Revision as of 18:54, 28 May 2014 editTgeorgescu (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users55,184 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 19:31, 28 May 2014 edit undoTgeorgescu (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users55,184 edits →28 May 2014: quote from User:KwwNext edit → | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
DVMt has been recently blocked for persistent sockpuppetry, and has edited ] and ] as Klocek just before being blocked. Suddenly after DVMt got blocked, at ] another dormant account is revived after about five years of dormancy and shows up editing the article. At {{diff|Talk:Lonicera japonica|244424376|244423940}} Onediscdrive self-identifies as a licensed acupuncturist, and DVMt self-identified as scientist and acupuncturist on his own user page. I have a strong suspicion that they are the same person. At ] the same argument about an account being revived after eight years of inactivity was made. ] (]) 18:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC) | DVMt has been recently blocked for persistent sockpuppetry, and has edited ] and ] as Klocek just before being blocked. Suddenly after DVMt got blocked, at ] another dormant account is revived after about five years of dormancy and shows up editing the article. At {{diff|Talk:Lonicera japonica|244424376|244423940}} Onediscdrive self-identifies as a licensed acupuncturist, and DVMt self-identified as scientist and acupuncturist on his own user page. I have a strong suspicion that they are the same person. At ] the same argument about an account being revived after eight years of inactivity was made. ] (]) 18:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
{{quote|I'm the one that upgraded the block. I may have misidentified the sock ''master'', but there's no way that this is anything but a sleeper account. 10 edits in a burst the day of account creation, an eight-year gap, and then leaping in to restore the edits of another account that I blocked doesn't lead to any other conclusions.—|](]) 13:48, 28 May 2014 (UTC)|]}} | |||
:Quoted by ] (]) 19:31, 28 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> |
Revision as of 19:31, 28 May 2014
DVMt
DVMt (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/DVMt/Archive.
This case was moved to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/DVMt from Klocek (talk · contribs). Future cases should be placed there.
28 May 2014
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- DVMt (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Onediscdrive (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Klocek (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
DVMt has been recently blocked for persistent sockpuppetry, and has edited Acupuncture and Talk:Acupuncture as Klocek just before being blocked. Suddenly after DVMt got blocked, at Acupuncture another dormant account is revived after about five years of dormancy and shows up editing the article. At Onediscdrive self-identifies as a licensed acupuncturist, and DVMt self-identified as scientist and acupuncturist on his own user page. I have a strong suspicion that they are the same person. At User_talk:Klocek the same argument about an account being revived after eight years of inactivity was made. Tgeorgescu (talk) 18:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
I'm the one that upgraded the block. I may have misidentified the sock master, but there's no way that this is anything but a sleeper account. 10 edits in a burst the day of account creation, an eight-year gap, and then leaping in to restore the edits of another account that I blocked doesn't lead to any other conclusions.—
— Kww(talk) 13:48, 28 May 2014 (UTC), User talk:Klocek
- Quoted by Tgeorgescu (talk) 19:31, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: