| Revision as of 12:03, 27 April 2015 editJeppiz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,033 edits →Seeking consensus to make an edit semi-protected request on 14 April 2015← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:51, 27 April 2015 edit undoTaivoLinguist (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers32,239 edits →Seeking consensus to make an edit semi-protected request on 14 April 2015Next edit → | ||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
| ::] I did not dispute the process of which of this ] was conducted, I only dispute its outcome. As for your logic on FYROM's self declared title, its entirely one sided, let me explain why... Greece is not the official title of Hellas (its "Hellenic democracy" which is the exact translation), yet everyone uses it. Does it cause any problems to the identity of another country? What if Greece changed its official title to "The republic of France" does it make it the official document that everyone will follow? If you think that a country that lives by non-democratic standards and no fair-play can change History and copy the identity of over a million people who have lived in the region for over 3000 years, and everyone decides to grant them this infringement, not an infringement upon Hellas but the entire legacy of those people to humanity, then I believe that this conversation is meaningless and its as if I'm talking to a wall. It really is a moral and a philosophical question, let me ask you. If everyone believe it, does it make it true? And as Orwell would have said, if everyone thinks 2+2=5, does it make it so? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ::] I did not dispute the process of which of this ] was conducted, I only dispute its outcome. As for your logic on FYROM's self declared title, its entirely one sided, let me explain why... Greece is not the official title of Hellas (its "Hellenic democracy" which is the exact translation), yet everyone uses it. Does it cause any problems to the identity of another country? What if Greece changed its official title to "The republic of France" does it make it the official document that everyone will follow? If you think that a country that lives by non-democratic standards and no fair-play can change History and copy the identity of over a million people who have lived in the region for over 3000 years, and everyone decides to grant them this infringement, not an infringement upon Hellas but the entire legacy of those people to humanity, then I believe that this conversation is meaningless and its as if I'm talking to a wall. It really is a moral and a philosophical question, let me ask you. If everyone believe it, does it make it true? And as Orwell would have said, if everyone thinks 2+2=5, does it make it so? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| :::Please read ], carefully. And we're not going to change the name of a country because you don't like it, or don't like Misplaced Pages's decision. This talk page doesn't have the authority to overrule ] even if such a consensus were reached here, so the discussion is rather pointless. We've explained the policy to you, and whether you like or not doesn't really matter.] (]) 12:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC) | :::Please read ], carefully. And we're not going to change the name of a country because you don't like it, or don't like Misplaced Pages's decision. This talk page doesn't have the authority to overrule ] even if such a consensus were reached here, so the discussion is rather pointless. We've explained the policy to you, and whether you like or not doesn't really matter.] (]) 12:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::::], if you don't dispute the process by which ] was conducted, then you have no basis whatsoever to dispute the validity of the ] of that process. That's the end of the matter. ] is the English Misplaced Pages standard. If you can't live with the fact that the most commonly used name of the Republic of Macedonia in English is "Macedonia", then I invite you to use the Greek Misplaced Pages where the Greek POV is pushed without restraint. --] (]) 12:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:51, 27 April 2015
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the North Macedonia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30Auto-archiving period: 2 months  |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | The title of this article has been established by a binding consensus process at Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (Macedonia). Further discussion takes place here. Any threads relating to the title of the article will be speedily archived. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on September 8, 2005, September 8, 2006, September 8, 2007, September 8, 2008, September 8, 2009, September 8, 2010, September 8, 2011, and September 8, 2012. |
 | North Macedonia received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the North Macedonia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
Semi-protected edit request on 23 January 2015
 | This edit request to Republic of Macedonia has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The name of the country you describe is F.Y.R.O.M (Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia). That is the official name and that is how it should be called. It is recognized by the United Nations as F.Y.R.O.M. not as Republic of Macedonia. Macedonia is a Greek county and that is why it couldn't be named as Macedonia when it was created. Please make the change. Misplaced Pages is a serious organization and must be very carefull with it's writings. Thank you P.S Take a look at the United Nations http://search.un.org/?ie=utf8&output=xml_no_dtd&oe=utf8&Submit=Go&__utmt=1&__utma=114554307.318540190.1422000016.1422000016.1422000016.1&__utmb=114554307.1.10.1422000016&__utmc=114554307&__utmz=114554307.1422000016.1.1.utmcsr%3Dgoogle%7Cutmccn%3D%28organic%29%7Cutmcmd%3Dorganic%7Cutmctr%3D%28not+provided%29&query=fyrom&tpl=un&lang=en&rows=10 79.129.115.194 (talk) 08:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Not done and will not be done - please see WP:NCMAC as referred to 4 times higher up this page, and numerous times in the archives - Arjayay (talk) 08:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 3 February 2015
