| Revision as of 13:12, 19 September 2015 editZwerg Nase (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers15,061 edits →GA Review: question← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:42, 19 September 2015 edit undoMudwater (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers64,774 edits Proceeding, or not, with the GA review.Next edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| {{u|Darknipples}}, {{u|Mudwater}}: It is hard for me to review this while it undergoes heavy changes. Any end in sight? ] (]) 13:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC) | {{u|Darknipples}}, {{u|Mudwater}}: It is hard for me to review this while it undergoes heavy changes. Any end in sight? ] (]) 13:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :{{Re|Zwerg Nase}} As I've explained on the talk page -- see my posts there, and in the talk page archives, for a full explanation -- having an article called "Gun show loophole" violates the Misplaced Pages NPOV policy. A better title would be "Background checks for firearm sales in the United States". There's been a lot of discussion about this issue, but as far as I can tell there's not going to be a consensus about it. At the current time I'm not planning to say much more about this. As far as the article itself, I have made some edits to it, but not that many. So for my part, I'd say go ahead with the GA review. <font face="cursive">— ]<small><sup> (])</sup></small></font> 13:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:42, 19 September 2015
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 07:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
On it! Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Darknipples, Mudwater: It is hard for me to review this while it undergoes heavy changes. Any end in sight? Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Zwerg Nase: As I've explained on the talk page -- see my posts there, and in the talk page archives, for a full explanation -- having an article called "Gun show loophole" violates the Misplaced Pages NPOV policy. A better title would be "Background checks for firearm sales in the United States". There's been a lot of discussion about this issue, but as far as I can tell there's not going to be a consensus about it. At the current time I'm not planning to say much more about this. As far as the article itself, I have made some edits to it, but not that many. So for my part, I'd say go ahead with the GA review. — Mudwater 13:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)