Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 02:24, 7 July 2014

May 2014

Hello, I'm Tutelary. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Kemp Muhl, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tutelary (talk) 23:09, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Kemp Muhl. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Misplaced Pages articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kemp Muhl was changed by 99.249.219.4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.986211 on 2014-05-14T22:42:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:42, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did at Kemp Muhl, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Tutelary (talk) 22:48, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did at Kemp Muhl, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Kemp Muhl was changed by 99.249.219.4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.98616 on 2014-05-15T23:00:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:00, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 23:13, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Kemp Muhl, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. I am One of Many (talk) 09:30, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:37, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Kemp Muhl, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Kemp Muhl was changed by 99.249.219.4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.986161 on 2014-05-18T07:04:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:04, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Your edits at Vaporwave have the strong appearance of spamming, which is not accepted in Misplaced Pages. Given that the album was released yesterday, any suggestion that it has been recognized as an example of vaporwave style is not credible.

If the album is your work, please understand that this is not a critique of the music. You simply need to find other ways to promote it. 50.185.134.48 (talk) 01:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

This is not my work. The album, after one day of release, has cracked the top 300 (and climbing) most popular Vaporwave releases on Bandcamp.com, surpassing some of the most recognized albums in the genre, like Chuck Person's Eccojams Vol.1, and Fuji Grid TV's Prism Corporation.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.249.219.4 (talk • contribs)

That is commendable so far as it goes, but it doesn't establish the album as a notable example of vaporwave style. What would establish it is a statement to that effect from a reliable source. Influential music gets recognized in writing all the time. There's no rush. 50.185.134.48 (talk) 02:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Do not link to rateyourmusic.com as a source. User generated sites are not accepted as reliable sources, and one only needs to look at rateyourmusic.com's address to see that it's user generated. Please read WP:Identifying reliable sources for more info. Also:

Your recent editing history at Vaporwave shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:07, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Vaporwave. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:07, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Vaporwave. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:13, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:22, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

What you've done wrong

Did you bother reading the notices on your page? The ones saying "don't add unsourced information" and "quit edit-warring"...? Then there's the part of my talk page saying "leave new messages at the bottom." If this site didn't operate off of text, I'd have to assume you were illiterate. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:22, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Why are you angry? Did your parents not love you? I'm surprised you haven't been blocked for speaking to other people that way on here. It doesn't matter what disagreement you may have, please try to be a professional, or you won't be taken seriously. Move on, sparky.