| This edit request to Republic of Macedonia has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
You should really consider altering the article title along with every reference to a "Macedonian" whatever, thus alligning with the international treaties and the intrernationally acceptable term "FYROM". Thanks for Your consideration. Dominus72 (talk) 11:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Not done and will never be done. See WP:MOSMAC and WP:ARBMAC. --Taivo (talk) 12:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Seeking consensus to make an edit semi-protected request on 14 April 2015
Dear administrators and privileged users
I must request that this page be edited to portray the correct facts of current standing and decisions. This page concerns a country's origin and history and it must mirror the true facts that modern scholars and historians agree upon, something that simple users, who are clouded by the popular opinion and their own personal belief, cannot understand. Writing history is about truth and not a one sided belief. Not anyone can write history correctly, something must be researched and studied before it is considered a historical fact. If you still don't understand where I'm going at, I will lay this out flat, I am talking about the naming "dispute" (which really shouldn't be a dispute) of FYROM, which you, in a very disrespecting and ignorant way call Macedonia. The internationally recognised name of this country is "FYROM - Former Yugoslavic Republic of Macedonia" and not the "Republic of Macedonia" which you so blatantly refer this country as and have taken upon yourselves to create documents that dispute internationally recognised agreements. This site acts as a encyclopaedia (from the greek word ἐγκύκλιος παιδεία, meaning "general education" or "circular education") and not a self acknowledged legal entity that sparks a flame between countries.
The following sources were used, please care to read them clearly, as you have obviously not:
Misplaced Pages article about "Historiography"
Misplaced Pages article about "Encyclopedia"
Misplaced Pages article about "Historians"
The name FYROM is officially recognised
Read the last paragraph of the introduction please
WP:ARBMAC No propaganda please. Also I cant believe that this article starts with the name "Macedonia"..
I hope these sources are adequate enough.
Thank you for your time.
Leventopoulo (talk) 13:03, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}}template. Alakzi (talk) 13:46, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Leventopoulo I don't know what you think you're doing or what you're aiming to do with the "Removed the Template" above, but whatever it is, you're most likely not doing it. And no, there is no consensus for the strong POV you want to push, there is a consensus, even a policy, to the contrary.Jeppiz (talk) 18:06, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
I must apologise for the "Removed the Template", I didn't know if you could see that I edited out the template. So what you're saying is that there's no consensus for my POV but another person's one, which is contrary to mine? I don't think that there is fairness in that. Also I expressed not only my point of view but, in fact, the views of the whole scientific community that studies history, no need to mention the whole Hellenic nation. What I ask, is for there to be a clear distinction between the historical region of Macedonia, of which FYROM is only but the northern part, and the reality that Macedonia is not the official name of this 25 year old nation. Seeing the rejection of previous user attempts to revert this erroneous claim that reverts historical facts, I don't have high hopes that my request will be answered. I do hope that someone less close-minded and able to accept new ,although in reality old, facts reads this. Leventopoulo (talk) 18:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- You ask what difference there is between the region and the country. The difference is quite clear, the region is Macedonia (region) and the country is Republic of Macedonia. Users typing in Macedonia come to a short page explaining the different definitions, in a perfectly neutral manner.Jeppiz (talk) 15:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Leventopoulo, When the Misplaced Pages consensus that led to WP:MOSMAC was worked out, there were as many Greeks as anyone else involved in the discussion. It took several months to complete the process, and in the end it was the result of 1) careful consideration of all points of view and 2) careful analysis of common English language usage. Official positions of the Greek government are irrelevant. Official positions of the Macedonian government are irrelevant. Official positions of the UN are irrelevant. The only relevant matter is common English usage and it was determined through a complete analysis of usage in a wide variety of English language sources that "Macedonia" is the most name in English for the Republic of Macedonia. You mention "official" usage. "Republic of Macedonia" is the official name of the country as found in the only official document that matters--the Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia. It doesn't matter what other countries call it, the only official name of any country is the name it calls itself in its constitution. "Greece" is not the official name of Greece, it is the most common English name. The official name of Greece is "Hellenic Republic" (that's probably close to the correct translation, but you get the point). So "official" doesn't matter or else we'd have to move the article on "Greece". You are working under a completely false assumption. --Taivo (talk) 18:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Jeppiz I did not ask what the difference is, I know what the difference is. I asked you to make it clear. When someone types in "Republic of Macedonia" the first word that appears is only "Macedonia" and after that it says its self declared "official" name. I believe that it only confuses the matter more, and its not at all neutral.
