| Revision as of 00:27, 13 April 2006 editLucidish (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,746 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 00:47, 24 July 2006 edit undo69.133.205.8 (talk) →Frankenlies.comNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Frankenlies.com == | == Frankenlies.com == | ||
| Frankenlies.com is an extremely poor, unreasonable source. http://frankenlies.blogspot.com/ If this were anything but Misplaced Pages, I wouldn't hesitate to remove it entirely. ] 00:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC) | Frankenlies.com is an extremely poor, unreasonable source. http://frankenlies.blogspot.com/ If this were anything but Misplaced Pages, I wouldn't hesitate to remove it entirely. ] 00:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Its not an unreasonable source at all. It is the aforementioned blog that is unreasonable. The left continues to cite this outdated link, which frankenlies.com has already debunked, thoroughly, right here: http://frankenlies.com/lies/blogger.htm | |||
Revision as of 00:47, 24 July 2006
Frankenlies.com
Frankenlies.com is an extremely poor, unreasonable source. http://frankenlies.blogspot.com/ If this were anything but Misplaced Pages, I wouldn't hesitate to remove it entirely. Lucidish 00:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
- Its not an unreasonable source at all. It is the aforementioned blog that is unreasonable. The left continues to cite this outdated link, which frankenlies.com has already debunked, thoroughly, right here: http://frankenlies.com/lies/blogger.htm