laura (May 2010). "Partisan Hacks; Conservatives have discovered the virtues of investigative journalism. But can their reporting survive their politics?". Washington Monthly. Retrieved October 23, 2015.
  8. Scarantino, Jim (November 16, 2009). "Updated: Obama Stimulus Creates New Congressional Districts and Promotes New Mexico from Banana Republic to Coconut Republic". Watchdog.org. Retrieved October 27, 2015.
  9. McMorris, Bill (December 18, 2009). "Watchdog.org Releases District by (Phantom) District Stimulus Guide". Retrieved October 27, 2015.
  10. Karl, Jonathan (November 16, 2009). "Exclusive: Jobs 'Saved or Created' in Congressional Districts That Don't Exist". ABC News. Retrieved October 27, 2015.
  11. Apuzzo, Matt (November 19, 2009). "Stimulus accuracy comes under fire". Deseret News. Associated Press. Retrieved October 27, 2015.
  12. Strupp, Joe (February 22, 2013). "Franklin Center Top Donor Is Right-Wing's "Dark Money ATM"". Media Matters for America. Retrieved 3 December 2015.
  13. Abowd, Paul (February 14, 2013). "Donors use charity to push free-market policies in states". Center for Public Integrity. Retrieved 3 December 2015.
  14. Chavkin, Sasha (April 22, 2013). "The Koch brothers' media investment". Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved 3 December 2015.
  15. ^ Holcomb, Jesse; Rosenstiel, Tom; Mitchell, Amy; Caldwell, Kevin; Sartor, Tricia; Vogt, Nancy (July 18, 2011). "Assessing a New Landscape in Journalism". Project for Excellence in Journalism. Pew Research Center. Retrieved October 23, 2015.
  16. Mitchell, Amy; Jurkowitz, Mark; Holcomb, Jesse; Enda, Jodi; Anderson, Monica (June 10, 2013). "Nonprofit Journalism: A Growing but Fragile Part of the U.S. News System". Project for Excellence in Journalism. Pew Research Center. Retrieved October 23, 2015.
  17. Wilson, Reid (July 10, 2014). "The precipitous decline of state political coverage". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 23, 2015. Another Pew study found Franklin Center Web sites were four times more likely to present stories with a conservative theme than a liberal theme.

External links

Categories:
The Center Square: Difference between revisions Add topic