- Taivo I did not dispute the process of which of this WP:MOSMAC was conducted, I only dispute its outcome. As for your logic on FYROM's self declared title, its entirely one sided, let me explain why... Greece is not the official title of Hellas (its "Hellenic democracy" which is the exact translation), yet everyone uses it. Does it cause any problems to the identity of another country? What if Greece changed its official title to "The republic of France" does it make it the official document that everyone will follow? If you think that a country that lives by non-democratic standards and no fair-play can change History and copy the identity of over a million people who have lived in the region for over 3000 years, and everyone decides to grant them this infringement, not an infringement upon Hellas but the entire legacy of those people to humanity, then I believe that this conversation is meaningless and its as if I'm talking to a wall. It really is a moral and a philosophical question, let me ask you. If everyone believe it, does it make it true? And as Orwell would have said, if everyone thinks 2+2=5, does it make it so? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leventopoulo (talk • contribs) 09:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- Please read WP:SOAPBOX, carefully. And we're not going to change the name of a country because you don't like it, or don't like Misplaced Pages's decision. This talk page doesn't have the authority to overrule WP:MOSMAC even if such a consensus were reached here, so the discussion is rather pointless. We've explained the policy to you, and whether you like or not doesn't really matter.Jeppiz (talk) 12:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- Leventopoulo, if you don't dispute the process by which WP:ARBMAC was conducted, then you have no basis whatsoever to dispute the validity of the result of that process. That's the end of the matter. WP:MOSMAC is the English Misplaced Pages standard. If you can't live with the fact that the most commonly used name of the Republic of Macedonia in English is "Macedonia", then I invite you to use the Greek Misplaced Pages where the Greek POV is pushed without restraint. --Taivo (talk) 12:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- Please read WP:SOAPBOX, carefully. And we're not going to change the name of a country because you don't like it, or don't like Misplaced Pages's decision. This talk page doesn't have the authority to overrule WP:MOSMAC even if such a consensus were reached here, so the discussion is rather pointless. We've explained the policy to you, and whether you like or not doesn't really matter.Jeppiz (talk) 12:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- Taivo I did not dispute the process of which of this WP:MOSMAC was conducted, I only dispute its outcome. As for your logic on FYROM's self declared title, its entirely one sided, let me explain why... Greece is not the official title of Hellas (its "Hellenic democracy" which is the exact translation), yet everyone uses it. Does it cause any problems to the identity of another country? What if Greece changed its official title to "The republic of France" does it make it the official document that everyone will follow? If you think that a country that lives by non-democratic standards and no fair-play can change History and copy the identity of over a million people who have lived in the region for over 3000 years, and everyone decides to grant them this infringement, not an infringement upon Hellas but the entire legacy of those people to humanity, then I believe that this conversation is meaningless and its as if I'm talking to a wall. It really is a moral and a philosophical question, let me ask you. If everyone believe it, does it make it true? And as Orwell would have said, if everyone thinks 2+2=5, does it make it so? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leventopoulo (talk • contribs) 09:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- B-Class North Macedonia articles
- Top-importance North Macedonia articles
- WikiProject North Macedonia articles
- B-Class country articles
- WikiProject Countries articles
- Selected anniversaries (September 2005)
- Selected anniversaries (September 2006)
- Selected anniversaries (September 2007)
- Selected anniversaries (September 2008)
- Selected anniversaries (September 2009)
- Selected anniversaries (September 2010)
- Selected anniversaries (September 2011)
- Selected anniversaries (September 2012)
- Old requests for peer review