Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:02, 24 July 2014

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

Userpage

I read your userpage, and found the following phrase in this section:

Put in a WP:RS for this designation otherwise me or some other doubting thomas editor may remove the statement.

Care to explain yourself? My first name is Thomas, I'm intrigued. --Launchballer 22:11, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Editors say some film is a cult movie. Where is the WP:RS for that claim?...William 22:14, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

It's the Thomas bit I was interested in.--Launchballer 22:18, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

You're not familar with here....William 22:21, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Never heard of it.--Launchballer 22:43, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Troy Kingi

Hello WilliamJE. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Troy Kingi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article content has been added since it was tagged. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 01:54, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Montanez

Yeah I couldn't believe that intro. Pretty ridiculous. Anyways, good luck with the book, it sounds very interesting.--Yankees10 02:06, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ralph Houk may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• July 14, 2014|first=Joe|last=Reichler|work=Associated Press|publisher=The Tuscaloosa News]]}}</ref> After Berra's seven-game loss to the ] in the ],

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:28, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove large amounts of content so quickly

Hello. In reference to your recent edits to Amsterdam Airport Schiphol: I understand you may feel that a certain section is not the right one for certain content. Fair enough, I won't argue that, however, instead of just deleting all of it, why don't you just move it yourself? Copy + paste takes under 30 seconds. Or make a case for it on the talk page. By just deleting the content chances are it will get lost, it's purely by chance I noticed it in the edit history due to the whole fuzz around the Malaysian Airlines flight. It's good content and I moved it to the requested section now. Please do not just remove large amounts of good content in the future just because you dislike where it's at in the article.BabyNuke (talk) 02:37, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Regarding revision at 2014 Aviation accidents template

Sorry, but please excuse my edit as it fixes the smallcaps. Smallcaps indicates the deadliest aviation accident, but may change whenever nessecary. StormContent 15:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Read again but all those designations have been taken out of the accident templates per consensus....William 16:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Politeness by template

I don't appreciate the addition of a template to my talk page, berating me in a polite fashion. You were inserting false information in Misplaced Pages, a claim that there were no accidents that killed more then 50 people in 1982. You kept doing so, despite my objections. I consider mighty rude to continue reverting my edits without paying the least bit of attention to problems I'm pointing out.--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)