| Revision as of 15:15, 22 June 2014 editAshur (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,852 editsm Deleted "unneccesary" questions← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:23, 22 June 2014 edit undoAshur (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,852 edits Blanked the pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == June 2014 == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for ] and violating the ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ] (]) 14:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|reason=I know I edit warred and my block is justifed, but it's not fair that my block length is the same as LardoBalsamico's. I made compromises to stop edit warring (, ). Also in this you can see that I asked for reaching a consensus instead of edit warring in another article. These should count for something. | |||
| I have long history with LardoBalsamico which you can see . As you can see only wrong thing I made is edit warring and I accept my block but he has a long history of doing wrongs. He even made personal attacks to me on his appeal on the edit warring noticeboard. | |||
| Also, it is impossible to reach a consensus with him. As you can see , and . He never joins the discussions. Thanks for taking your time to read my request.|decline=Not an unblock request. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 15:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)}} | |||